The Economic Value of Novel Means of Ascending High Mountain Peaks: A Travel Cost Demand Model of Pikes Peak Cog Railway Riders,Automobile Users and Hikers
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2009
The Economic Value of Novel Means of Ascending High Mountain Peaks: A Travel Cost Demand Model of Pikes Peak Cog Railway Riders,Automobile Users and Hikers
In addition to hiking trails, some peaks have alternative transportation routes such as cog railways, trams or roads to reach the summit. The authors use a count data travel cost model to estimate the recreational demand for traditional and novel means of ascending Pikes Peak in Colorado. Their analysis shows statistically significant differences in the demand curve slopes and in the net willingness to pay (consumer surplus) for three categories of recreationists who take alternative means to ascend the mountain. The more exotic or unique the means of ascent, the higher the visitor benefits are. Cog railway and automobile users and those ascending by hiking receive consumer surpluses of US$98, US$54 and US$31, respectively, per day trip.
CesarioF.KnetschJ. (1970), ‘Time bias in recreation benefit estimates’, Water Resources Research, Vol 6, No 3, pp 700–704.
2.
CreelM.LoomisJ. (1990), ‘Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 72, No 2, pp 434–445.
3.
CreelM.LoomisJ. (1991), ‘Confidence intervals for welfare measures with application to a problem of truncated counts’, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol 73, No 2, pp 370–373.
4.
DillmanD. (2000), Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
5.
EnglinJ.ShonkwilerS. (1995), ‘Modeling recreation demand in the presence of unobservable travel costs: Toward a travel price model’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol 29, No 3, pp 368–377.
6.
EnglishD.KocisK.ZarnochS.ArnoldJ.R. (2002), ‘Forest Service National Visitor Use Monitoring Process’, USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report SRS-57, Southern Research Station, Ashville, NC.
7.
FeatherP.ShawD. (1999), ‘Estimating the cost of leisure time for recreation demand models’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol 38, No 1, pp 49–65.
8.
HaabT.McConnellK. (2002), Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA.
9.
HellersteinD. (1992), ‘The treatment of non-participants in travel cost analysis and other demand models’, Water Resources Research, Vol 28, No 8, pp 1999–2004.
10.
JacksonE.WongR. (1982), ‘Perceived conflict between urban cross-country skiers and snowmobilers in Alberta’, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol 14, No 1, pp 47–62.
11.
KeithJ.E. (1980), Snowmobiling and Cross-Country Skiing Conflicts in Utah: Some Initial Research Results, Proceedings of the North American Symposium on Dispersed Winter Recreation, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, pp 57–63.
12.
KeskeC.M.LoomisJ. (2007), ‘High economic values from high peaks of the West’, Western Agricultural Economics Association, Western Economic Forum, Spring 2007, Vol 6, No 1, pp 34–41.
13.
KoontzL.HoagD.L. (2005), ‘Disparate stakeholder management of wildlife issues in the southern Greater Yellowstone Area’, in BurkA.R., ed, Trends in Biodiversity Research, Nova Science Publishers, Inc, New York, pp 101–116.
14.
LambertD.K.ShawW.D. (2000), ‘Agricultural and recreational impacts from surface flow changes due to gold mining operations’, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol 25, No 2 (December), pp 533–546.
15.
LoomisJ. (2002), Integrated Public Lands Management: Principles and Applications to National Forests, Parks, Wildlife Refuges, and BLM Lands, 2nd edition, Columbia University Press, New York.
16.
LoomisJ. (2005), ‘Updated Outdoor Recreation Use Values on National Forests and Other Public Lands’, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-658, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
17.
ManningR. (1985), Studies in Outdoor Recreation, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR.
18.
ManningR.WangB.ValliereW.LawsonS.NewmanP. (2002), ‘Research to estimate and manage carrying capacity of a tourist attraction: A study of Alcatraz Island’, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol 10, pp 388–464.
19.
ManningR.ValliereW.WangB.LawsonS.NewmanP. (2003), ‘Estimating day use social carrying capacity in Yosemite National Park’, Leisure: The Journal of the Canadian Association for Leisure Studies, Vol 27, No 1–2, pp 77–102.
MayJ.A. (1997), ‘Measuring consumer surplus of Wyoming snowmobilers using the travel cost method’, Master's thesis, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
22.
NewmanP.WallaceG.McKonlyW.McFarlandA. (2006), ‘An analysis of recreational target shooting on the Pawnee National Grasslands, Colorado’, 2006 Long-Term Ecological Research Grant All Scientists Meeting, 20–23 September 2006, Estes Park, Colorado, Poster Presentation.
23.
RosenthalD.WalshR. (1986), ‘Hiking values and the recreation opportunity spectrum’, Forest Science, Vol 32, pp 405–415.
24.
ShelbyB. (1980), ‘Contrasting recreational experiences: Motors and oars in the Grand Canyon’, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol 35, No 3, pp 129–131.
25.
SmithV.K. (1993), ‘Welfare effects, omitted variables and the extent of the market’, Land Economics, Vol 69, No 2, pp 121–131.
26.
TarrantM.A.CordellH.K. (2002), ‘Environmental assessment: amenity values of public and private forests: Examining the value–attitude relationship’, Environmental Management, Vol 30, No 5, pp 692–703.
27.
VaskeJ.J.DonnellyM.P.HeberleinT.A. (1980), ‘Perceptions of crowding and resource quality by early and more recent visitors’, Leisure Sciences, Vol 3, No 4, pp 367–381.
28.
WardF. (1984), ‘Specification considerations for the price variable in travel cost demand studies’, Land Economics, Vol 60, No 3, pp 301–305.
