Measuring Engagement between Industry and Higher Education in the Built Environment Sector

Abstract

Recent education policy in the UK has encouraged universities and industry to work in partnership as a means of improving the quality of student learning and preparing graduates to enter the workplace. Indeed, both the Lambert Review of Business–University Collaboration (Lambert, 2003) and the White Paper on The Future of Higher Education (DfES, 2003) highlight the need for collaboration and closer working relationships. This paper reports on the results of a research effort to assess the extent of university–industry collaboration in the UK's built environment sector and to measure the impact of such activity. The ‘Accelerating Change in Built Environment Education’ (ACBEE) initiative sought to identify the nature of engagement activities in the built environment and to formulate, evaluate and develop guidelines for best practice. Forty case studies of engagement were collected from the built environment sector using a standard template, and many sustained engagement activities and established collaborations were identified. The paper explains how these case studies were categorized and evaluated to develop an understanding of the nature of the different types of engagement. A framework was subsequently developed for the classification of the case studies. Finally, the paper considers how the quality of such engagement can be measured and proposes appropriate key performance indicators.

Keywords

industry engagement industrial partnerships collaboration classification evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ACBEE (2004), First Annual Report, Accelerating Change in Built Environment Education, www.acbee.org.

ACBEE (2005), Second Annual Report, Accelerating Change in Built Environment Education, www.acbee.org.

Biggs

(1999), Teaching for Quality Learning at University, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham.

Construct IT (2000), Introduction to SPICE, Construct IT Centre of Excellence, University of Salford, Salford.

Construct IT (2001), SPICE FM, Construct IT Centre of Excellence, University of Salford, Salford.

DfES (2003), The Future of Higher Education, White Paper, Department for Education and Skills, London.

Egan

(1998), Rethinking Construction, Report of the Construction Task Force, HMSO, London.

Johnson

W.C.

(2003), ‘University relations: The HP model’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 17, No 6, December 2003, pp 391–395.

Kennerley

Neely

(2002), ‘Performance measurement frameworks: A review’, in Neely

, ed, Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

10.

King Martin

(1948), ‘The purpose of education’, The Maroon Tiger (student newspaper), Morehouse College, Atlanta, GA.

11.

Lambert

(2003), Review of Business–University Collaboration: Final Report, HM Treasury, London.

12.

Latham

(1994), Constructing the Team, HMSO, London.

13.

Popper

(1963), Conjectures and Refutations, 3rd edition, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

14.

Powell

J.A.

Money

(2004), ‘Developing an assessment process for diverse university reach-out: Discussion of a fourfold approach’, Consultation Paper for the UPBEAT Consortium, University of Salford, Salford.

15.

Race

, (1999), ‘Why assess innovatively?’, in Brown

Glasner

, eds, Assessment Matters in Higher Education, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham.

16.

Sachs

(2003), ‘The dignity of difference: How to avoid the clash of civilisations’, Continuum, London.

17.

Williams

(2006), ‘Progress through partnership: How do industry and UK higher education built environment courses work collaboratively?’, Special Issue on ‘University–Industry Cooperation in Enhancing Engineering Education’, International Journal of Engineering Education, forthcoming.