Most UK Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) have committed themselves to developing an Enterprise Strategy for their region. This commitment is mainly in response to the current Labour government's keenness to see enterprise and entrepreneurship at the centre of any economic development agenda. Pro-entrepreneurship policies have been embraced as a means of generating economic growth and diversity, ensuring competitive markets, helping the unemployed to create jobs for themselves, countering poverty and welfare dependency, encouraging labour market flexibility and drawing individuals out of informal economic activity. The regional dimension of economic regeneration has been influenced, in part, by increasing interest in the local ramifications of national innovation and entrepreneurship policies, and also by growing awareness of the local or regional phenomenon of enterprise creation and innovation. The authors examine the connection between R&D activities in universities and the creation of new businesses (in particular ICT firms), and especially the role that social capital plays in fostering these relationships or connections. Preliminary empirical analyses suggest the importance of university–high-tech industry social capital in generating technology based start-ups. The findings suggest a case for fostering ‘connectedness’ between research universities and high-technology firms in regions with interest in technology-based entrepreneurship.
AcsJ.S. (2002), Innovation and the Growth of Cities, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
2.
AdamsS.DavidS. (2004), ‘Research and regions: An overview of the distribution of research in UK regions, regional research capacity and links between strategic research partners’, Higher Education Policy Institute, London.
3.
AgrawalA. (2001), ‘University-to-industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions’, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol 3, No 4, pp 285–302.
4.
AldrichH.ZimmerC. (1986), ‘Entrepreneurship through social networks’, in SmilerR.SextonD., eds, The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship, Ballinger, New York, pp 3–23.
5.
AllenJ. (1992), Starting a Technology Business, Pitman, London.
6.
LittleArthur D. (2003), Innovation and Technology Audit for the East of England: Report to the East of England Development Agency, East of England Development Agency, Histon.
7.
AudretschD.B. (1995), Innovation and Industrial Evolution, MIT Press, Boston, MA.
8.
AudretschD.B.FeldmanM.P. (1996), ‘R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production’, American Economic Review, Vol 86, No 3, pp 630–640.
9.
BarroR.J.LeeJ.-W. (1993), ‘International comparisons of educational attainment’, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol 32, pp 363–394.
10.
BartlettC.A.DozY.HedlundG. (1990), Managing the Global Firm, Routledge, London.
11.
BeckerG.S.MurphyK.M.TamuraR. (1990), ‘Human capital, fertility, and economic growth’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol 98, No 5, pp S12–S37.
12.
BurtR.S. (1992), Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
13.
CapelloR. (1999), ‘Spatial transfer of knowledge in high technology milieux: Learning versus collective learning processes’, Regional Studies, Vol 33, pp 353–365.
14.
DavidP. (1992), ‘Knowledge, property and the system dynamics of technological change’, Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics 1992, World Bank, Washington, DC.
15.
DTI (1998), Our Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge Driven Economy, White Paper, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
16.
DubiniP.AldrichH. (1991), ‘Personal and extended frameworks are central to entrepreneurial process’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 6, No 5, pp 305–313.
17.
EC (2002), ‘High-tech SMEs in Europe’, Observatory of European SMEs, No 6, European Commission, Brussels.
18.
EgelnJ. (2004), ‘Location decisions of spin-offs from public research institutions’, Industry and Innovation, Vol 11, No 3, pp 207–223.
19.
FeldmanM.P. (1994), ‘The university and high technology start-ups: The case of Johns Hopkins University and Baltimore’, Economic Development Quarterly, Vol 8, pp 67–77.
20.
FellerI. (1990), ‘Universities as engines of R&D based economic growth: They think they can’, Research Policy, Vol 19, pp 335–348.
21.
FRESA (2002), East of England Labour Market Assessment, Background Paper, East of England Framework for Regional Employment and Skills Action.
22.
GartnerW.B. (1988), ‘“Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol 13, No 4, pp 47–68.
GreveA. (1995), ‘Networks and entrepreneurship: An analysis of social relations, occupational background, and use of contacts during the establishment process’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol 11, No 1, pp 1–24.
25.
GrillichesZ. (1979), ‘Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth’, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol 10, pp 92–116.
26.
GrossmanG.HelpmanE. (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
27.
GrossmanG.HelpmanE. (1994), ‘Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth’, Journal of Economic Perspectives', Vol 8, pp 23–44.
28.
HarrisR.G. (2001), ‘The knowledge based economies: Intellectual origins and new economic perspectives’, International Journal of Management Review, Vol 3, pp 21–41.
29.
HEFCE (2003), Regional Profiles: East of England, Higher Education Funding Council for England, London.
30.
JaffeA.B. (1989), ‘Real effects of academic research’, American Economic Review, Vol 79, No 5, pp 957–970.
31.
KeebleD.WilkinsonF. (1999), ‘Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of regional clusters of high technology SMEs in Europe’, Regional Studies, Vol 33, pp 295–303.
32.
Kingshurst Consulting (2003), East of England Business Start-up Survey: Final Report, prepared for the East of England Development Agency, www.kingshurst.co.uk (accessed 13 June 2005).
33.
KlepperS. (2001), ‘Employee start-ups in high-tech industry’, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol 10, No 3, pp 639–634.
34.
LambertR. (2003), Lambert Review of Business–University Collaboration: Final Report, HM Treasury, London.
35.
LimK. (2000), The Many Faces of Absorptive Capacity: Spillovers of Copper Interconnect Technology for Semi-Conductor Chips, MIT, Cambridge, MA, mimeo.
36.
LinN. (2001), ‘Building a network theory of social capital’, in LinN.CookK.BurtR.S., eds, Social Capital Theory and Research, Aldine De Gruyter, New York, pp 3–29.
37.
LinN. (2003), Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
38.
LindholmD.Å. (1999), ‘Technology-based SMEs in the Göteborg region: Their origin and interaction with universities and large firms’, Regional Studies, Vol 33, No 4, pp 379–389.
39.
LucasR.E. (1988), ‘On the mechanics of economic development’, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol 22, pp 3–42.
40.
LucasR.E. (1993), ‘Making a miracle’, Econometrica, Vol 61, No 2, pp 251–272.
41.
MaskellP.MalmbergA. (1999), ‘Localised learning and industrial competitiveness’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol 23, No 2, pp 167–185.
42.
MitraJ. (2000), ‘Making connections: Innovation and collective learning in small businesses’, Education + Training, Vol 42, No 4/5, pp 228–237.
43.
Novalis Research (2004), ‘East of England ICT Study’, East of England Development Agency, Histon.
44.
OakeyR. (1995), High-Technology New Firms: Variable Barriers to Growth, Paul Chapman, London.
45.
ONS (2003), Region in Figures – East of England, Winter, No 7, Office for National Statistics, London.
46.
PolanyiM. (1962), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post Critical Philosophy, Routledge, London.
47.
PorterM.E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press, New York.
48.
ReynoldsP.D. (1991), ‘Sociology of entrepreneurship: Concepts and contributions’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol 16, No 2, pp 47–70.
49.
RomerP.M. (1990), ‘Endogenous technological change’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol 98, No 5, pp S71–S102.
50.
SaxenianA. (1994), Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
51.
Segal Quince Wicksteed (1985), The Cambridge Phenomenon: The Growth of High Technology Industry in a University Town, Segal Quince Wicksteed, Cambridge.
52.
StorperM. (1995), ‘The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies’, European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol 2, pp 191–221.
53.
StuartT.E.ShaneS. (2002), ‘Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups’, Management Science, Vol 48, No 2, pp 151–170.
54.
ThorntonP.H. (1999), ‘The sociology of entrepreneurship’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol 25, pp 19–46.
55.
VargaA. (2000), ‘Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity’, Journal of Regional Science, Vol 40, No 2, pp 289–309.
56.
Von HippelE. (1994), ‘Sticky information and locus of problem solving: Implications of innovation’, Management Science, Vol 40, pp 429–439.
57.
WennekersA.R.M. (1997), ‘The revival of entrepreneurship in the Netherlands’, in WelfensP.J.J.GraackC., eds, Technologieorientierte Unternehmensgründungen und Mittelstandspolitik in Europa, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.
58.
YenckenJ.T.ColeT.GillinM. (2002), ‘Spin-off companies from universities and other public research agencies in Australia: Findings from early stage case-studies’, paper presented at Twente University High-Tech Small Companies Conference, Enschede, 11–12 June.
59.
Yli-RenkoH.AutioE.SapienzaH.J. (2001), ‘Social capital, knowledge acquisition and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 22, pp 587–613.
60.
ZuckerL.DarbyM.BrewerM. (1998), ‘Intellectual capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises’, American Economic Review, Vol 88, pp 290–306.
