Livestock producers have been widely affected by past reforms of the European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). This paper analyses the post-2013 CAP influences on farmer decision making in terms of how many livestock units to keep on-farm under the ‘with’ and ‘without’ CAP scenarios. The analysis is based on a survey of 1,301 specialized livestock farms across nine European member states carried out in 2009. The changes in trend in the number of animals reared take into account the different livestock typologies. The results show that the member states that have most recently gained accession are most sensitive to CAP reform, along with organic farming and livestock systems located in hilly and mountainous areas. All are expected to show a decline in their numbers of livestock, while specialist dairy units are expected to increase.
BartoliniF.ViaggiD. (2012), ‘An analysis of policy scenario effects on the adoption of energy production on the farm: A case study in Emilia–Romagna (Italy)’, Energy Policy, Vol 51, pp 454–464.
2.
BarnesA.Toma1L.MathewsK.SutherlandL.A.ThomsonS. (2014), ‘Intensify, diversify, opt-out: Testing farmer stated intentions to past and future CAP reform scenarios’, paper prepared for presentation at the 88th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society, 9–11 April, AgroParisTech, Paris.
3.
CopusM.A.KellyR. (1999), ‘The implications of further CAP reform on the regional impact of livestock headage payments in Scotland’, website: www.macaulay.ac.uk.
4.
CsakiC.JamborA. (2010), ‘Five years of accession: Impacts on agriculture in the NMS’, EuroChoices, Vol 9, No 2, pp 10–17.
5.
EspostiR. (2011), ‘Evaluating the CAP reform as a multiple treatment effect: Evidence from Italian farms’Proceeding of 122nd EAAE Seminar, Evidence-Based Agricultural and Rural Policy Making: Methodological and Empirical Challenges of Policy Evaluation, 17–18 February, Ancona, Italy.
6.
European Commission (2004), The Meat Sector in the European Union, Directorate-General for Agriculture, European Commission, Brussels.
7.
European Commission (2006), Milk and Milk Products in the European Union, Directorate-General for Agriculture, European Commission, Brussels.
8.
European Commission (2010), The CAP towards 2020: Meeting the Food, Natural Resources and Territorial Challenges of the Future, COM 672 Final, DG Agriculture, European Commission, Brussels.
9.
Eurostat (2011), ‘Agriculture and Fisheries Statistics Main Results 2009–10’, website: ec.europa.eu/eurostat.
10.
GiannoccaroG.BerbelJ. (2013), ‘Farmers' stated preference analysis towards resources use under alternative policy scenarios’, Land Use Policy, Vol 31, No 2, pp 145–155.
11.
GortonM.DouarinE.DavidovaS.LatruffeL. (2008), ‘Attitudes to agricultural policy and farming futures in the context of the 2003 CAP reform: A comparison of farmers in selected established and New Member States’, Journal of Rural Studies, Vol 24, pp 322–336.
HashaG. (2002), ‘Livestock feeding and feed imports in the European Union – a decade of change’, Electronic Outlook Report from the Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
14.
LefebvreM.EspinosaM.Gomez y PalomaS. (2012), The Influence of the Common Agricultural Policy on Agricultural Landscapes, JRC Scientific and Policy Reports, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
15.
MatthewsA. (2011), Post-2013 EU Common Agricultural Policy, Trade and Development. A Review of Legislative Proposals, Issue Paper No 39, ICTSD Programme on Agricultural Trade and Sustainable Development, Dublin.
16.
NeumannK.ElbersenB.SthfestE.WoltjerG.B. (2011), ‘Multi-scale scenarios of spatial–temporal dynamics in the European livestock sector’, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol 140, No 1, pp 88–101.
17.
Rocamora-MontielB.ColomboS.Salazar-OrdóñezM. (2014), ‘Social attitudes in southern Spain to shape EU agricultural policy’, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol 36, No 1, pp 156–171.
18.
SlangenL.H.G.Van KootenG.C.SuchánekP. (2004), ‘Institutions, social capital and agricultural change in Central and Eastern Europe’, Journal of Rural Studies, Vol 20, pp 245–256.
19.
ThomsonK.J.PsaltopoulosD. (2007), ‘General equilibrium analysis of the spatial impacts of rural policy’Proceeding of 103rd Seminar of the European Association of Agricultural Economists, 23–25 April, Barcelona.
20.
Toro-DunayA.BálintCsaba I.VinogradovG.G. (2012), ‘Lessons from the EU accession for agricultural enterprises in the Visegrad group countries in the light of CAP 2014’, Zeszyty Naukowe Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskieg Warszawie. Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Vol 12, No 3.
21.
ViaggiD.RaggiM.Gomez y PalomaS. (2011), ‘Farm-household investment behaviour and the CAP decoupling: Methodological issues in assessing policy impacts’, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol 33, No 1, pp 127–145.
