Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of laser therapy and Biosilicate^® on the biomechanical properties of bone callus in osteopenic rats.

Methods

Fifty female Wistar rats were equally divided into 5 groups (n=10/group): osteopenic rats with intact tibiae (SC); osteopenic rats with unfilled and untreated tibial bone defects (OC); osteopenic rats whose bone defects were treated with Biosilicate^® (B); osteopenic rats whose bone defects were treated with 830-nm laser, at 120 J/cm² (L120) and osteopenic rats whose bone defects were treated with Biosilicate^® and 830-nm laser, at 120 J/cm² (BL120). Ovariectomy (OVX) was used to induce osteopenia. A non-critical bone defect was created on the tibia of the osteopenic animals 8 weeks after OVX. In Biosilicate^® groups, bone defects were completely filled with the biomaterial. For the laser therapy, an 830-nm laser, 120 J/cm² was used. On day 14 postsurgery, rats were euthanized, and tibiae were removed for biomechanical analysis.

Results

Maximal load and energy absorption were higher in groups B and BL120, according to the indentation test. Animals submitted to low-level laser therapy (LLLT) did not show any significant biomechanical improvement, but the association between Biosilicate^® and LLLT was shown to be efficient to enhance callus biomechanical properties. Conversely, no differences were found between study groups in the bending test.

Conclusions

Biosilicate^® alone or in association with low level laser therapy improves biomechanical properties of tibial bone callus in osteopenic rats.

Keywords

Biomaterial Biomechanical properties Bone healing Low-level laser therapy Osteopenia

Introduction

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disorder characterized by low bone mass, deterioration of the microarchitecture of bone tissue and increased susceptibility to fragility fractures (1). Osteoporosis prevalence and fracture complications, such as pain and disability, depression, dependency and deterioration of the quality of life (2), are rapidly increasing worldwide and represent a severe health problem among elderly people (3).

In this context, there is a critical need for technologies that are able to enhance osteoporotic fracture healing. Our research group has developed a novel fully crystallized bioactive glass-ceramic of the quaternary P₂O₅-Na₂O-CaO-SiO₂ system (Biosilicate^®, patent application WO 2004/074199). Biosilicate^® has shown a stimulatory effect on bone cell metabolism (4). By comparing the growth of osteogenic cells on Biosilicate^® and Bioglass^® 45S5 disks (gold standard bioactive material) for a period of up to 17 days, Moura et al (4) found that Biosilicate^® supported larger areas of calcified matrix, indicating that the full crystallization of bioactive glasses in a range of compositions of the system P₂O₅-Na₂O-CaO-SiO₂ may promote enhancement of in vitro bone-like tissue formation. Moreover, Granito et al (5) showed that the fully crystallized Biosilicate^® also has good in vivo bone-forming and bone-bonding properties, supporting higher bone formation than the gold-standard Bioglass^® 45S5.

Similarly, a significant body of evidence has been now accumulated demonstrating that low-level laser therapy (LLLT) also has a positive effect on bone tissue metabolism and on fracture consolidation (6-8). When a laser is applied to biological tissue, the light is absorbed by chromophore photoreceptors located in the cells. Once absorbed, the light can modulate cell biochemical reactions and stimulate mitochondrial respiration, with the production of molecular oxygen and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) (9, 10). These effects are known to increase the synthesis of DNA, RNA and cell-cycle regulatory proteins, therefore promoting cell proliferation (10). Different in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that LLLT was capable of increasing mitochondrial activity (11), bone nodule formation (12), bone sialoprotein and osteopontin expression and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity (13). Additionally, LLLT has been demonstrated to be able to accelerate the process of fracture repair in rabbits and rats, increasing the callus volume and bone mineral density (6, 14).

Other studies have investigated the effects of LLLT in animal models of bone disease. Our group showed that LLLT increased femoral strength, calcium content and bone density in osteopenic rats (15, 16). Moreover, Diniz et al (17) demonstrated that the association of bisphosphonate and laser can also increase the vertebral trabecular bone volume in osteopenic rats.

Despite the positive effects of Biosilicate^® and LLLT on bone regeneration, it is still necessary to investigate in vivo biomechanical effects and dose-response characteristics of these 2 therapeutic modalities before they can be used with confidence to improve fracture healing. Based on the effects of LLLT or Biosilicate^® used as single therapies, we hypothesized that the association of these 2 therapies could increase the strength of the tibial callus in osteopenic rats. In this context, this study aimed to investigate the effects of Biosilicate^® and 830-nm laser on the biomechanical properties of tibial bone defects in osteopenic rats.

Materials and Methods

Biomaterial

High-purity silica and reagent grade calcium carbonate, sodium carbonate and sodium phosphate were used to obtain glass compositions: Biosilicate^® parent glass. The chemicals were weighed and mixed for 30 minutes in a polyethylene bottle. Premixed batches were melted in a Pt crucible at a temperature range of 1250°C to 1380°C for 3 hours in an electric furnace (Rapid Temp 1710 BL; CM Furnaces Inc., Bloomfield, NJ, USA) at the Vitreous Materials Laboratory of the Federal University of São Carlos (São Carlos, SP, Brazil). Samples were cast into a 10×30 mm cylindrical graphite mold and annealed at 460°C for 5 hours. To obtain the fully crystallized Biosilicate^® glass-ceramic, Biosilicate^® parent glass cylinders underwent cycles of thermal treatment to promote their crystallization. The first thermal cycle was performed at a relatively low temperature, just above the glass transition temperature to promote volumetric nucleation of crystals. Afterward, the nucleated samples were submitted to further treatment at about 100^oC above the nucleation temperatures. The detailed compositions and thermal treatment schedules to obtain the Biosilicate^® glass-ceramic are described in the patent WO 2004/074199.

Surgical procedures

This study was conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the US National Institutes of Health and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Sao Carlos (no. 025/2006). Animals were provided by the Central Animal Facility of the Federal University of São Carlos and maintained at 20°C-22°C on a 12-hour/12-hour light/dark cycle in the Animal Experimentation Laboratory of the same university. They were housed in plastic cages and had free access to water and standard food.

Fifty female Wistar rats (12 weeks old, 250 g body weight) were submitted to ovariectomy (OVX) to induce osteopenia. OVX is the most common experimental model used for experimental osteoporosis research (15, 16, 18 -20). This model mimics the bone loss and impaired fracture repair prevalent in postmenopausal women who are estrogen deficient and prone to osteoporotic fractures. Surgery was performed via bilateral translumbar incisions, under general anesthesia induced by intraperitoneal (IP) injection of Xilazin (Syntec^®, 20 mg/kg, IP) and ketamine (Agener^®, at 40 mg/kg, IP). The uterine tubes were ligated (catgut 4.0), the ovaries were removed and the incisions were closed (catgut 3.0). After surgery, all animals were conditioned during 8 weeks with the purpose of inducing osteopenia (15, 16, 18, 19).

Eight weeks after OVX, animals were randomly divided into 5 groups (n=10): osteopenic intact control (SC, intact osteopenic tibiae); osteopenic bone defect control (OC, osteopenic tibiae that were submitted to the surgical creation of bone defects without any treatment); osteopenic bone defect treated with Biosilicate^® (B); osteopenic bone defect treated with laser at 120 J/cm² (L120); and osteopenic bone defect treated with both Biosilicate^® and laser at 120 J/cm² (BL120).

A unicortical non-critical-sized bone defect was surgically created at the upper third of both tibiae (10 mm distal of the knee joint). Surgery was performed under sterile conditions, and general anesthesia induced by IP injection of Xilazin (Syntec^®, 20 mg/kg, IP) and ketamine (Agener^®, at 40 mg/kg, IP). The medial compartment of the tibia was exposed through a longitudinal incision on the shaved skin and muscle tissue. A standardized 2.0-mm-diameter unicortical bone defect was created by using a motorized drill (13,560 rpm) under copious irrigation with saline solution, exposing the medullary cavity, without affecting the opposite cortex. In Biosilicate^® treated animals, the cavities were completely filled with the biomaterial. The cutaneous flap was replaced and sutured with resorbable polyglactin, and the skin was disinfected with povidone-iodine. Heating lamps were used to prevent hypothermia in the postoperative period, and animals were supervised until full anesthesia recovery. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were for analgesia. The health status of the rats was monitored daily.

Low-level laser therapy

A low-energy GaAlAs (Teralaser; DMC^® São Carlos, SP, Brazil), 830 nm, CW, 0.028 cm² beam, 100 W/cm², 120 J/cm² (3.4 J) with an irradiation time of 34 seconds was used in this study (8). Laser irradiation was initiated immediately after the bone defect procedure, and it was performed on days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 postsurgery. On day 14 after the injury, rats were euthanized with an IP injection of general anesthetic. The tibiae were defleshed and removed for analysis.

Biomechanical test

Biomechanical properties of the right tibia were determined by an Instron Universal Testing Machine (Model 4444; Instron Corp., Canton, MA, USA). Before the test, bones were thawed at room temperature. The indentation test was performed with a cylindrical indenter of 2.0-mm diameter that was applied to the center of the bone callus, at a constant displacement velocity of 1 mm/min. A 1-N pre-load was applied to avoid specimen sliding. A special device was used to locate the tibiae, prior to submitting their medial surface (repair area) to penetration. The indenter was allowed to penetrate the cavity to a depth of 1.5 mm. From the load–penetration curve, the maximal load (kN) and energy absorption (J) were obtained to a depth of 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm.

After that, the 3-point bending test with a-1 kN load (1-kN load cell; Model 4444; Instron Corp., Canton, MA, USA) was performed. Tibiae were placed on a 3.8-cm metal device, which provided a 1.8-cm distance between the 2 supports. The load cell was perpendicularly positioned in the anteroposterior direction at the exact site of the bone defect. A 5-N pre-load was applied to avoid specimen sliding. Finally, the bending force was applied at a constant deformation rate of 0.5 cm/min until fracture occurred. From the load–deformation curve, the maximum load at failure (N) was obtained.

Statistical analysis

The results are given as means and standard error (SE). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare changes among the groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test to identify the differences. STATISTICA version 7.0 (data analysis software system; StatSoft Inc.) was used to carry out the statistical analysis. A P level of ≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The indentation test showed that, at a depth of 0.5 mm, the maximal load was higher in the SC and BL120 groups when compared with OC and L120 (Fig. 1A). The maximal load obtained from indentation test at a depth of 1.0 mm was higher in animals treated with Biosilicate^® and Biosilicate^® associated with laser therapy (BL120) in comparison with the OC and L120 groups (Fig. 1B). Maximal load was lower in the OC and laser-irradiated animals (L120) in comparison with the animals of the SC group (Fig. 1A, B).

Fig. 1

Maximal load obtained from the indentation test at a depth of 0.5 mm (A) and 1 mm (B). SC = osteopenic rats with intact tibiae; OC = osteopenic rats with unfilled and untreated tibial bone defects; B = osteopenic rats whose bone defects were treated with Biosilicate^®; L120 = osteopenic rats whose bone defects were treated with 830-nm laser, at 120 J/cm²; BL120 = osteopenic rats whose bone defects were treated with Biosilicate^® and 830-nm laser, at 120 J/cm². *P≤0.05 vs. group SC; ^#P≤0.05 vs. group OC and L120; ^@P≤0.05 vs. group L120; ⁺P≤0.05 vs. group B.

The energy absorption obtained from the indentation test at a depth of 0.5 mm was significantly lower in the OC, B and L120 groups when compared with osteopenic animals with intact tibiae (group SC; Fig. 2A). Bone callus from animals treated with both laser and Biosilicate^® showed higher energy absorption in comparison with bone callus from animals that received only the laser therapy (Fig. 2A). Similarly, the indentation test at a depth of 1.0 mm showed that the energy absorption was higher in animals treated with Biosilicate^® and irradiated with laser in comparison with the OC and L120 groups (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2

Energy absorption obtained from the indentation test at a depth of 0.5 mm (A) and 1 mm (B). SC = osteopenic rats with intact tibiae; OC = osteopenic rats with unfilled and untreated tibial bone defects; B = osteopenic rats whose bone defects were treated with Biosilicate^®; L120 = osteopenic rats whose bone defects were treated with 830-nm laser, at 120 J/cm²; BL120 = osteopenic rats whose bone defects were treated with Biosilicate^® and 830-nm laser, at 120 J/cm². *P≤0.05 vs. group SC; ^#P≤0.05 vs. group OC and L120; ^@P≤0.05 vs. group L120.

The 3-point bending test, however, revealed no significant difference for maximal load or energy of absorption among the groups (Tab. I).

TABLE I

MAXIMAL LOAD AND ENERGY OF ABSORPTION OBTAINED IN THE 3-POINT BENDING TEST

	Maximal load (kN)	Energy of absorption (J)
SC	0.107 ± 0.051	0.020 ± 0.002
OC	0.069 ± 0.007	0.024 ± 0.003
B	0.054 ± 0.005	0.020 ± 0.003
L120	0.064 ± 0.007	0.021 ± 0.003
BL120	0.040 ± 0.006	0.015 ± 0.003
P value	0.40	0.17

Values are means ± SE.

SC = osteopenic rats with intact tibiae; OC = osteopenic rats with unfilled and untreated tibial bone defects; B = osteopenic rats whose bone defects were treated with Biosilicate^®; L120 = osteopenic rats whose bone defects were treated with 830-nm laser, at 120 J/cm²; BL120 = osteopenic rats whose bone defects were treated with Biosilicate^® and 830-nm laser, at 120 J/cm².

Discussion

Since previous in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated the high osteogenic potential of Biosilicate^® (4, 5, 20), we hypothesized that the positive effects of this biomaterial could be improved by laser irradiation. In this context, the aim of this study was to evaluate if concomitant administration of Biosilicate^® and LLLT was able to improve the biomechanical properties of bone callus in osteopenic rats.

We demonstrated that laser therapy, used at the dose of 120 J/cm², was not effective in improving the biomechanical properties of the tibial callus in osteopenic animals. Interestingly, Biosilicate^® and the associated treatment (biomaterial plus laser therapy) could improve biomechanical properties of the bone callus, with an advantage for the associated treatment.

Some studies have showed that laser therapy is able to increase bone cell proliferation and to stimulate cell osteogenic properties (21 -23). LLLT creates a number of environmental conditions that accelerate the healing of bone fractures and defects. However, the exact mechanism of action is not fully understood. Probably, laser can stimulate mesenchymal cells or osteoblasts, increasing bone mass deposition and secretion of components of the matrix (24). Barbos Pinheiro et al (7) observed in a histological study that laser therapy accelerated bone repair and increased new bone formation. In addition, Lirani-Galvão et al (25) found that LLLT produced a significant increase in osteoblast numbers in tibial bone defects in rats. Similar findings were observed by Pretel et al (26). Luger et al (8) showed that laser therapy improved maximal load at failure and the structural stiffness of bone. The lack of effects in the laser-irradiated animals of the present study can probably be explained by the experimental postsurgery period (14 days) studied, which was not sufficient to induce modifications in callus bone strength. In addition, the disparate nature of the results may be due to a range of factors, including the treatment regime, the LLLT wavelength employed and/or differences in the model of osteotomy/fracture used.

Interestingly, Biosilicate^® was able to increase biomechanical properties within the experimental period of the present study. These results are in agreement with those found by Granito et al, (5), which showed that bones with surgically created bone defects filled with Biosilicate^® particulate exhibited large volumes of newly formed bone tissue and enhanced biomechanical properties.

Improved bone load-bearing capacity probably mirrors the huge amount and/or the spacial distribution of the newly formed bone into the defect site, the presence of the biomaterial particulate and the strong bond between them (5). Newly formed bone was observed surrounding Biosicate^® and Bioglass^® 45S5 particles in a direct contact with the material surface, in the study conducted by Granito et al (5). Moreover, interparticle spaces were also filled with new bone tissue, exhibiting trabeculae bridge formation between some particles, resulting in the glass particle incorporation within the bone structure. Both mineralized and osteoid volumes were increased by Biosilicate^®, as well as the number of osteoblasts surrounding bone tissue. Therefore, bioactive glasses have osteogenic properties and can be used as a graft to heal bone defects (27), mainly due to their ability to adapt to the defect shape, their potential to stimulate osteogenesis and their capacity to bond to bone.

Despite the stimulatory effects of LLLT and bioactive materials on bone repair, few reports have studied the association of these therapies. Gerbi et al (28) investigated the influence of LLLT (4 J/cm², 40 mW, every 48 hours for 15 days) on bone defects grafted with inorganic bovine material, and observed that the repair of the irradiated bone was characterized by an increase in bone formation and in the amount of collagen fibers around the graft. Positive biomodulatory effects may be reached by enhancing osteoblast adhesion and vessel migration toward the material surface. Bossini et al (29) showed that Biosilicate^® associated with laser therapy was efficient to enhance bone formation. Moreover, LLLT with either 60 or 120 J/cm² was able to increase collagen, Cbfa-1, VGEF and COX-2 expression in cells adjacent to Biosilicate^®. Therefore, laser therapy and Biosilicate^® could together improve the bone repair process by increasing bone formation, as well as COX-2 and Cbfa-1 immunoexpression, angiogenesis and collagen deposition in osteoporotic rats.

It is worth noting that the biomechanical analysis of osteopenic bone defects filled with particulate biomaterial and/or treated with LLLT was an efficient model. OVX is a reliable and widely used experimental model to induce osteopenia in rats, leading to a decrease of the bone mass and an increase of bone fragility (15, 16, 18, 19, 29). Noncritical bone defects were used to overcome the difficult of placing and retaining the biomaterial particles in the defect site. A cohesive mass was formed when Biosilicate^® particles were placed in the bleeding site. Consequently, the particles could easily pack into the bone defect site and stay in place. The same phenomenon was reported by Oonishi et al (30) using Bioglass^® 45S5 particles to fill noncritical bone defects in femoral condyles of rabbits. According to these authors, the cohesive mass is formed because rapid reactions on the material surface lead to the formation of a gel layer, and consequently, sufficient hemostasis is reached.

Finally, the 3-point bending test was used to determine the mechanical properties of the tibiae. This test revealed no significant difference for maximal load or energy of absorption among the groups, suggesting that the treatments with LLLT and Biosilicate^® elicit changes in bone callus, but no effects in bone structure; a finding which is corroborated by a study by Ke et al (31).

In summary, our findings show that although it is well-known that LLLT exerts an osteogenic activity during bone repair, this therapy was not effective in increasing biomechanical properties in the present study. Interestingly, Biosilicate^® and the association of Biosilicate^® and LLLT increased maximal load and energy indentation.

Laser therapy may represent one of the most promising treatment modalities to improve the positive effects of bioactive materials on bone regeneration. Further long-term studies should be developed to provide additional information concerning the late stages of the bone matrix synthesis and resorption induced by Biosilicate^® and laser therapy in osteopenic rats.

Footnotes

Financial support: This work was funded by the Brazilian funding agency Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – CAPES. CAPES is a foundation within the Ministry of Education (MEC).

Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

References

Bultink

I.E.

, Lems

W.F.

Osteoarthritis and osteoporosis: what is the overlap?

Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2013; 15(5): 328.

Adachi

J.D.

, Adami

, Gehlbach

; GLOW Investigators. Impact of prevalent fractures on quality of life: baseline results from the global longitudinal study of osteoporosis in women. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010; 85(9): 806–813.

Fazil

, Ali

, Baboota

, Sahni

J.K.

, Ali

Exploring drug delivery systems for treating osteoporosis. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013; 10(8): 1123–36.

Moura

, Teixeira

L.N.

, Ravagnani

In vitro osteogenesis on a highly bioactive glass-ceramic (Biosilicate). J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007; 82(3): 545–557.

Granito

R.N.

, Rennó

A.C.

, Ravagnani

In vivo biological performance of a novel highly bioactive glass-ceramic (Biosilicate^®): a biomechanical and histomorphometric study in rat tibial defects. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2011; 97(1): 139–147.

Liu

, Lyon

, Meier

H.T.

, Thometz

, Haworth

S.T.

Effect of lower-level laser therapy on rabbit tibial fracture. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007; 25(6): 487–494.

Barbos Pinheiro

A.L.

, Limeira Júnior

F.A.

, Márquez Gerbi

M.E.

Effect of 830-nm laser light on the repair of bone defects grafted with inorganic bovine bone and decalcified cortical osseous membrane. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2003; 21(6): 383–388.

Luger

E.J.

, Rochkind

, Wollman

, Kogan

, Dekel

Effect of low-power laser irradiation on the mechanical properties of bone fracture healing in rats. Lasers Surg Med. 1998; 22(2): 97–102.

Renno

A.C.M.

, McDonnell

P.A.

, Laakso

E.L.

Effect of 830 nm laser phototherapy on osteoblasts grown in vitro on Biosilicate scaffolds. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009; 12: 124–129.

10.

Renno

A.C.M.

, McDonnell

P.A.

, Parizotto

N.A.

, Laakso

E.L.

The effects of laser irradiation on osteoblast and osteosarcoma cell proliferation and differentiation in vitro. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007; 25(4): 275–280.

11.

Buravlev

E.A.

, Zhidkova

T.V.

, Vladimirov

Y.A.

, Osipov

A.N.

Effects of laser and LED radiation on mitochondrial respiration in experimental endotoxic shock. Lasers Med Sci. 2013; 28(3): 785–90.

12.

Ozawa

, Shimizu

, Kariya

, Abiko

Low-energy laser irradiation stimulates bone nodule formation at early stages of cell culture in rat calvarial cells. Bone. 1998; 22(4): 347–354.

13.

Stein

, Benayahu

, Maltz

, Oron

Low-level laser irradiation promotes proliferation and differentiation of human osteoblasts in vitro. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005; 23(2): 161–166.

14.

Matsumoto

M.A.

, Ferino

R.V.

, Monteleone

G.F.

, Ribeiro

D.A.

Low-level laser therapy modulates cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression during bone repair in rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2009; 24(2): 195–201.

15.

Renno

A.C.

, de Moura

F.M.

, dos Santos

N.S.

, Tirico

R.P.

, Bossini

P.S.

, Parizotto

N.A.

Effects of 830-nm laser, used in two doses, on biomechanical properties of osteopenic rat femora. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006; 24(2): 202–206.

16.

Muniz Renno

A.C.

, de Moura

F.M.

, dos Santos

N.S.

, Tirico

R.P.

, Bossini

P.S.

, Parizotto

N.A.

The effects of infrared-830 nm laser on exercised osteopenic rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2006; 21(4): 202–207.

17.

Diniz

J.S.

, Nicolau

R.A.

, de Melo Ocarino

, do Carmo Magalhães

, de Oliveira Pereira

R.D.

, Serakides

Effect of low-power gallium-aluminum-arsenium laser therapy (830 nm) in combination with bisphosphonate treatment on osteopenic bone structure: an experimental animal study. Lasers Med Sci. 2009; 24(3): 347–352.

18.

Comelekoglu

, Bagis

, Yalin

Biomechanical evaluation in osteoporosis: ovariectomized rat model. Clin Rheumatol. 2007; 26(3): 380–384.

19.

Kalu

D.N.

The ovariectomized rat model of postmenopausal bone loss. Bone Miner. 1991; 15(3): 175–191.

20.

Granito

R.N.

, Ribeiro

D.A.

, Rennó

A.C.

Effects of biosilicate and bioglass 45S5 on tibial bone consolidation on rats: a biomechanical and a histological study. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009; 20(12): 2521–2526.

21.

Tim

C.R.

, Pinto

K.N.

, Rossi

B.R.

Low-level laser therapy enhances the expression of osteogenic factors during bone repair in rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2014; 29(1): 147–56.

22.

Pinheiro

A.L.

, Santos

N.R.

, Oliveira

P.C.

The efficacy of the use of IR laser phototherapy associated to biphasic ceramic graft and guided bone regeneration on surgical fractures treated with wire osteosynthesis: a comparative laser fluorescence and Raman spectral study on rabbits. Lasers Med Sci. 2013; 28(3): 815–22.

23.

Fangel

, Bossini

P.S.

, Renno

A.C.

Low-level laser therapy, at 60 J/cm² associated with a Biosilicate(^®) increase in bone deposition and indentation biomechanical properties of callus in osteopenic rats. J Biomed Opt. 2011; 16(7): 078001.

24.

Kamali

, Bayat

, Torkaman

, Ebrahimi

, Salavati

The therapeutic effect of low-level laser on repair of osteochondral defects in rabbit knee. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2007; 88(1): 11–15.

25.

Lirani-Galvão

A.P.

, Jorgetti

, da Silva

O.L.

Comparative study of how low-level laser therapy and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound affect bone repair in rats. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006; 24(6): 735–740.

26.

Pretel

, Lizarelli

R.F.

, Ramalho

L.T.

Effect of low-level laser therapy on bone repair: histological study in rats. Lasers Surg Med. 2007; 39(10): 788–796.

27.

Calixto

R.F.

, Teófilo

J.M.

, Brentegani

L.G.

, Lamano-Carvalho

T.L.

Grafting of tooth extraction socket with inorganic bovine bone or bioactive glass particles: comparative histometric study in rats. Implant Dent. 2007; 16(3): 260–269.

28.

Gerbi

M.E.

, Pinheiro

A.L.B.

, Marzola

Assessment of bone repair associated with the use of organic bovine bone and membrane irradiated at 830 nm. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005; 23(4): 382–388.

29.

Bossini

P.S.

, Rennó

A.C.

, Ribeiro

D.A.

Biosilicate^® and low-level laser therapy improve bone repair in osteoporotic rats. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2011; 5(3): 229–237.

30.

Oonishi

, Kushitani

, Yasukawa

Particulate bioglass compared with hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997; (334) 316–25.

31.

H.Z.

, Shen

V.W.

, Qi

Prostaglandin E2 increases bone strength in intact rats and in ovariectomized rats with established osteopenia. Bone. 1998; 23(3): 249–255.

Biomechanical Properties: Effects of Low-level Laser Therapy and Biosilicate ® on Tibial Bone Defects in Osteopenic Rats

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Biomaterial

Surgical procedures

Low-level laser therapy

Biomechanical test

Statistical analysis

Results

Discussion

Footnotes

References