This study investigates the outcomes of cemented sockets in young patients (<50 years) requiring a total hip replacement (THR) compared to older patients (>50 years) having the same procedure, under the same surgeon between June 2005 and May 2009.
Methods
Prosthesis survivorship rates, patient outcomes and radiological findings were compared between a consecutive series of 56 young patients (mean 42, range 25-49) and 56 older patients (mean 69, range 53-81) that underwent a primary THR using a cemented Stryker® Exeter™ Contemporary™ flanged cup. The minimum follow-up was 5 years.
Results
No significant difference was observed between the groups’ Oxford Hip Scores (p = 0.078) or satisfaction scores (p = 0.67). Worst case scenario analysis for revision, failure or lost to follow-up showed 94.6% survival in the <50 year olds and 92.9% survival in the >50 year olds at 5 years. This study demonstrates no significant difference in patient outcomes, survivorship or radiographic findings at a minimum of 5 years between patients <50 years old and those >50 years old undergoing THR with a cemented socket.
Conclusions
We believe the current trend towards uncemented cups may be driven by marketing rather than by evidence of improved outcomes. Cemented sockets provide very good outcomes for patients of all ages.
National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR England-Wales).Tenth annual report 2013.www.njrcentre.org.uk. Accessed April 25, 2015.
2.
De KamD.C., BuschV.J., VethR.P., SchreursB.W.Total hip arthroplasties in young patients under 50 years: limited evidence for current trends. A descriptive literature review.Hip Int.2011; 21(5): 518–525.
3.
MäkeläK.T., MatilainenM., PulkkinenP.. Failure rate of cemented and uncemented total hip replacements: register study of combined Nordic database of four nations.BMJ.2014; 348(jan 13 12): f7592.
4.
DawsonJ., FitzpatrickR., CarrA., MurrayD.Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement.J Bone Joint Surg Br.1996; 78(2): 185–190.
5.
MarshJ., BryantD., MacDonaldS.J.Older patients can accurately recall their preoperative health status six weeks following total hip arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2009; 91(12): 2827–2837.
6.
ClementN.D., JenkinsP.J., MacDonaldD.. Socioeconomic status affects the Oxford knee score and short-form 12 score following total knee replacement.Bone Joint J.2013; 95-B(1): 52–58.
7.
EspehaugB., HavelinL.I., EngesaeterL.B., LangelandN., VollsetS.E.Patient satisfaction and function after primary and revision total hip replacement.Clin Orthop Relat Res.1998; (351): 135–148.
8.
DeLeeJ.G., CharnleyJ.Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.Clin Orthop Relat Res.1976; (121): 20–32.
9.
CallaghanJ.J., ForestE.E., OlejniczakJ.P., GoetzD.D., JohnstonR.C.Charnley total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. A twenty to twenty-five-year follow-up note.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1998; 80(5): 704–714.
10.
MurrayD.W., FitzpatrickR., RogersK.. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.Bone Joint Res.2015; 4(8): 137–144.
11.
LandisJ.R., KochG.G.The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics.1977; 33(1): 159–174.
12.
VeitchS.W., WhitehouseS.L., HowellJ.R., HubbleM.J., GieG.A., TimperleyA.J.The concentric all-polyethylene Exeter acetabular component in primary total hip replacement.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2010; 92(10): 1351–1355.
13.
JenkinsP.J., ClementN.D., HamiltonD.F., GastonP., PattonJ.T., HowieC.R.Predicting the cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacement: a health economic analysis.Bone Joint J.2013; 95-B(1): 115–121.
14.
MalchauH., HerbertsP., EislerT., GarellickG., SödermanP.The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2002; 84-A(Suppl 2): 2–20.
15.
HavelinL.I., EngesaeterL.B., EspehaugB., FurnesO., LieS.A., VollsetS.E.The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties.Acta Orthop Scand.2000; 71(4): 337–353.
16.
PuolakkaT.J., PajamäkiK.J., HalonenP.J., PulkkinenP.O., PaavolainenP., NevalainenJ.K.The Finnish Arthroplasty Register: report of the hip register.Acta Orthop Scand.2001; 72(5): 433–441.
17.
MäkeläK., EskelinenA., PulkkinenP., PaavolainenP., RemesV.Cemented total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis in patients aged 55 years or older: results of the 12 most common cemented implants followed for 25 years in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2008; 90(12): 1562–1569.
18.
BallardW.T., CallaghanJ.J., SullivanP.M., JohnstonR.C.The results of improved cementing techniques for total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. A ten-year follow-up study.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1994; 76(7): 959–964.
19.
BoereeN.R., BannisterG.C.Cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years of age. Ten- to 18-year results.Clin Orthop Relat Res.1993; (287): 153–159.
20.
CollisD.K.Long-term (twelve to eighteen-year) follow-up of cemented total hip replacements in patients who were less than fifty years old. A follow-up note.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1991; 73(4): 593–597.
21.
DevittA., O'SullivanT., QuinlanW.16- to 25-year follow-up study of cemented arthroplasty of the hip in patients aged 50 years or younger.J Arthroplasty.1997; 12(5): 479–489.
22.
OlderJ., KaneTJIII, ConatyJ.P.Charnley low-friction arthroplasty: a worldwide retrospective review at 15 to 20 years.J Arthroplasty.2002; 17(6): 675–680.
23.
BerryD.J., HarmsenW.S., CabanelaM.E., MorreyB.F.Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2002; 84-A(2): 171–177.
24.
SullivanP.M., MacKenzieJ.R., CallaghanJ.J., JohnstonR.C.Total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients who are less than fifty years old. A sixteen to twenty-two-year follow-up study.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1994; 76(6): 863–869.
25.
CapelloW.N., D'AntonioJ.A., FeinbergJ.R., ManleyM.T.Ten-year results with hydroxyapatite-coated total hip femoral components in patients less than fifty years old. A concise follow-up of a previous report.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2003; 85-A(5): 885–889.
26.
DuffyG.P., BerryD.J., RowlandC., CabanelaM.E.Primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients <40 years old: 10- to 14-year results using first-generation proximally porous-coated implants.J Arthroplasty.2001; 16(8)(Suppl 1): 140–144.
27.
McLaughlinJ.R., LeeK.R.Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component in patients younger than 50 years.J Arthroplasty.2011; 26(1): 9–15.
28.
KimY.H., KimJ.S., ParkJ.W., JooJ.H.Comparison of total hip replacement with and without cement in patients younger than 50 years of age: the results at 18 years.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2011; 93(4): 449–455.
29.
HowardJ.L., KremersH.M., LoechlerY.A.. Comparative survival of uncemented acetabular components following primary total hip arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2011; 93(17): 1597–1604.
30.
HallanG., DybvikE., FurnesO., HavelinL.I.Metal-backed acetabular components with conventional polyethylene: a review of 9113 primary components with a follow-up of 20 years.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2010; 92(2): 196–201.
31.
StreitM.R., WeissS., AndreasF.. 10-year results of the uncemented Allofit press-fit cup in young patients.Acta Orthop.2014; 85(4): 368–374.
32.
TakenagaR.K., CallaghanJ.J., BedardN.A., LiuS.S., KlaassenA.L., PedersenD.R.Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age or younger: a minimum ten-year follow-up.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2012; 94(23): 2153–2159.
33.
Australian Orthopaedic Association.National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual report 2012. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/. Accessed May 16, 2015.
34.
SchmalzriedT.P., ShepherdE.F., DoreyF.J.. The John Charnley Award. Wear is a function of use, not time.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2000; (381): 36–46.
35.
SchmalzriedT.P., SzuszczewiczE.S., NorthfieldM.R.. Quantitative assessment of walking activity after total hip or knee replacement.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1998; 80(1): 54–59.
KobayashiS., EftekharN.S., TerayamaK., JoshiR.P.Comparative study of total hip arthroplasty between younger and older patients.Clin Orthop Relat Res.1997; 339: 140–151.
38.
LewthwaiteS.C., SquiresB., GieG.A., TimperleyA.J., LingR.S.The Exeter Universal hip in patients 50 years or younger at 10-17 years’ followup.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2008; 466(2): 324–331.
39.
BizotP., HannoucheD., NizardR., WitvoetJ., SedelL.Hybrid alumina total hip arthroplasty using a press-fit metal-backed socket in patients younger than 55 years. A six- to 11-year evaluation.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2004; 86(2): 190–194.
40.
ChmellM.J., ScottR.D., ThomasW.H., SledgeC.B.Total hip arthroplasty with cement for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Results at a minimum of ten years in patients less than thirty years old.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1997; 79(1): 44–52.
41.
JoshiA.B., PorterM.L., TrailI.A., HuntL.P., MurphyJ.C., HardingeK.Long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients.J Bone Joint Surg Br.1993; 75(4): 616–623.
42.
KerboullL., HamadoucheM., CourpiedJ.P., KerboullM.Long-term results of Charnley-Kerboull hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2004; 418: 112–118.
43.
LiP.L., IngleP.J., DowellJ.K.Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty; should it be done?J Bone Joint Surg Br.1996; 78(5): 809–811.
44.
ZweymüllerK.A cementless titanium hip endoprosthesis system based on press-fit fixation: basic research and clinical results.Instr Course Lect.1986; 35: 203–225.
45.
NayakN.K., MullikenB., RorabeckC.H., BourneR.B., RobinsonE.J.Osteolysis in cemented versus cementless acetabular components.J Arthroplasty.1996; 11(2): 135–140.
46.
HailerN.P., GarellickG., KärrholmJ.Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.Acta Orthop.2010; 81(1): 34–41.
47.
SchulteK.R., CallaghanJ.J., KelleyS.S., JohnstonR.C.The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up. The results of one surgeon.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1993; 75(7): 961–975.
48.
LearmonthI.D., hussellJ.G., GroblerG.P.Unpredictable progression of osteolysis following cementless hip arthroplasty. 24 femoral components followed for 6-10 years.Acta Orthop Scand.1996; 67(3): 245–248.
49.
MaloneyW.J., HerzwurmP., PaproskyW., RubashH.E., EnghC.A.Treatment of pelvic osteolysis associated with a stable acetabular component inserted without cement as part of a total hip replacement.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1997; 79(11): 1628–1634.
MaloneyW.J., PetersP., EnghC.A., ChandlerH.Severe osteolysis of the pelvic in association with acetabular replacement without cement.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1993; 75(11): 1627–1635.
