The objective of this study is to analyse the influence of a multinational corporation (MNC) on the productive network of the host territory and the proliferation of entrepreneurs. In particular, an attempt has been made to analyse the influence on the exporting activities of local SMEs – both suppliers and non-suppliers. The study has shown that strategic integrated suppliers show greater exporting tendencies than those that are not considered to be strategic suppliers for an MNC. Similarly, those companies whose founder and/or part of the executive team have worked previously in a multinational corporation show greater levels of export activity compared with those founded by local entrepreneurs.
AitkenB.HansonG.HarrisonA. E. (1997), ‘Spillovers, foreign investment and export behavior’, Journal of International Economics, Vol 43, Nos 1–2, pp 103–132.
2.
ÁlvarezR.LópezR. (2003), An Empirical Reassessment of the Relationship Between Exports and Firm Performance: The Case of Chile, paper presented at the Midwest International Economics Group Fall Meeting, Indiana University, IN.
3.
BarryF.BradleyJ. (1997), ‘FDI and trade: The Irish host-country experience’, The Economic Journal, Vol 107, No 3, pp 347–366.
4.
BecchettiL.RossiS. (2000), ‘The positive effect of industrial district on the export performance of Italian firms’, Review of Industrial Organisation, Vol 16, No 1, pp 53–68.
5.
BediA. S.CieslikA. (2000), Foreign Direct Investment and Host Country Regional Export Performance: Evidence from Poland, paper presented at the Midwest International Economics Group Fall Meeting, University of Minnesota, MN.
6.
BernardA. B.BradfordJ. (2001), Why Some Firms Export, Working Paper No 8349, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge.
7.
BlomströmM.KokkoA. (1998), ‘Multinational corporations and externalities’, Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol 12, pp 247–277.
8.
BonaccorsiA. (1992), ‘On the relationship between firm size and export intensity’, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol 23, No 4, pp 605–635.
9.
CavesR. (1974), ‘Multinational firms, competition and productivity in host country industries’, Economica, No 41, May, pp 176–193.
10.
ErikssonK.JohansonJ.MajkgardA.SharmaD. D. (1997), ‘Experiential knowledge and cost in the internationalization process’, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol 28, No 2, pp 337–360.
11.
FernándezZ.NietoM. J. (2002), International Involvement of SMEs: The Impact of Ownership, Working Paper No 02–58(21), Business Economics Series, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.
12.
FujitaM.KrugmanP.VenablesA. (1999), The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade, MIT Press, Cambridge.
13.
GorgH.StroblE. (2002), ‘Externalities from foreign firms through worker mobility: An empirical investigation’, Research Paper Series Globalisation, Productivity and Technology, Research Paper 2002/13, Leverhulme Centre for Research on Globalisation and Economic Policy, University of Nottingham.
14.
HendersonV.KuncoroA.TurnerM. (1995), ‘Industrial development in cities’, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol 103, No 5, pp 1067–1091.
15.
HittM. A.HoskissonR. E.KimH. (1997), ‘International diversification effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 40, No 4, pp 767–798.
16.
KathuriaV. (2000), ‘Productivity externalities from technology transfer to Indian manufacturing firms’, Journal of International Development, Vol 12, pp 343–369.
17.
KatzJ. M., ed (1987), Technology Creation in Latin America Manufacturing Industries, St. Martin's Press, New York.
18.
KogutB.ZanderU. (1993), ‘Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation’, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol 24, No 4, pp 625–645.
19.
LautanenT. (2000), ‘Modelling small firms' decision to export: Evidence from manufacturing firms in Finland’, Small Business Economics, Vol 14, No 2, pp 107–124.
20.
LinJ. C. (2000), Inter-Firm Externalities and Export Growth: Evidence from the Taiwanese Electronics Industry, paper presented at the Graduate Student Conference in Economics, Yale University.
21.
RheeY. W.BelotT. (1990), Export Catalysts in Low-Income Countries, World Bank Discussion Papers, No 72, World Bank, Washington, DC.
22.
RugmanA. M.D'cruzJ. R. (1997), ‘The theory of the flagship firm’, European Management Review, Vol 15, No 4, pp 403–411.
23.
RugmanA. M.D'cruzJ. R. (2000), Multinationals as Flagship Firms: Regional Business Networks, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24.
SmarzynskaB. K. (2002), Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Externalities Through Backward Linkages, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2923, World Bank, Washington, DC.
25.
SoreideT. (2001), FDI and Industrialisation. Why Technology Transfer and New Industrial Structures May Accelerate Economic Development, Working Paper 2001:3, Development Studies and Human Rights, Chr. Michelsen Institute, Norway.
26.
SousaN.GreenawayD.WakelinK. (2000), Multinationals and Export Externalities, Research Paper 2000/14, Centre for Research on Globalisation and Labour Markets, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
