This paper examines empowerment as a strategy, from the resource-based perspective, for the development of Greek tertiary education. As the literature suggests, empowerment enables individuals to make decisions and simultaneously take responsibility for their actions. Moreover, it increases the quality of research and teaching procedures as well as amplifying educators' and students' satisfaction and performance. In this respect, the paper uses the well-known Whetten and Cameron questionnaire for empowerment in a survey conducted among students studying in the B, D, F and H semesters at a Greek university operating in Thessaloniki. The principal component factor analysis of a sample 395 students revealed the existence of four dimensions of student empowerment: meaning/self-efficacy, self-determination, trust and personal control. After discussion of the findings, a number of recommended tactics and policies concerning the enhancement of student empowerment conclude the paper.
BlanchardK.CarlosJ.RandolphA. (1996), Empowerment Takes More Than a Minute’, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
2.
BlockP. (1987), The Empowered Manager: Positive Political Skills at Work, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
3.
CarlzonJ. (1987), Moments of Truth, Harper and Row, New York.
4.
CongerJ.KanungoR. (1988), ‘The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 13, No 3, pp 471–482.
5.
CostelloM.BrunnerP.HastyK. (2002), ‘Preparing students for the empowered workplace: The risks and rewards in a management classroom’, Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol 3, No 2, pp 117–127.
6.
DeeJ.HenkinA.DuemerL. (2003), ‘Structural antecedents and psychological correlates of teacher empowerment’, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol 41, No 3, pp 257–277.
7.
Duhon-HaynesG. (1996), ‘Student empowerment: Definition, implications and strategies for implementation’, paper presented at the Third World Symposium, Grambling, LA, March.
GlasserW. (1990). The Quality School: Managing Students Without Coercion, Perennial Library, New York.
10.
HofstedeG.H. (1980), Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
11.
LuechauerD.ShulmanG. (1992), ‘Moving from bureaucracy to empowerment: Shifting paradigms to practice what we preach in class’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Region of the Academy of Management, St Charles, IL, 22–25 April.
12.
MartinkoM.GardnerL. (1982), ‘Learned helplessness: An alternative explanation of for performance deficits’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 7, pp 195–204.
13.
MaturanaH.VarelaF. (1987), The Tree of Knowledge, Shambhala, Boston, MA.
14.
McClellandD. (1975), Power, The Inner Experience, Irvington, New York.
15.
McKeachieW. (1986), Teaching Tips: A Guidebook for the Beginning College Teacher, D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA.
16.
MehraS.RheeM. (2004), ‘Enhancing educational learning through some TQM principles’, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol 21No 8, pp 801–816.
17.
MishraA.K. (1992), Organizational Response to Crisis: The Role of Mutual Trust and Top Management Teams, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan Business School, Ann Arbor, MI.
18.
MoyeM.HenkinA.EgleyR. (2005), ‘Teacher–principal relationships: Exploring linkages between empowerment and interpersonal trust’, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol 43, No 3, pp 260–277.
19.
NicolaidisC.S. (1992), ‘Cultural determinants of corporate excellence in an integrated world economy: The impact of national cultures on organisational performance’, in CassonM., ed, International Business and Global Integration: Some Empirical Studies, Macmillan, London.
20.
NicolaidisC.S.MichalopoulosG. (2004), ‘Education, industry and the knowing–doing gap: A knowledge management perspective of business education’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 18, No 2, pp 101–110.
21.
NonakaI. (1991), ‘The knowledge-creating company’, Harvard Business Review, November–December.
22.
ShortP.GreerJ.MelvinW. (1994), ‘Creating empowered schools: Lessons in change’, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol 32, No 4, pp 38–52.
23.
SpreitzerG. (1995), ‘Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 38, No 5, pp 1442–1465.
24.
StewartJ. (1991), Review of Troy Duster's Backdoor to Eugenics, Social Forces, Vol 70, pp 276–277.
25.
SuleimanM. (1998), ‘The virtues of responsible teaching: Implications for empowerment’, portions of this paper were presented at the Annual Conference of the National Social Science Association, see Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), Washington, DC.
26.
TasiosTh. (2000), ‘The international patient: Society and economy’, Elepherotipia Newspaper, 27 March, p 5 [in Greek].
27.
ThomasK.W.VelthouseB.A. (1990), Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 15, pp 666–681.
28.
TsamasfirouG. (2000), ‘The new international concurrence’, Elepherotipia Newspaper, 27 March, p 3 [in Greek].
29.
TzoniA.ZachariadisP.TsorbatzoudisH. (2005), ‘The perception of access to school resources as an antecedent of teachers' psychological empowerment and job satisfaction’, Hellenic Journal of Physical Education and Sport, Vol 54.
30.
WhettenD.CameronK. (1995), Developing Management Skills, 3rd edition, HarperCollins, New York.
