This article is concerned with the provision of open and distance learning by the higher education sectors in two countries, the UK and Finland. The central contention is that more strategic thought must be given to this issue if the potential benefits of such learning are to be maximized. The article considers in detail institutional practice in one UK university and compares it to practice in a Finnish institution to ascertain whether procedures and practices adopted in Finland might inform policies in UK universities. By way of conclusion, it is suggested that higher education institutions in both countries need to explore the importance of improved networking, develop better quality-assurance procedures and introduce changes in pedagogic practice.
BennettR.GlennesterH.NevisonD. (1992), Learning Should Pay, BP, London.
6.
BlaugM. (1970), An Introduction to the Economics of Training, Penguin, London.
7.
CandyP. (2000), ‘Learning and earning: Graduate skills for an uncertain future’, in AppletonK.MacphersonC.OrrD., eds, Selected Papers: Lifelong Learning Conference, Central Queensland University, Yeppoon.
8.
ChallisL. (2004), ‘It's early days for evolution’, Times Higher Education Supplement, 23 April, p 16.
9.
DahlmanA.RillingS. (2001), ‘Integrating technologies and tasks in an EFL distance learning course in Finland’, TESOL Journal, Spring, pp 4–8.
10.
DfEE (1998), The Learning Age: A Renaissance for Britain, Department for Education and Employment, London.
11.
DfEE (2001), Skills and Enterprise Briefing, Issue 1, Department for Education and Employment, London.
12.
DoC (1999), Falling Through The Net: Defining the Digital Divide, US Department of Commerce, www.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/contents (accessed September 2000).
13.
EC (2001), Memorandum on Lifelong Learning, European Commission, Brussels.
14.
Economist (1992), ‘A survey of education’, Special Supplement, The Economist, 21 November.
15.
EisenbarthG. (2003), ‘The online education market’, On the Horizon, Vol 11, No 3, pp 9–15.
16.
Employment Department (1991), Report of the Investigation into the Cost-Effectiveness of Open Learning for Producers, Employment Department, London.
17.
FinegoldD. (1993), ‘Breaking out of the low-skill equilibrium’, Education Economics, Vol 1, No 1, pp 193–196.
18.
FinegoldD. (1999), ‘Creating self-sustaining high-skill ecosystems’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol 15, No 1, pp 60–81.
19.
Finnish Information Technology Development Centre (2001), ICT Cluster Finland Review 2001, Finnish Information Technology Development Centre, Helsinki.
20.
Finnish Ministry of Education (1995), ‘Education, training and research in the information society’, http://www.minedu.fi (accessed November 2004).
21.
Finnish Ministry of Education (1997), Summary of the Report of the Lifelong Learning Committee, Finnish Ministry of Education, Helsinki.
22.
FryerR. (1997), Learning to Be: The World of Education Today and Tomorrow, National Advisory Group for Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning, London.
23.
HeterickR.MingleJ.TwiggC. (1997), The Public Policy Implications of a Global Learning Infrastructure, http://www.educause.edu/NLII (accessed November 2004).
24.
HoareS. (2005), ‘Paying online: Distance learning’, The Guardian, Education Section, 26 April, p 70.
25.
HowardS. (1993), ‘Accreditation of prior learning – andragogy in action or a cut-price approach to learning?’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol 18, No 11, pp 817–824.
LeonP. (2002), ‘Bid to create online standards’, Times Higher Education Supplement, 21 June, p 12.
28.
LittlefieldD. (1994), ‘Open learning by pc or paper?’, Personnel Management, September, pp 55–58.
29.
MunroN. (2003), ‘Colleges hit by lack of time for online skills’, Times Educational Supplement, 26 September, p 4.
30.
OsborneM. (2003), ‘Policy and practice in widening participation: A six country comparative study of access as flexibility’, International Journal of Lifelong Education, Vol 22, No 1, pp 43–58.
31.
OsborneM.SandbergH.TuomiO. (2004), ‘A comparison of developments in university continuing education in Finland, the UK and Sweden’, International Journal of Lifelong Education, Vol 23, No 2, pp 137–158.
32.
ParjanenM.TuomiO. (2003), ‘Access to higher education – persistent or changing inequality: A case study from Finland’, European Journal of Education, Vol 38, No 1, pp 55–70.
33.
PiesanenE. (2003), ‘Promoting access and academic success in regular university: The potential of the Finnish Open University’, Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, Vol 5, No 3, pp 41–45.
34.
PlimmerG. (2005), ‘Graduates seek degrees of relevance’, Financial Times, 21 March, p 8.
35.
PohjolainenS.RuokamoH. (2000), ‘Distance learning in a multimedia networks project’, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol 31, No 2, pp 117–125.
36.
PohjonenJ. (1997), ‘New learning environments as a strategic choice’, European Journal of Education, Vol 32, No 4, pp 369–378.
37.
PraisS. (1995), Productivity, Education and Training: An International Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
38.
SaartiJ. (2000), ‘Developing a regional information service for Eastern Finland’, Scandinavian Public Library Quarterly, Vol 3, pp 28–30.
39.
SaundersM.LewisP.ThornhillA. (2003), Research Methods for Business Students, Financial Times Prentice-Hall, London.
40.
SchuetzeH.SloweyM. (2002), ‘Participation and exclusion: A comparative analysis of non-traditional students and lifelong learners in higher education’, Higher Education, Vol 44, pp 309–327.
41.
ShackletonJ.WalshS. (1995), National Vocational Qualifications: The Story So Far, paper presented to an Economics and Social Science Research Council seminar, London.
42.
SlaterJ. (2005), ‘How to avoid a pig in a poke’, Times Higher Education Supplement, 29 April, p 6.
43.
TulkkiP. (2001), ‘The Finnish way to the information society: Expanding engineer education’, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 26, No 1, pp 39–52.
44.
TysomeT. (2001), ‘Distance learning fails students’, Times Higher Education Supplement, 5 January, p 7.
45.
UCLan (1999), Access to Excellence, University of Central Lancashire, Preston.
46.
UCLan (2002), E-Learning Strategy, University of Central Lancashire, Preston.
47.
Van de WendeM.BeerkensE. (1999), ‘An international orientation on institutional strategies and government policies for the use of ICT in higher education’, Interactive Learning Environments, Vol 7, No 2, pp 283–321.
48.
WellerM. (2004), ‘Facing a byte-sized future’, Times Higher Education Supplement, 22 October, p 4.
49.
WoodhallM. (1990), ‘Human capital concepts’, in EslandG., ed, Education, Training and Development, Addison Wesley, London.
50.
World Economic Forum (2004), Global Information Technology Report, http://www.weforum.org (accessed January 2005).
