Structural changes in Mexico's economy and trade policies have influenced firms' efforts to achieve technological innovation and improve their learning processes. In this context, R&D centres face new challenges in responding to firms' technological needs. The authors analyse how this new environment is affecting the operating practices of R&D centres in their relationship with industry. The underlying assumption is that the strategic choices of an institution can be explained through an analysis of how it is influenced by the national innovation system, the broader national and international contexts in which it operates and its own particular history. A comparative analysis of two different centres is offered, focusing on the changes in and redefinition of their organizational priorities and practices.
AlbertiGiorgio (1999), ‘Desarrollo rural, instituciones y procesos de cambio institucional’ in Carmagnani, Marcelo and Gustavo Gordillo de Anda, coords, Desarrollo social y cambios productivos en el mundo rural europeo contemporáneo, FCE/CM, México.
2.
BartholomewSusan (1997), ‘The globalization of technology: A socio-cultural perspective’, in HowellsJeremyMichieJ., eds, Technology, Innovation and Competitiveness, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
3.
CamachoGustavo (1999), personal interview with CIMAV Assistant Director of Linkage, Chihuahua.
4.
CarrilloJorgeHualdeAlfredo (1997), ‘Maquiladoras de tercera generación: El caso Delphi-General’, Comercio Exterior, Vol 47, No 9, pp 747–757.
5.
CasaletMónica (2000), ‘The institutional matrix and its main functional activities supporting innovation’, in ChimoliMario, ed, The Mexican Innovation System: Mexico in a Global Context, Pinter Series Science, Technology and International Political Economy, London and New York.
6.
CasasR.De GortariR.SantosM.J. (2000), ‘The building of knowledge spaces in México: A regional approach to networking’, Research Policy, Vol 29, pp 225–241.
7.
CasasR., eds (2001), La formación de redes de Conocimiento: Una perspectiva regional desde México, UNAM-ANTHROPOS, Madrid.
8.
CastañosVíctor (2001), personal interview with the director of FATA, Querétaro, México.
CimoliMario, ed., (2000), The Mexican Innovation System: Mexico in a Global context, Pinter Series Science, Technology and International Political Economy, London and New York.
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (1998), Historia de las instituciones del sistema SEPCONACYT, SEPCONACYT, México.
15.
De GortariRebeca (1998), ‘Ejemplos de colaboración entre la academia, la industria y el gobierno en México: Hacia la construcción de ambientes regionales de innovación’, in AlcántaraA.PozasR.TorresC.A., coords, Educación, democracia y desarrollo en el fin de siglo, Siglo XXI, México.
16.
EdquistC.JohnsonB. (1997), ‘Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation’, in EdquistC., ed, Systems of Innovation, Pinter, London.
17.
ElzingaAantJamisonA. (1994), ‘Changing policy agendas in science and technology’, in JasanoffSheilaMarkleG.E.PetersenJ.PinchT., eds, Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Sage, London.
18.
FloresJulio (1998), personal interview with the sales and market research director at COMIMSA, Saltillo.
19.
FreemanC. (1997), ‘The national system of innovation in historical perspective’, in ArchibugiD.MichieJ., eds, Technology, Globalization and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20.
GarcíaArmando (1998), personal interview with the technological development manager at Interceramic, Chihuahua.
21.
JordánJavier (1998), personal interview with the technical manager at Tecnología de Moción Controlada, Chihuahua.
22.
JuárezHumberto (2000), Plantas gemelas, plataformas continentales y fábrica modular en la industria del automóvil Variantes de una estrategia empresarial en América del Norte, CIEPE-FE-BUAP, México.
23.
MarotoCarlos (1998–99), personal interviews with the general director at COMIMSA, Saltillo.
24.
OrrantiaErasmo (1998), personal interview with CIMAV researcher, Chihuahua.
25.
PérezCarlota (1996), ‘La modernización industrial en América Latina y la herencia de la sustitución de importaciones’, Comercio Exterior, Vol 46, No 5, pp 347–363.
26.
JaraRíosDavid (1999), personal interview with the director of CIMAV, Chihuahua.
27.
ThelenKathleenSteinmoSven (1992), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
28.
VillarealHoracio (1999), personal interview with the research and laboratory coordinator at COMIMSA, Saltillo.
29.
ZubietaJudithJiménezJaime (2003), ‘Acercamientos entre academia e industria el futuro de la vinculación’, in SantosMaría, coord, Perspectivas y desafíos de la educación, la ciencia y la tecnología, IIS-UNAM, México.
