Many companies have implemented the team approach as a way to empower their employees in an effort to enhance productivity, quality and overall profitability. While application of the concept to higher education administration has been limited, colleges and universities could benefit from the team approach if implemented appropriately and conscientiously. The authors discuss some of the issues and concerns that are relevant to implementing the team approach in an academic environment. Suggestions for implementing teams in higher education are provided, including the difference between the team approach and traditional administration, the importance of a preliminary needs assessment, the development of an implementation plan, the critical role of leadership, dealing with issues of assessment and accountability, and the concept of team efficacy.
AdamsS.KydoniefsL. (2000), ‘Making teams work’, Quality Progress, Vol 33, No 1, pp 43–48.
2.
AndersonN.WestM. (1998), ‘Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol 19, No 3, pp 235–258.
3.
ArnwineA. (1995), Are Self-Directed Work Teams Successful and Effective Tools for Today's Organization?, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
4.
AxelrodR. (2000), Terms of Engagement: Changing the Way We Change Organizations, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
BoyettJ.BoyettJ. (1998), The Guru Guide: The Best of the Top Management Thinkers, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
11.
BurpittW.BigonessW. (1997), ‘Leadership and Innovation among Teams: The Impact of Empowerment’, Small Group Research, Vol 28, No 3, pp 414–423.
12.
CampionM.PapperE.MedskerG. (1996), ‘Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension’, Personnel Psychology, Vol 49, pp 429–452.
13.
ChenG.WebberS.BlieseP.MathieuJ.PayneS.BornD.ZaccaroS. (2002), ‘Simultaneous examination of the antecedents and consequences of efficacy beliefs at multiple levels of analysis’, Human Performance, Vol 49, pp 429–452.
14.
CiullaJ. (ed), Ethics: The Heart of Leadership, Quorum Books, Westport, CT.
15.
CottrillM. (1997), ‘Give your work teams time and training’, The Academy of Management Executive, Vol 11, No 3, pp 87–89.
16.
CrantonP. (1998), No One Way: Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Wall and Emerson, Toronto.
17.
DietrichR.ChildressT. (2004). Group Interaction in High Risk Environments, Ashgate, Burlington, VT.
18.
DobbinsG.ZaccaroS. (1986), ‘The effects of group cohesion and leader behavior on subordinate satisfaction’, Group and Organization Studies, Vol 11, No 3, pp 203–219.
19.
EbyL.MeadeA.ParisiA.DouthittS. (1999), ‘The development of an individual-level teamwork expectations measure and the application of a within-group agreement statistic to assess shared expectations for teamwork’, Organizational Research Methods, Vol 2, pp 366–394.
20.
EllemersN.KortekaasP.OuwerkerkJ. (1999), ‘Self-categorization, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity’, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol 29, pp 371–389.
21.
FairholmG. (1991), Values Leadership: Toward a New Philosophy of Leadership, Praeger, New York.
22.
FisherK. (1995), Tips For Teams: A Ready Reference for Solving Common Team Problems, McGraw-Hill, New York.
23.
FisherK. (2000), Leading Self-Directed Work Teams: A Guide to Developing New Team Leadership Skills, McGraw-Hill, New York.
24.
ForsythD. (1999), Group Dynamics, 3rd edition, Brooks/Cole-Wadsworth, New York.
25.
FranzN. (2004), ‘Self-directed work teams: The antidote for “heroic suicide”’, Journal of Extension, Vol 42, No 2, online, www.joe.org/2004april/ttl.shtml.
26.
HackmanR. (1990), Groups That Work (and Those That Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
27.
HeckscherC.DonnellonA. (1994), The Post Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
28.
HickmanG. (1998), ed, Leading Organizations: Perspectives for a New Era, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
29.
HuberM. (1997), Community College Faculty Attitudes and Trends, 1997, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
30.
HuszczoG. (1996), Tools for Team Excellence: Getting Your Team into High Gear and Keeping It There, Davies-Black, Palo Alto, CA.
31.
Institute of Leadership and Management (2007), Coaching and Training Your Work Team Super Series, 5th edition, Permagon Flexible Learning, Burlington, MA.
32.
JewellL.ReitzJ. (1981), Group Effectiveness in Organizations, Scott Foreman and Company, Glenview, IL.
33.
KatzenbachJ. (1998), Teams at the Top: Unleashing the Potential of Both Teams and Individual Leaders, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
34.
KinlawD. (1991), Developing Superior Work Teams: Building Quality and the Competitive Edge, Lexington, Toronto.
35.
KinlawD. (1998), Superior Teams: What They Are and How to Develop Them, Gower, Brookfield, VT.
36.
KirkmanB.RosenB. (1999), ‘Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 42, pp 58–74.
37.
KirkmanB.RosenB.TeslukP.GibsonC. (2004), ‘The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 47, pp 175–192.
38.
KraigerK.Cannon-BowersJ. (1995), ‘Measuring knowledge organization as a method for assessing learning during training’, Human Factors, Vol 37, pp 804–812.
39.
LaFastoF.LarsonC. (2001), When Teams Work Best: 6,000 Team Members and Leaders Tell What It Takes to Succeed, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
40.
LarsonC.LaFastoF. (1989), TeamWork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong, Sage, London.
41.
LehtonenK.BarrettL. (2003), Managing a Product Development Team, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD.
42.
LevineJ. (2005), Personnel Turnover and Team Performance, US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Arlington, VA.
43.
LewisJ. (1998), Team-Based Project Management, American Management Association, New York.
44.
LudwigB. (1998), ‘The leader as a facilitator’, paper presented at the Leading Learning Organizations, Charleston, South Carolina.
45.
MackayA. (1993), Team Up for Excellence, Oxford University Press, New York.
46.
MarksM.ZaccaroS.MathieuJ. (2000), ‘Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 85, pp 971–986.
47.
MichalisinM.KarauS.TanpongC. (2004), ‘Top management team cohesion and superior industry returns: An empirical study of the resource-based view’, Group and Organization Management, Vol 29, pp 125–140.
48.
MillerD. (2003), ‘The stages of group development: A retrospective study of dynamic team processes’, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Vol 20, pp 121–134.
49.
MillerM. (1996), Developing High-Performance Cross-Functional Teams: Understanding Motivations, Functional Loyalties, and Teaming Fundamentals, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
50.
MowdayR.PorterL.SteersR. (1979), ‘The measurement of organizational commitment’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol 12, pp 321–332.
51.
NallM. (1998), ‘Trust and teamwork: An experiential learning activity’, paper presented at the Leading Learning Organizations, Charleston, South Carolina.
52.
NashS. (1999), Turning Team Performance Inside Out: Team Types and Temperament for High-Impact Results, Davies-Black, Palo Alto, CA.
53.
NewmanF.CouturierL.ScurryJ. (2004), The Future of Higher Education: Rhetoric, Reality and the Risks of the Market, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
54.
PalmesP. (2006). The Magic of Self-Directed Work Teams: A Case Study in Courage and Culture Change, American Society for Quality, Milwaukee, WI.
55.
ParkerG.McAdamsJ.ZielinskiD. (2001), Rewarding Teams: Lessons from the Trenches, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
PattersonT. (1998), ‘Commentary II: A new paradigm for extension administration’, Journal of Extension, Vol 36, No 1, online, www.joe.org/joe/1998february/comm1.html.
58.
PetersonR. (2001), Leading Teams and Organizations, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, unpublished document.
59.
PriceJ.MuellerC. (1986), Handbook of Organizational Measurement, Pitman, Marshfield, MA.
60.
PurserR.CabanaS. (1998), The Self-Managing Organization: How Leading Companies Are Transforming the Work of Teams for Real Impact, Free Press, New York.
61.
RennR. (1998), ‘High-performing self-managed work teams: A comparison of theory and practice’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 23, No 4, pp 816–818.
62.
RobinsonM.SparrowP.CleggC.BirdiK. (2007), ‘Forecasting future competency requirements: A three phase methodology’, Personnel Review, Vol 36, No 1, pp 65–90.
63.
SawyerJ. (2001), Development and Test of a Theory of Work Team Productivity, Air Force Research Laboratory, Mesa, AZ.
64.
US Department of Energy (1997), Guide to Good Practices for Teamwork Training and Diagnostic Skills Development, Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
65.
WellinsR.ByhamW.DixonG. (1994), Inside Teams: How 20 World-Class Organizations Are Winning Through Teamwork, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
66.
WellinsR.ByhamW.WilsonJ. (1991), Empowered Teams: Creating Self-Directed Work Groups That Improve Quality, Productivity and Participation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
67.
WestM.AndersonN. (1996), ‘Innovation in top management teams’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 81, No 6, pp 680–693.
68.
ZimmermannA.SparrowP. (2007), ‘Mutual adjustment processes in international teams: Lessons for the study of expatriation’, International Studies in Management and Organization, Vol 37, No 3, pp 65–88.
