This paper evaluates the energy efficiency of EU countries over the period 20002010. At the first stage, data envelopment analysis (DEA) is used, combining multiple energy consumption data and economic outputs. The efficiency estimates obtained from the analysis are evaluated in a second stage through a multiple criteria decision aiding methodology (MCDA). The proposed non-parametric approach combining DEA with MCDA enables modeling of the problem in an integrated manner, not only providing energy efficiency estimates but also supporting the analysis of the main contributing factors, as well as the development of a benchmarking model for energy efficiency evaluation at the country level.
AdlerN.FriedmanL.Sinuany-SternZ. (2002). “Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context.” European Journal of Operational Research140:249-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00068-1.
2.
AngB.W.MuA.R.ZhouP. (2010). “Accounting frameworks for tracking energy efficiency trends.” Energy Economics32:1209-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.eneco.2010.03.011.
3.
ArcelusF.G.ArocenaP. (2000). “Convergence and productive efficiency in fourteen OECD countries: a non-parametric frontier approach.” International Journal of Production Economics66:105-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00116-4.
4.
BampatsouC.HadjiconstantinouG. (2004). “The use of the DEA method for simultaneous analysis of the interrelationships among economic growth, environmental pollution and energy consumption.” International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research2:65-86.
5.
BampatsouC.PapadopoulosS.ZervasE. (2013). “Technical efficiency of economic systems of EU-15 countries based on energy consumption.” Energy Policy55:426-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.021.
6.
BankerR.D.CharnesA.CooperW.W. (1984). “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis.” Management Science30:1078-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078.
7.
BeltonV.StewartT.J. (1999). “DEA and MCDA: Competing or complementary approaches?” In: Meskens N, Roubens M, editors. Advances in decision analysis, Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers; p. 87-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0647-6_6.
8.
BouyssouD. (1999). “Using DEA as a tool for MCDM: some remarks.” Journal of the Operational Research Society50:974-78.
9.
BoydG.A. (2008). “Estimating plant level energy efficiency with a stochastic frontier.” The Energy Journal29(2):23-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol29-No2-2.
10.
BoydG.A.PangJ.X. (2000). “Estimating the linkage between energy efficiency and productivity.” Energy Policy28:289-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00016-1.
11.
CeylanD.GunayE.N.O. (2010). “Energy efficiency trends and policies: Cross-country comparison in Europe.” Presented at International Conference of Economic Modelling (ECOMOD), Istanbul.
12.
CharnesA.CooperW.W.RhodesE. (1978). “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.” European Journal of Operational Research2:429-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
13.
ChienT.HuJ.L. (2007). “Renewable energy and macroeconomic efficiency of OECD and non-OECD economies.” Energy Policy35:3606-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.033.
14.
DahlstromK.EkinsP. (2005). “Eco-efficiency trends in the UK steel and aluminum industries.” Journal of Industrial Ecology9:171-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/108819805775247954.
15.
DiakoulakiD.ZopounidisC.MavrotasG.DoumposM. (1999). “The use of a preference disaggregation method in energy analysis and policy making.” Energy24:157-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(98)00081-4.
DoyleJ. (1995). “Multiattribute choice for the lazy decision maker: Let the alternatives decide!” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes62:87-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1034.
18.
EmersonJ.W.HsuA.LevyM.A.de SherbininA.MaraV.EstyD.C.JaitehM. (2012). “2012 Environmental Performance Index and Pilot Trend Environmental Performance Index”, New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy.
19.
European Union. Directive 2006/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5April2006 on Energy End-use Efficiency and Energy Services and Repealing Council Directive 93/76/EEC; 2006.
20.
FareR.GrosskopfS.Hernandez-SanchoF. (2004). “Environmental performance: an index number approach.” Resource and Energy Economics26:343-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.reseneeco.2003.10.003.
21.
FilippiniM.HuntL.C. (2011). “Energy demand and energy efficiency in the OECD countries: a stochastic demand frontier approach.” The Energy Journal32:59-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-No2-3.
22.
FrondelM.SchmidtC.M. (2002). “The capital-energy controversy: An artifact of cost shares?” The Energy Journal23(3):53-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol23-No3-3.
23.
GunnC. (1997). “Energy efficiency vs economic efficiency.” Energy Policy25, 241–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(96)00113-9.
24.
HalkosG.TzeremesN. (2013). “Renewable energy consumption and economic efficiency: Evidence from European countries.” MPRA Paper No. 44136 (available at: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44136/).
25.
HonmaS.HuJ.L. (2008). “Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in Japan.” Energy Policy36:821-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.026.
26.
HuJ.L.KaoC.H. (2007). “Efficient energy-saving targets for APEC economies.” Energy Policy35:373-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.032.
27.
HuJ.L.WangS.C. (2006). “Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China.” Energy Policy34:3206-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.06.015.
28.
JiaY.P.LiuR.Z. (2012). “Study of the energy and environmental efficiency of the Chinese economy based on a DEA model.” Procedia Environmental Sciences8:2256-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.214.
29.
KaoK.HungH.T. (2005). “Data envelopment analysis with common weights: The compromise solution approach.” Journal of the Operational Research Society56(10):1196-1203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601924.
30.
LahdelmaR.SalminenP. (2001). “SMAA-2: Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making.” Operations Research49(3):444-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.49.3.444.11220.
31.
LahdelmaR.SalminenP. (2006). “Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis using the data envelopment model.” European Journal of Operational Research170(1):241-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.040.
32.
LanfangC.JingwanL. (2009). “Modeling undesirable factors in the measurement of energy efficiency in China.” IEEE, Red Hook, NY: International Conference on Management and Service Science; p. 1-4, 20–22.
33.
LozanoS.GutierrezE. (2008). “Non-parametric frontier approach to modelling the relationships among population, GDP, energy consumption and CO2 emissions.” Ecological Economics66:687-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.003.
34.
LuC.C.ChiuY.H.ShyuM.K.LeeJ.H. (2013). “Measuring CO2 emission efficiency in OECD countries: Application of the hybrid efficiency model.” Economic Modelling32:130-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.01.047.
35.
MandalS.K. (2010). “Do undesirable output and environmental regulation matter in energy efficiency analysis? Evidence from Indian cement industry.” Energy Policy38:6076-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.063.
36.
MavrotasG.TrifillisP. (2006). “Multicriteria decision analysis with minimum information: combining DEA with MAVT.” Computers and Operations Research33:2083-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2004.11.023.
37.
MundaG.SaisanaM. (2007). “Methodological considerations on regional sustainability assessment based on multicriteria and sensitivity analysis.” Regional Studies45(2):261-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343401003713316.
38.
NeumayerE. (2003). “Weak versus strong sustainability: exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms.” 2nd ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
39.
NevesL.P.DiasL.C.AntunesC.H.MartinsA.G. (2009). “Structuring an MCDA model using SSM: A case study in energy efficiency.” European Journal of Operational Research199:834-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.053.
40.
OECD. Measuring material flows and resource productivity, volume I—The OECD guide. Paris: OECD, 2008
41.
PattersonM.G. (1996). “What is energy efficiency? Concepts, indicators and methodological issues.” Energy Policy24(5):377-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(96)00017-1.
42.
QinX.S.HuangG.H.ChakmaA.NieX.H.LinQ.G. (2008). “A MCDM-based expert system for climate-change impact assessment and adaptation planning—a case study for the Georgia Basin, Canada.” Expert Systems with Applications34:2164-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.02.024.
43.
RamanathanR. (2005). “Estimating energy consumption of transport modes in India using DEA and application to energy and environmental policy.” Journal of the Operational Research Society56:732-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/pal-grave.jors.2601866.
44.
RyanL.CampbellN. (2012). “Spreading the net: The multiple benefits of energy efficiency improvements.” IEA Energy Papers, No. 2012/08, OECD Publishing;2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k9crzjbpkkc-en.
45.
Sinuany-SternZ.MehrezA.HadadY. (2000). “An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units.” International Transactions in Operational Research7:109-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.2000.tb00189.x.
46.
Vlahinic-DizdarevicN.SegotaA. (2012). “Total-factor energy efficiency in the EU countries.” Proceedings of Rijeka School of Economics30(2):247–65.
47.
WeiC.Y.NiJ.ShenM. (2009). “Empirical analysis of provincial energy efficiency in China.” China & World Economy17:88-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-124X.2009.01168.x.
48.
WeiC.NiJ.ShengM. (2011). “China’s energy inefficiency: A cross-country comparison.” The Social Science Journal48:478-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.10167j.soscij.2011.05.004.
49.
YehT.L.ChenT.Y.LaiP.Y. (2010). “A comparative study of energy utilization efficiency between Taiwan and China.” Energy Policy38:2386-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.030.
50.
YuJ. (2010). “Energy efficiency and household behaviour in OECD countries (DRAFT).”
51.
ZhangX.P.ChengX.M.YuanJ.H.GaoX.J. (2011). “Total-factor energy efficiency in developing countries.” Energy Policy39:644-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.enpol.2010.10.037.
52.
ZhaoX.MaC.HongD. (2010). “Why did China’s energy intensity increase during 1998-2006: Decomposition and policy analysis.” Energy Policy38:1379-1388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.019.
53.
ZhouP.AngB.W. (2008). “Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance.” Energy Policy36:2911-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.041.
54.
ZhouP.AngB.W.PohK.L. (2006). “Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update.” Energy31:2604-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2005.10.023.
55.
ZhouP.AngB.W.PohK.L. (2008a). “Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies.” Energy Economics30:1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.05.001.
56.
ZhouP.AngB.W.PohK.L. (2008b). “A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies.” European Journal of Operational Research189:1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.04.042.
57.
ZhouP.AngB.W.ZhouD.Q. (2012). “Measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance: A parametric frontier approach.” Applied Energy90:196-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.02.025.
58.
ZopounidisC.DoumposM. (1999). “A multicriteria decision aid methodology for sorting decision problems: The case of financial distress.” Computational Economics14:197-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008713823812.
