Modelling Country Risk and Uncertainty in Small Island Tourism Economies

Abstract

Small island tourism economies (SITEs) differ significantly from each other in many respects, such as their size, location, political systems, historical experience, economic prospects, ecological fragility, and vulnerability to ethnic conflicts, crime and the threat of global terrorism. Given these differences, a careful analysis of country risk (or uncertainty) and its components for SITEs is of substantial interest to private tourism operators and foreign direct investors in the tourism and hospitality industry, tourism commissions and governments. This paper provides a comparison of country risk ratings, risk returns and their associated volatilities (or uncertainty) for six SITEs for which monthly data compiled by the International Country Risk Guide are available. Monthly economic, financial, political and composite country risk returns are used to estimate univariate symmetric and asymmetric models of uncertainty. The empirical results provide a comparative assessment of the country risk returns and uncertainty for the six SITEs.

Keywords

small island economies GARCH GJR regularity conditions risk ratings risk returns

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armstrong

H.W.

Read

(1995), ‘Western European micro-states and autonomous regions: The advantages of size and sovereignty’, World Development, Vol 23, No 7, pp 1229–1245.

Armstrong

H.W.

Read

(1998), ‘Trade and growth in small states: The impact of global trade liberalization’, World Economy, Vol 21, No 4, pp 563–585.

Armstrong

H.W.

Read

(2002), ‘The phantom of liberty? Economic growth and the vulnerability of small states’, Journal of International Development, Vol 14, No 3, pp 435–458.

Berndt

E.K.

Hall

B.H.

Hall

R.E.

Hausman

J.A.

(1974), ‘Estimation and inference in nonlinear structural models’, Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol 3, pp 653–665.

Bollerslev

(1986), ‘Generalised autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity’, Journal of Econometrics, Vol 31, pp 307–327.

Bollerslev

Chou

R.Y.

Kroner

K.F.

(1992), ‘ARCH modelling in finance: A review of the theory and empirical evidence’, Journal of Econometrics, Vol 52, pp 5–59.

Bollerslev

Engle

R.F.

Nelson

D.B.

(1994), ‘ARCH models’, in Engle

R.F.

McFadden

D.L.

, eds, Handbook of Econometrics, Vol 4, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1994, pp 2961–3038.

Bollerslev

Wooldridge

J.M.

(1992), ‘Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time-varying covariances’, Econometric Reviews, Vol 11, pp 143–173.

Brewer

T.L.

Rivoli

(1990), ‘Politics and perceived country creditworthiness in international banking’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol 22, pp 357–369.

10.

Burton

F.N.

Inoue

(1985), ‘An appraisal of the early-warning indicators of sovereign loan default in country risk evaluation systems’, Management International Review, Vol 25, pp 45–56.

11.

Chan

Hoti

McAleer

(2002), ‘Structure and asymptotic theory for multivariate asymmetric volatility: Empirical evidence for country risk ratings’, paper presented to the Australasian Meeting of the Econometric Society, Brisbane, July.

12.

Commonwealth Secretariat/World Bank Joint Task Force on Small States (2000), Small States: Meeting Challenges in the Global Economy, Commonwealth Secretariat, London, and World Bank, Washington, DC.

13.

Engle

R.F.

(1982), ‘Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation’, Econometrica, Vol 50, pp 987–1007.

14.

Glosten

Jagannathan

Runkle

(1992), ‘On the relation between the expected value and volatility of nominal excess return on stocks’, Journal of Finance, Vol 46, pp 1779–1801.

15.

Hoti

McAleer

(2004), ‘An empirical assessment of country risk ratings and associated models’, Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol 18, pp 539–588.

16.

Jeantheau

(1998), ‘Strong consistency of estimators for multivariate ARCH models’, Econometric Theory, Vol 14, pp 70–86.

17.

Krayenbuehl

T.E.

(1985), Country Risk: Assessment and Monitoring, Lexington Books, Toronto.

18.

W.K.

Ling

McAleer

(2002), ‘Recent theoretical results for time series models with GARCH errors’, Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol 16, pp 245–269. Reprinted in McAleer

Oxley

, eds, Contributions to Financial Econometrics: Theoretical and Practical Issues, Blackwell, Oxford, 2002, pp 9–33.

19.

Ling

McAleer

(2002a), ‘Necessary and sufficient moment conditions for GARCH (r,s) and asymmetric power of GARCH(r,s) models’, Econometric Theory, Vol 18, pp 722–729.

20.

Ling

McAleer

(2002b), ‘Stationarity and the existence of moments of a family of GARCH processes’, Journal of Econometrics, Vol 106, pp 109–117.

21.

Ling

McAleer

(2003), ‘Asymptotic theory for a vector ARMA-GARCH model’, Econometric Theory, Vol 19, pp 278–308.

22.

McAleer

Chan

Marinova

(2002), ‘An econometric analysis of asymmetric volatility: Theory and applications to patents’, paper presented to the Australasian Meeting of the Econometric Society, Brisbane, July, to appear in Journal of Econometrics.