Government Incentivization of Partnerships in South Africa

Abstract

Worldwide, innovation policy is perceived to be at the heart of economic growth and global competitiveness, and nations invest vast amounts of money to give effect to innovation. Higher education institutions, in partnership with industry, are expected to play a key role in supporting the national system of innovation and developing the nation's global competitiveness. This paper draws on the audit of higher education-industry partnerships conducted by the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) of South Africa during 2002–03. It plots the South African government's programme of incentives for industry-higher education partnerships through two funding programmes: the Technology and Human Resources for Industry Programme (THRIP) and the Innovation Fund. It argues that, notwithstanding considerable outputs, such as publications, patents/artefacts and the involvement of postgraduate students, it is vital that the incentivization of higher education-industry partnerships is managed in such a way that past relations of inequality among higher education institutions and in the broader society are not reproduced.

Keywords

HE–industry partnerships innovation global competitiveness THRIP Innovation Fund South Africa

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berger

, ed (2003), South African yearbook 2003/2004, 10th edition, Government Communications and Information System, Pretoria.

Bunting

(2002), The higher education landscape under apartheid’, in Cloete

, eds, Transformation in Higher Education: Global Pressures and Local Realities in South Africa, Juta, Lansdowne.

Castells

(1996), The Rise of the Network Society, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.

Cloete

Fehnel

(2002), ‘The emergent landscape’, in Cloete

, eds, Transformation in Higher Education: Global Pressures and Local Realities in South Africa, Juta, Lansdowne.

DTI (1998), Guide to Research Support, THRIP, Department of Trade and Industry, Pretoria.

HSRC (2003), Working Partnerships: Higher Education Industry and Innovation, Human Sciences Research Council, Cape Town.

Kruss

(2002), ‘Employment and employability: Expectations of higher education responsiveness’, paper commissioned by the Council on Higher Education (CHE), Pretoria.

Maaba

B.B.

(2001), ‘The archives of the Pan Africanist Congress and the Black Consciousness-oriented movements’, History in Africa, Vol 28, pp 417–438.

Morrow

(2002), ‘Heritage and historically black universities (HBUs): The view from Fort Hare’, Historia, Vol 47, No 2, pp 446–456.

10.

Morrow

Gxabalashe

(2000), ‘The records of the University of Fort Hare’, History in Africa, Vol 27, pp 481–497.

11.

NCHE (1996), A Framework for Higher Education Transformation, National Commission on Higher Education, Pretoria.

12.

Stones

(2003), ‘Other countries could emulate SA's centres of excellence’, Business Day, 25 September.

13.

Thaver

(2003), ‘Racial legacy leaves universities with skewed staff profile’, Cape Times, 24 July.

14.

THRIP (1997), Evaluation of THRIP: Final Report, Technology and Human Resources for Industry Programme, Pretoria.

15.

THRIP (1998), Strategic Plan for 1997–2001, Technology and Human Resources for Industry Programme, Pretoria.

16.

THRIP (2002a), Evaluation of THRIP: Final Report, Technology and Human Resources for Industry Programme, Pretoria.

17.

THRIP (2002b), THRIP Guide to Research Support, Technology and Human Resources for Industry Programme, Pretoria.

18.

THRIP (2003), Strategic Plan 2003–2007, Technology and Human Resources for Industry Programme, Pretoria.