This paper examines the diffusion of entrepreneurial activities among Italian universities, the evolution of the organizational models implemented to facilitate such activities and the commitment of the universities to the Third Mission of social and economic development. As previous analyses have shown, Italian universities have only recently moved towards the valorisation and exploitation of their scientific knowledge. In contrast to the varied and in some cases openly hostile attitudes of the past, there now seems to be greater acceptance of and a more positive approach towards entrepreneurship. Many universities have introduced innovations both in the organizational processes and activities of scientific research and in the management of research results. Because empirical evidence is very limited, the authors have used a longitudinal analysis to contribute to debate on the subject, with a discussion of the evolution of universities currently engaged in such activities and identification of possible changes in their cultures.
BarneyJ.B. (1991), ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, Vol 17, pp 99–120.
2.
BercovitzJ.FeldmanM. (2006), ‘Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 31, pp 175–188.
3.
CesaroniF.ContiG.PiccalugaG.MascaraP.C. (2005), ‘Technology transfer offices (TTO) in Italian universities: What they do and how they do it’, Working Paper No 5, IN-SAT Laboratory, Scuola Superiore S Anna di Pisa.
4.
ClarkB.R. (1998), Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation, Pergamon Press, New York.
5.
ClarkB.R. (2004), Sustaining Change in Universities, Society for Research into Higher Education, Open University Press, London.
CortiE. (2008), ‘Un modello virtuoso di trasferimento di conoscenze’, Innovare, Vol 4, December, pp 16–18.
8.
CortiE.RiviezzoA. (2008), ‘Hacia la universidad emprendedora: Un análisis del compromiso de las universidades Italianas en el desarrollo económico y social’, Economía Industrial, Vol 368, pp 113–124.
9.
EtzkowitzH. (1983), ‘Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science’, Minerva, Vol 21, pp 198–233.
10.
EtzkowitzH. (1998), ‘The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages’, Research Policy, Vol 27, pp 36–50.
11.
EtzkowitzH. (2004), ‘The evolution of the entrepreneurial university’, International Journal of Technology and Globalization, Vol 1, pp 64–77.
12.
EtzkowitzH.WebsterA.HealeyP. (1998), Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia, State University of New York, Albany, NY.
13.
European Commission (2002), Final Report of the Expert Group ‘Best Procedure’ Project on Education and Training for Entrepreneurship, Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry, Brussels.
14.
European Commission (2005), The Competitiveness Challenge: Enterprise Europe, Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry, Brussels.
15.
European Commission (2006), ‘Fostering entrepreneurial mindsets through education and learning’, Commission Communication, No 33, Brussels.
16.
European Commission (2007), Towards a European Research Area Science, Technology and Innovation: Key Figures 2007, Directorate-General for Research, Brussels.
17.
European Commission (2008a), Survey of Entrepreneurship in Higher Education in Europe, Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry, Brussels.
18.
European Commission (2008b), Annual Report on EU Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry, Brussels.
19.
FayolleA., ed (2007), Handbook of Research in Entrepreneurship Education, Volume 1, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
20.
FeldmanM.P.FellerI.BercowitzJ.E.L.BurtonR.M. (2001), ‘Understanding evolving university–industry relationships’, in FeldmanM.P.LinkA.N. eds, Innovation Policy in the Knowledge Based Economy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp 171–188
21.
FellerI. (1990), ‘Universities as engines of R&D-based economic growth: They think they can’, Research Policy, Vol 19, pp 335–348.
22.
GeunaA. (1998), ‘The internationalization of the European university: A return to medieval roots’, Minerva, Vol 36, pp 253–270.
23.
GibbA.A. (2005), ‘Towards the entrepreneurial university: Entrepreneurship education as a lever for change’, Policy Paper for the National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship, No 15, National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship, Birmingham.
24.
GrasJ.M.G.LaperaD.R.G.SolvesI.M.JoverA.J.V.AzuarJ.S. (2008), ‘An empirical approach to the organizational determinants of spin-off creation in European universities’, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Vol 4, pp 187–198.
25.
KlofstenM.Jones-EvansD. (2000), ‘Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe – the case of Sweden and Ireland’, Small Business Economics, Vol 14, pp 299–309.
26.
LernerJ. (2005), ‘The university and the start-up: Lessons from the past two decades’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 30, pp 49–56.
27.
LeydesdorffL.EtzkowitzH. (1996), ‘Emergence of a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations’, Science and Public Policy, Vol 23, pp 279–286.
28.
MartinelliA.MeyerM.von TunzelmannN, (2008), ‘Becoming an entrepreneurial university? a case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 33, pp 259–283.
29.
McMillanI.C.ZemannL.SubbanarasimhaP.N. (1987), ‘Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 2, pp 123–137.
30.
NapolitanoM.R.RiviezzoA. (2005), ‘Institutional education and training for entrepreneurship development in the Italian universities', presented at the International Conference ‘The Role of Universities in the Entrepreneurship Development of Local Areas’, 5 April, University of Sannio, Benevento.
31.
NapolitanoM.R.RiviezzoA. (2008), ‘Institutional education and training for entrepreneurship development in the Italian universities’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol 8, pp 665–685.
32.
NETVAL (2006), La valorizzazione della ricerca nelle universityà italiane: Quarto rapporto annuale, Network per la Valorizzazione della Ricerca Universitaria, Milan.
33.
PeterafM. A. (1993), ‘The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 14, pp 179–191.
34.
PiccalugaA. (2001), La valorizzazione della ricerca scientifica, Franco Angeli, Milan.
35.
PiccalugaA.BalderiC. (2006), ‘Consistenza ed evoluzione delle imprese spin-off della ricerca pubblica in Italia', presented at the annual Finlombarda workshop, ‘Finanza e Innovazione’, 25 September, Milan.
36.
PowersJ.B.McDougallP.P. (2005), ‘University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 20, pp 291–311.
37.
RobertsE.B.MaloneD.E. (1996), ‘Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations’, R&D Management, Vol 26, pp 17–48.
38.
SchumpeterJ. (1991), ‘Comments on a plan for the study of entrepreneurship’, in SchumpeterJ., The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
39.
SchumpeterJ. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
40.
SorrentinoM. (2006), ‘Venture capital informale e imprenditorialità innovativa’, Sinergie, Vol 71, pp 99–126.
41.
WernerfeltB. (1984), ‘A resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 5, pp 171–180.
