This research quantifies changes in consumer welfare due to changes in visitor satisfaction with the availability of information about recreational sites. The authors tested the hypothesis that an improvement in visitor satisfaction with recreation information increases the number of visits to national forests, resulting in increased consumer welfare. They tested the hypothesis with a travel cost model for the Allegheny National Forest using data from the National Visitor Use Monitoring (NVUM) programme. An ex ante simulation suggests that annual per capita consumer welfare increased when highly satisfactory recreation information was available. The findings, along with the expected costs of providing better recreation information, may be a useful reference for recreation site managers who wish to increase the number of visits in an economically effective way.
BaumC.F.SchafferM.E.StillmanS. (2003), ‘Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing’, Stata Journal, Vol 3, pp 1–31.
2.
BelsleyD.KuhE.WelschR. (2004), Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity, Wiley-IEEE, New York.
3.
BollenK.A.JackmanR.W. (1990), ‘Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influential cases’, in FoxJ.LongJ.S., eds, Modern Methods of Data Analysis, SAGE, Newbury Park, CA, pp 257–291.
4.
BowkerJ.M.EnglishD.BergstromJ.C.StarbuckC.M. (2005), ‘Valuing national forest recreation access: Using a stratified on-site sample to generate values across activities for a nationally pooled sample’, American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Providence Rhode Island, 24–27 July, 2005.
5.
BrasingtonD.M.HiteD. (2005), ‘Demand for environmental quality: A spatial hedonic analysis’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol 35, No 1, pp 57–82.
CookR. (1977), ‘Detection of influential observation in linear regression’, Technometrics, Vol 19, No 1, pp 15–18.
8.
DiamondD.B.Jr (1980), ‘The relationship between amenities and urban land prices’, Land Economics, Vol 56, No 1, pp 21–32.
9.
EpanechnikovV.A. (1969), ‘Non-parametric estimation of a multivariate probability density’, Theory of Probability and its Applications, Vol 14, pp 153–158.
10.
FantazziniD.HöökM.AngelantoniA. (2011), ‘Global oil risks in the early 21st Century’, Energy Policy, Vol 39, No 12, pp 7865–7873.
11.
GreeneW.H. (1994), ‘Accounting for excess zeros and sample selection in Poisson and negative binomial regression models’, working paper, Department of Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York.
12.
GumR.MartinW. (1975), ‘Problems and solutions in estimating the demand for and value of rural outdoor recreation’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 57, No 4, pp 558–566.
13.
HeberlingM.TempletonJ. (2009), ‘Estimating the economic value of national parks with count data models using on-site, secondary data: The case of the great sand dunes national park and preserve’, Environmental Management, Vol 43, No 4, pp 619–627.
14.
HendersonJ. (1991), ‘Optimal regulation of land development through price and fiscal controls’, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol 30, No 1, pp 64–82.
15.
HushakL.J. (1975), ‘The urban demand for urban-rural fringe land’, Land Economics, Vol 51, No 2, pp 112–123.
KelejianH.H.PruchaI.R. (2007), ‘Hac estimation in a spatial framework’, Journal of Econometrics, Vol 140, No 1, pp 131–154.
18.
KeskeC.LoomisJ. (2007), ‘High economic values from high peaks of the west’, A Journal of the Western Agricultural Economics Association, Vol 6, No 1, p 34.
19.
KocisS.M.EnglishD.B.K.ZarnochS.J.ArnoldR.WarrenL. (2002), ‘National visitor use monitoring results: Allegheny National Forest’, USDA Forest Service Region 9.
20.
LambertD.M.McNamaraK.T. (2009), ‘Location determinants of food manufacturers in the united states, 2000–2004: Are nonmetropolitan counties competitive?’, Agricultural Economics, Vol 40, No 6, pp 617–630.
21.
LevineN. (1999), ‘The effects of local growth controls on regional housing production and population redistribution in california’, Urban Studies, Vol 36, No 12, pp 2047–2068.
MayesI.VogelJ.LienemannA. (2004), ‘Assessment of regional recreation and barriers to recreation’, in RischbieterD., ed, Oroville Facilities Relicensing FERC Project No. 2100, Department of Water Resources, The Resources Agency, State of California
24.
MeisnerC.WangH.LaplanteB. (2006), Welfare Measurement Bias in Household and On-site Surveying of Water-based Recreation: An Application to Lake Sevan, Armenia, World Bank, Development Research Group, Infrastructure and Environment Team.
NeweyW.K.WestK.D. (1987), ‘A simple, positive-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix’, Econometrica, Vol 55, pp 703–708.
27.
O'NeillC.E.DavisJ. (1991), ‘Alternative definitions of demand for recreational angling in Northern Ireland’, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 42, No 2, pp 174–179.
28.
ParzenE. (1962), ‘On estimation of a probability density function and mode’, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol 33, No 3, pp 1065–1076.
29.
SmirnovO.A.EganK.J. (2009), ‘Spatial random utility model with an application to recreation demand’, Economic Modelling, Vol In Press, Corrected Proof.
StarbuckC.M.BerrensR.P.McKeeM. (2006), ‘Simulating changes in forest recreation demand and associated economic impacts due to fire and fuels management activities’, Forest Policy and Economics, Vol 8, No 1, pp 52–66.
32.
StewartL.LambertD.M. (2011), ‘Spatial heterogeneity of factors determining ethanol production site selection in the U.S., 2000–2007’, Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol 35, No 3, pp 1273–1285.
33.
StockJ.H. (1991), ‘Nonparametric policy analysis: An application to estimating hazardous waste cleanup benefits’, in BarnettW.A.PowelJ.TauchenG.E., eds, Nonparametric and Semiparametric Methods in Econometrics and Statistics: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium in Economic Theory and Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
34.
USDA Forest Service (2005), National Forest Visitor Use Monitoring Program National Project Results January 2000 through September 2003, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.
35.
USDA Forest Service (2006), National Visitor Use Monitoring Results for Allegheny National Forest. USDA Forest Service Region 9, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.
WhiteE.WilsonJ. (2008), National Visitor Use Monitoring Implementation in Alaska, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
42.
WhitneyG.G. (1990), ‘The history and status of the hemlock-hardwood forests of the allegheny plateau’, Journal of Ecology, Vol 78, No 2, pp 443–458.
43.
WooldridgeJ.M. (2002), Economic Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
