This study seeks to explore the adoption of rice research-based innovations in rural Tanzania. Apart from the age and level of education of the head of household, which had an influence on the adoption of herbicide in both study areas, the influence of other variables on the adoption of fertilizer and transplanting varied between the study areas. Moreover, the study shows that adoption of the selected innovations is context-dependent. In Tanzania, rice farming is characterized by the predominance of traditional rice varieties. Farmers grow these varieties for household consumption or income, or both, under crop management practices that are well attuned to the available resources. The observed discontinuation and adaptation of innovations make sense, given the production circumstances in which the farmers operate. The findings of the study raise issues with research implications for improved rice production in the study areas.
AdatoM., and Meinzen-DickR. (2003), ‘Assessing the impact of agricultural research on poverty and livelihoods’, Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Vol 42, No 2, pp 149–166.
2.
AnderssonJ. A. (1996), ‘Potato cultivation in the Uporoto Mountains, Tanzania: An analysis of the social nature of agrotechnological change’, African Affairs, Vol 95, pp 85–106.
3.
AshimogoG.IsinikaA. C., and MlangwaJ. E. D. (2003), Africa in Transition Micro Study: Tanzania, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro.
4.
ChristoplosI., and NitschU. (1996), Pluralism and the Extension Agent: Changing Concepts and Approaches in Rural Extension, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
5.
DouthwaiteB. (2002), Enabling Innovation: A Practical Guide to Understanding and Fostering Technological Change, ZED Books, London.
6.
DouthwaiteB.KeatingJ. D. H., and ParkJ. R. (2001), ‘Why promising technologies fail: The neglected role of user innovation during adoption’, Research Policy, Vol 30, pp 819–836.
7.
EllisF. (1998), ‘Rural livelihood diversity in developing countries: Evidence and policy implications’, Natural Resources Perspectives, No 40, April 1999, available at Website: http://www.odi.org.uk/nrp/40.htm1.
8.
EllisF. (2000), Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9.
EriksenT. H., and NielsenF. S. (2001), A History of Anthropology, Pluto Press, London, and Sterling, VA.
10.
FarringtonJ.CarneyD.AshleyC., and TurtonC. (1999), ‘Sustainable livelihoods in practice: Early applications of concepts in rural areas’, Natural Resource Perspectives, No 42, June, available at Website: http://www.odi.org.uk/nrp/42.htm1.
11.
FederG.JustR. E., and ZilbermanD. (1984), Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey, World Bank, Washington, DC.
12.
FliegelF. C. (1993), Diffusion Research in Rural Sociology: The Record and Prospects for the Future, Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
13.
KaarhusR. (1994), Agricultural Development, Scientific Models and Local Knowledge, Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research, Oslo.
14.
KaarhusR. (1999), Conceiving Environmental Problems: A Comparative Study of Scientific Knowledge Constructions and Policy Discourses in Ecuador and Norway, Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research, Oslo.
15.
KalibaA. R. M.VerkuijlH.MwangiW.MoshiA. J.ChilaganeA.KaswendeJ. S., and AnandajayasekeramP. (1998), Adoption of Maize Production Technologies in Eastern Tanzania, CIMMYT, Mexico DF.
16.
Kanyeka (2004), personal communication.
17.
KanyekaZ. L. (nd), ‘Rice research in Tanzania: past, present and future strategies’, Department of Botany, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam.
18.
KanyekaZ. L.MsombaS. W.KihupiA. N., and PenzaM. S. (1995), ‘Rice ecosystems in Tanzania: Characterization and classification’, KATC Newsletter, Rice and People in Tanzania, Vol 1, No 1.
19.
KayekeS. (1998), ‘Rice farming and agricultural extension in Kikusya village, Kyela District, Mbeya Region’, paper presented at Sixth Rice Cultivation Training Course, KATC, Moshi, Tanzania.
20.
KirwayT. N. (1982), The Basis for Planning an Adaptive Research Programme on Rice for Small Farmers in Kyela, Uyole Agricultural Centre, Mbeya.
21.
Kisunjuru (2003), personal communication.
22.
LaizerR. K. L. (1999), ‘The role of participatory approaches in smallholder farmers' rice production in Morogoro Region: the case of the National Special Programme on Food Production in Mang'ula Division, Kilombero District’, unpublished MSc thesis, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
23.
LaparM. L. A., and EhuiS. K. (2004), ‘Factors affecting adoption of dual-purpose of forages in the Philippine uplands’, Agricultural Systems, Vol 81, pp 95–114.
24.
LigugudaM. P. M., and KisunjuruA. A. (1996), ‘Rice farming and agricultural extension in Man'gula Division, Kilombero District, Morogoro Region’, KATC Newsletter, Rice and People in Tanzania, Vol 1, No 4, pp 2–5.
25.
LongN. (1992), ‘From paradigm lost to paradigm regained? The case for an actor-oriented sociology of development’, in LongN., and LongA., eds, Battlefields of Knowledge: The Interlocking of Theory and Practice in Social Research and Development, Routledge, London, pp 16–43.
26.
MatteeA. Z. (1994), ‘The adoption of agricultural innovations by small farmers in Tanzania: An analysis of the research needs’, African Study Monographs, Vol 15, No 4, pp 167–176.
27.
MorrisM. L., and HeiseyP. W. (2003), ‘Estimating the benefits of plant breeding research. Methodological issues and practical challenges’, Agricultural Economics, Vol 29, pp 241–252.
28.
MsambichakaL. A. (1994), ‘Reflections on research challenges and strategies for Tanzania: An agenda for the 21st century’, in MsambichakaL. A.MoshiH. P. B., and MtafikoloF. P., eds, Development and Challenges and Strategies for Tanzania: An Agenda for the 21st Century, Dar er Salaam University Press, Dar es Salaam, pp 431–455.
29.
MsombaS. W.PenzaA. H.KibandaJ. M.TusekelegeA.MkuyaM.MbapilaJ. C., and KanyekaZ. L. (2002), ‘Proposal for release of an improved aromatic high yielding rice variety TXD 306 (SARO 5)’, paper presented at the National Variety Release Sub-Committee and National Seed Production Committee, 27–28 November, Selian, Arusha, Tanzania.
30.
MullahC. J. A. (1992), ‘An analysis of technical and socioeconomic factors in adoption and adaptation of alley-cropping in the high rainfall zone of Siaya District, Kenya’, unpublished thesis, Agricultural University of Norway, Ås.
31.
MusseiA. N., and MbogolloM. (2001), Adoption Constraints of Improved Rice Varieties in Kyela District, Southern Highlands, Tanzania, ARI Uyole, Mbeya.
32.
ObinneC. P. O. (1996), ‘Adoption of improved livestock management innovations in Nigeria: The Benue State experience’, Outlook on Agriculture, Vol 25, No 2, pp 119–122.
33.
Planning Commission and Kyela District Council (1997), Kyela District Socio-economic Profile, Government Printer, Dar es Salaam.
34.
RansomJ. K.PaudyalK., and AdhikariK. (2003), ‘Adoption of improved maize varieties in the hills of Nepal’, Agricultural Economics, Vol 29, pp 299–305.
35.
RhoadesR. (1991), ‘The role of farmers in the creation of agricultural technology’, in ChambersR.PaceyA., and ThruppL. A., eds, Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research, Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp 3–9.
36.
RogersE. M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, New York.
37.
SemgalaweZ. M. (1998), ‘Household adoption behaviour and agricultural sustainability in the northeastern mountains of Tanzania: the case of soil conservation in the North Pare and West Usambara Mountains’, unpublished PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen.
38.
WünscherT.Schultze-KraftR.PetersM., and RivasL. (2004), ‘Early adoption of the tropical forage legume Arachis Pintoi in Huetar Norte, Costa Rica’, Experimental Agriculture, Vol 40, pp 257–268.
