The authors analyse the entry and exit activity in the UK–Europe airline markets and study the differential traits of three main airlines (British Airways, EasyJet and RyanAir) during1997–2004. They find that entry and exit are more likely in large markets and in markets with a high number of incumbents. Already operating in the city-pair enhances the probability that the same firm will enter another route in the same city-pair. The existence of charter flights generates both entries and exits, while high seasonality generally discourages entry. Also, the level of service quality provided by the incumbents matters.
BarretS.D. (2000), ‘Airport competition in the deregulated European aviation market. An uprising of the theory of industrial structure’, Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol 6, pp 13–27.
2.
BerryS.T. (1992), ‘Estimation of a model of entry in the airline industry’, Econometrica, Vol 60, No 4, pp 889–917.
3.
BoguslaskiC.ItoH.LeeD. (2004), ‘Entry patterns in the southwest airlines route system’, Review of Industrial Organization, Vol 25, pp 317–350.
4.
BorensteinS. (1992), ‘The evolution of US airline competition’, Journal of Economic Perspective, Vol 6, pp 45–73.
5.
BuenstorfG.KlepperS. (2004), ‘The origin and location of entrants in the evolution of the US tire industry’, Working Paper No. 7, Max Planck Institute, Jena.
6.
DixitA. (1980), ‘The role of investment in entry deterrence’, Economic Journal, Vol 90, pp 95–106.
7.
DoganisR. (2001), The Airline Business in the 21st Century, Routledge, London.
8.
TheEconomist (2003), ‘A way out of the wilderness’, in The Economist, 3–9 May 2003, pp 69–70.
9.
FrenchT. (1992), ‘The European Commission's 3rd Air Transport Liberalisation Package’, Travel & Tourism Analyst, Vol 5, pp 5–22.
10.
GreeneW.H. (2002), NLogit Version 3.0 Reference Guide, Econometric Software, Inc., New York.
11.
HannanT. (1983), ‘Prices, capacity and the entry decision: A conditional logit analysis’, Southern Economic Journal, Vol 50, pp 539–550.
12.
HendricksK.PiccioneM.TanG. (1997), ‘Entry and exit in hub-spoke networks’, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol 28, No 2, pp 291–303.
13.
ItoH.LeeD. (2004), ‘Incumbent responses to lower cost entry: Evidence from the US airline industry’, mimeo.
14.
LawtonT. (2002), Cleared for Take-Off: Structure and Strategy in the Low Fare Airline Business, Ashgate, Aldershot.
15.
MazzeoM.J. (2003), ‘Competition and service quality in the US airline industry’, Review of Industrial Organization, Vol 22, pp 275–296.
16.
MorrisonS.A.WinstonC. (1990), ‘The dynamics of airline pricing and competition’, American Economic Review, Vol 80, pp 389–393.
17.
MottaM. (2004), Competition Policy. Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18.
PigaC.A.BachisE. (2007), ‘Pricing strategies by European traditional and low cost airlines: Or, when is it the best time to book online?’, in LeeD., ed, Advances in Airline Economics. The Economics of Airline Institutions, Operations and Marketing, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
19.
PigaC.A.FilippiN. (2002), ‘Booking and flying with low cost airlines’, International Journal of Tourism Research, Vol 4, pp 237–249.
20.
PigaC.A.Poyago-TheotokyJ. (2005), ‘Endogenous R&D spillovers and locational choice’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol 35, pp 127–139.
21.
SinclairR.A. (1995), ‘An empirical model of entry and exit in the airline markets’, Review of Industrial Organization, Vol 10, pp 541–557.
22.
Warnock-SmithD.PotterA. (2005), ‘An exploratory study into airport choice factors for European low-cost airlines’, Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol 11, pp 388–392.
