Pasture-Based Dairy and Water Hyacinth ( Eichornia Crassipes ) for Reduced Biological Oxygen Demand in Dairy Discharge Water

Abstract

Degradation of surface water quality through point and non-point source pollution is a major problem worldwide. Elevated biological oxygen demand (BOD₅) in a waterbody results in the depletion of dissolved oxygen and subsequently adversely impacts on aquatic life. Discharge water from a dairy facility is enriched with oxygen-demanding substances such as total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP) or organic carbon, and has elevated BOD₅. Therefore, it is important to have a sufficiently reduced BOD₅ concentration in dairy discharge water prior to discharging it to the natural streams or waterways. The authors compared BOD₅ in discharge water from confined dairy and pasture-based dairy, and assessed the effectiveness of the water hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes) for BOD₅ reduction in dairy discharge water at UL Lafayette Research Farm in Cade, Louisiana. The dairy wastewater treatment system consisted of a first anaerobic lagoon and a second facultative lagoon. From 1985 to 2005, water samples were collected at least once a month by the grab method at the outlet of the facultative lagoon. These were analysed for BOD₅, total suspended solids (TSS) and pH as per the compliance requirements of the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality. In 2003, the second pond was divided into two halves and water hyacinths were introduced into one half of the pond. Water samples were collected for one year in seven sampling events by the grab method from the following four locations: inlet and outlet of the first pond, and each outlet of the divided second pond. Water samples were analysed in the lab for BOD₅, TSS, total combustible solids (TCS), TN, nitrate/nitrite-N (NO₃/NO₂-N) and TP; while pH and temperature were determined in the field. Wastewater inflow data and dairy herd data were obtained from the records. The average BOD₅ concentration of discharge water from pasture-based dairy was 28% lower compared with the confined dairy. Water hyacinths reduced BOD₅ concentration by 30.2%, TN by 44% and TP by 19.4% compared with the pond without water hyacinths. Pasture-based dairy and the introduction of water hyacinths in the dairy wastewater treatment system show the potential for reducing BOD₅ and oxygen-demanding substances, as well as minimizing surface water pollution and related environmental degradation from a dairy operation.

Keywords

confined dairy pasture-based dairy water hyacinth dairy wastewater treatment water quality biological oxygen demand

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chambers

J. M.

, and McComb

A. J.

(1994), ‘Establishing wetland plants in artificial systems’, Water Science Research, Vol 29, pp 79–84.

Cicek

(2003), ‘A review of membrane bioreactors and their potential application in the treatment of agricultural wastewater’, Canadian Biosystems Engineering, Vol 45, pp 6.37–6.49.

Clesceri

L. S.

Greenberg

A. E.

, and Eaton

A. D.

, eds (1998), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20 ed, APHA, Washington, DC.

Giasson

Bryant

R. B.

, and Bills

N. L.

(2002), ‘Environmental and economic optimization of dairy manure management: A mathematical programming approach’, Agronomy Journal, Vol 94, pp 757–766.

Ham

J. M.

(2002), ‘Uncertainty analysis of the water balance technique for measuring seepage from animal waste lagoons’, Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol 31, pp 1370–1379.

Ibekwe

A. M.

Grieve

C. M.

, and Lyon

S. R.

(2003), ‘Characterization of microbial communities and composition in constructed dairy wetland wastewater effluent’, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol 69, No 9, pp 5060–5069.

Isik

(2004), ‘Environmental regulation and the spatial structure of the U.S. dairy sector’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 86, No 4, pp 949–962.

Knowlton

K. F.

Radcliffe

J. S.

Novak

C. L.

, and Emmerson

D. A.

(2004), ‘Animal management to reduce phosphorus losses to the environment’, Journal of Animal Science, Vol 82 (E Supplement), pp E173–E195.

Meyer

(2000), ‘Dairying and the environment’, Journal of Dairy Science, Vol 83, pp 1419–1427.

10.

Newton

G. L.

Bernard

J. K.

Hubbard

R. K.

Allison

J. R.

Lowrance

R. R.

Gascho

G. J.

Gates

R. N.

, and Vellidis

(2003), ‘Managing manure nutrients through multi-crop forage production’, Journal of Dairy Science, Vol 86, pp 2243–2252.

11.

Poudel

D. D.

Jeong

C. Y.

, and Anzalone

(2006), ‘Seasonal variation in dissolved oxygen levels in bayou Plaquemine Brule watershed’, in Poudel

D. D.

, ed, Louisiana Surface Water Quality Conference Proceedings, 1–3 June 2005, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA, pp 12–22.

12.

Reddy

K. R.

, and DeBusk

W. F.

(1985), ‘Nutrient removal potential of selected aquatic macrophytes’, Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol 14, pp 459–462.

13.

Reed (1995), Natural Systems for Waste Management Systems, McGraw-Hill Publishers, Washington, DC.

14.

SAS (2003), The Statistical Analysis System Software for Windows. SAS 9.1.3 (9.1 TS1M3 2002–2003), SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.

15.

Spears

R. A.

Kohn

R. A.

, and Young

A. J.

(2003), ‘Whole-farm nitrogen balance on Western dairy farms’, Journal of Dairy Science, Vol 86, pp 4178–4186.

16.

Sung

, and Santha

(2001), ‘Performance of temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) system treating dairy cattle wastes’, Tamkang Journal of Science and Engineering, Vol 4, No 4, pp 301–310.

17.

Vaillant

Monnet

Sallanon

Coudret

, and Hitmi

(2004), ‘Use of commercial plant species in a hydroponic system to treat domestic wastewaters’, Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol 33, pp 695–702.

18.

Vermaat

J. E.

, and Hanif

M. K.

(1998), ‘Performance of common duckweed species (Lemnaceae) and the waterfern Azolla filiculoides on different types of waste water’, Water Research, Vol 32, No 9, pp 2569–2576.

19.

White

S. L.

Sheffield

R. E.

Washburn

S. P.

King

L. D.

, and Green

G. T.

Jr (2001), ‘Spatial and time distribution of dairy cattle excreta in an intensive pasture system’, Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol 30, pp 2180–2187.