This paper offers a critique of existing approaches to training in small firms. It is primarily concerned with the relationship between organizational and managerial development and examines the contribution and value of training processes. The underlying premise is the belief that training can and should be a powerful agent of change, facilitating and enabling a company to develop its capabilities, thus enhancing profitability.
BatchelorC. (1991), ‘Business schools drop courses’, Financial Times, 12 June.
2.
BeaverG. (1984), ‘The entrepreneurial ceiling: A discussion of the small business management process’, 7th National Small Firms Policy and Research Conference, Nottingham.
3.
BeaverG.HarrisonY. (1994), ‘TEC support for women entrepreneurs: Help or hindrance?’17th National Small Firms Policy and Research Conference, Sheffield.
4.
BeaverG.JenningsP. L. (1996), ‘The abuse of entrepreneurial power – an explanation of management failure?’Strategic Change, Vol 5, No 3, pp 151–164.
5.
BeaverG.JenningsP. L. (2000), ‘Editorial overview: Small business, entrepreneurship and enterprise development’, Strategic Change, Vol 9, No 7, pp 398–406.
6.
BeaverG.LashleyC. (1998), ‘Competitive advantage and management development in small hospitality firms: The need for an imaginative approach’, Journal of Vacation Marketing, Vol 4, No 2, pp 145–160.
7.
BeaverG.RossE. C. (2000), ‘Enterprise in recession: The role and context of strategy’, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol 1, No 1, pp 23–31.
8.
Bolton Report (1971), Report of the Committee of Inquiry on Small Firms, HMSO, London.
9.
BoyatzisR. (1982), The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance, Wiley, Chichester.
10.
CowlingM. (2000), ‘The entrepreneur and the smaller firm’, PhD thesis (unpublished), Warwick Business School, University of Warwick.
11.
DaweR. (1992), ‘Competence gets its reward’, Management Today, July.
12.
GreinerL. (1972), ‘Evolution and revolution as organisations grow’, Harvard Business Review, July/August.
13.
HandyC. (1987), The Making of Managers, NEDO, London.
14.
JacksonM. P. (1991), Measuring Management Performance, Kogan Page, London.
15.
JenningsP. L.BeaverG.RichardsonW. (1992), ‘Improving the role of accreditation in the training and development of small business owner/managers’, 15th National UKEMRA Small Firms Policy and Research Conference, Southampton.
16.
JenningsP. L.BeaverG. (1993a), ‘The abuse of entrepreneurial power’, 3rd Small Business and Small Business Development Conference, Leicester.
17.
JenningsP. L.BeaverG. (1993b), ‘Picking winners: The art of identifying successful entrepreneurs’, 16th ISBA Small Firms Policy and Research Conference, Nottingham.
18.
JenningsP. L.BeaverG. (1997), ‘The performance and competitive advantage of small firms: A management perspective’, International Small Business Journal, Vol 15, No 2, pp 63–75.
19.
KirbyD. A. (1990), ‘Management education and small business development: An explanatory study of small firms’, UK Journal of Small Business Management, Vol 28, No 4, pp 78–87.
20.
MatlayH. (2000), ‘Training and the small firm’, in CarterS.Jones-EvansD., Enterprise and Small Business, Financial Times/Pearson, London.
21.
National Westminster Bank (2000), National Survey of Small Businesses, London.
22.
PedlerM.BurgoyneJ.BoydellT. (1991), The Learning Company, McGraw-Hill, London.
23.
StanworthM. J. K.GrayC. (1991), Bolton 20 Years On, Small Business Research Trust, Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd, London.
24.
ScheinE. H. (1985), Organisational Culture and Leadership, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
25.
StoreyD. J. (1994), Understanding the Small Business Sector, Routledge, London.
