Elections,Parties and Elites in Indonesia's Local Politics

Abstract

This paper examines the processes and outcomes of Indonesia's first ever direct local elections through an analysis of the 2006 mayoral election in Batam. The paper highlights and seeks to explain a paradox in contemporary Indonesia's local politics: that is, the weakening of political parties' influence in local political change at a time when political parties maintain a monopoly over the nomination of candidates for local government heads. The analysis shows that, instead of parties, party machines and party platforms, wealthy and politically influential local elites have come to dominate electoral competition for local government heads. The paper provides an understanding of how direct local elections have affected the political dynamics of Batam, which was an integral part of Soeharto's patronage system that upheld the New Order regime until 1998. Furthermore, the author suggests that analysing local political change can improve our understanding of Indonesia's political development more broadly.

Keywords

political parties elections elites local politics decentralization Batam Indonesia

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ananta

Arifin

E. N.

, and Suryadinata

(2005), Emerging Democracy in Indonesia, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.

Asia Foundation (2002), ‘Indonesia's Rapid Decentralization Appraisal (IRDA): first report’, May, Asia Foundation, Jakarta.

Batam Industrial Development Authority – BIDA (2005), Development Progress Batam, Indonesia 2004, BIDA, Batam.

Choi

(2007), ‘Local elections and democracy in Indonesia: The Riau Archipelago’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol 37, No 3, pp 326–345.

Colombijn

(2003), ‘Chicks and chicken: Singapore's expansion to Riau’, IIAS Newsletter, No 31, July.

Faucher

(2005), ‘Regional autonomy, Malayness and power hierarchy in the Riau Archipelago’, in Erb

Sulistyanto

, and Faucher

, eds, Regionalism in Post Suharto Indonesia, RoutledgeCurzon, New York, pp 125–140.

Haris

(2005), Pemilu Langsung di Tengah Oligarki Partai: Proses Nominasi dan Seleksi Calon Legislatif Pemilu 2004, Gramedia, Jakarta.

Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung and ADEKSI – Asosiasi DPRD Kota Seluruh Indonesia (2003), Pemilihan Langsung Kepala Daerah: Transformasi Menuju Demokrasi Lokal, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Jakarta.

Lanti

I. G.

(2006), ‘Indonesia: Accomplishments amidst challenges’, in Singh

, and Salazar

L. C.

, eds, Southeast Asian Affairs 2006, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, pp 93–110.

10.

Leveard

, and Kwok

(1998), ‘Now, Habibie Inc.’ Asia Week, 5 June.

11.

Liang

T. L. C.

(2001), Explaining Indonesia's Relations with Singapore During the New Order Period: The Case of Regime Maintenance and Foreign Policy, Working Paper No 10, Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Singapore.

12.

Mackie

J. A. C.

(1970), ‘The Commission of Four report on corruption’, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol 6, No 3, pp 87–101.

13.

Mitzner

(2007), ‘Local elections and autonomy in Papua and Aceh: Mitigating or fuelling secessionism?’ Indonesia, Vol 84, October.

14.

Mitzner

(2008), ‘New rules for old elites: The 2005 gubernatorial elections in North Sulawesi and Indonesia's long road to democracy’, in Bunte

, and Ufen

, eds, Democratization in Post-Suharto Indonesia: The Transformation of a Hybrid Regime (forthcoming), Routledge, London.

15.

National Democratic Institute for International Affairs – NDI (2003), ‘Laws on the structure and composition of the MPR, DPR, DPD and DPRDS (Susduk Law) passed by the DPR on 9 July 2003: a short guide’, 16 July, NDI, Jakarta.

16.

Rasyid

M. R.

(2003), ‘Regional autonomy and local politics in Indonesia’, in Aspinall

, and Fealy

, eds, Local Power and Politics in Indonesia: Decentralisation and Democratization, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, pp 63–71.

17.

Robison

(1986), Indonesia: The Rise of Capital, Allen & Unwin, Sydney and London.

18.

Tesoro

J. M.

(1998), ‘En route to Jakarta’, Asia Week, 4 September.

19.

Ufen

(2006), Political Parties in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Between politik aliran and Philippinisation, Working Paper No 37, German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg.

20.

Vel

(2005), ‘Pilkada in East Sumba: an old rivalry in a new democratic setting’, Indonesia, Vol 80, October, pp 81–107.

21.

Winters

(1996), Power in Motion: Capital Mobility and the Indonesian State, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.