This study investigates the adoption of technology in smart tourist destinations, with a focus on the Baby Boomer generation. The objective is to analyze the perceived utility, intention to use, and risk perception of this generation regarding Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the context of smart tourist destinations. Data were collected through questionnaires administered to elderly groups belonging to the Baby Boomer generation in two Brazilian cities. Data analysis was conducted using statistical tools such as SPSS and Microsoft Excel, with an emphasis on regression analysis with moderation. The results indicate that when Baby Boomer tourists feel insecure about technology, they tend to not perceive its utility, impacting its acceptance. On the other hand, lower risk perceptions lead to an increase in perceived utility and, consequently, a greater intention to use technology in travel planning. The moderating role of risk perception in the relationship between perceived utility and intention to use is emphasized. The findings highlight the need for managers of smart destinations to consider the risks perceived by tourists, focus on diverse age groups, and implement strategies that address digital exclusion.
AcharyaS., & MekkerM. (2022). Public acceptance of connected vehicles: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 88, 54–68.
2.
ArfiW. B.NasrI. B.KhvatovaT., & ZaiedY. B. (2021). Understanding acceptance of eHealthcare by IoT natives and IoT immigrants: An integrated model of UTAUT, perceived risk, and financial cost. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120437.
3.
AtkinsK. G., & HyunS. Y. J. (2016). Smart shoppers’ purchasing experiences: Functions of product type, gender, and generation. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 8(2), 1.
4.
BadowskaS.ZamojskaA., & RogalaA. (2015). Baby boomers’ attitudes toward innovations: Empirical research in Poland. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 1050–1056.
5.
BanduraA. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122.
6.
BaumanM. J.VelikovaN.DoddT., & BlankenshipT. (2020). Generational differences in risk perception and situational uses of wine information sources. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 32(2), 247–265.
7.
BeachL. R., & MitchellT. R. (1978). A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 439–449.
8.
BernsteinP. (2001). Admen bank on boomers. Variety, February 5, 29–36.
9.
BerselliC.PereiraL. A.PereiraT., & LimbergerP. F. (2022). Overtourism: Residents’ perceived impacts of tourism saturation. Tourism Analysis, 27(2), 161–172.
10.
BhattacherjeeA. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.
11.
BranscombL. M., & ThomasJ. C. (1984). Ease of use: A system design challenge. IBM Systems Journal, 23(3), 224–235.
12.
BratmanM. (1987). Intention, plans, and practical reason.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
CapdevilaI., & ZarlengaM. I. (2015). Smart city or smart citizens? The Barcelona case. Journal of Strategy and Management, 8(3), 266–282.
14.
CardS. K.MoranT. P., & NewellA. (2018). The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction.Boca Raton: CRC Press.
15.
ChamosoP.González-BrionesA.RodríguezS., & CorchadoJ. M. (2018). Tendencies of technologies and platforms in smart cities: a state-of-the-art review. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2018, 3086854.
16.
ChaneyD.TouzaniM., & Ben Slimane, K. (2017). Marketing to the (new) generations: Summary and perspectives. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25(3), 179–189.
17.
ChenR., & HeF. (2003). Examination of brand knowledge, perceived risk and consumers’ intention to adopt an online retailer. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 14(6), 677–693.
18.
ChongA. Y.ChanF. T. S., & OoiK. B. (2012). Predicting consumer decisions to adopt mobile commerce: Cross country empirical examination between China and Malaysia. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 34–43.
19.
CledouG.EstevezE., & BarbosaL. S. (2018). A taxonomy for planning and designing smart mobility services. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 61–76.
20.
DavisF. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
21.
DeloneW. H., & McLeanE. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.
22.
DirsehanT., & van Zoonen, L. (2022). Smart city technologies from the perspective of technology acceptance. IET Smart Cities, 4(3), 197–210.
23.
DokaK. J. (1992). When gray is golden: Business in an ageing America. The Futuristy 26(4), 16–21.
24.
FeathermanM.JiaS. J.CaliffC. B., & HajliN. (2021). The impact of new technologies on consumers’ beliefs: Reducing the perceived risks of electric vehicle adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120847.
25.
Femenia-SerraF.Perles-RibesJ. F., & Ivars-BaidalJ. A. (2019). Smart destinations and tech-savvy millennial tourists: Hype versus reality. Tourism Review, 74(1), 63–81.
26.
GabrielovaK., & BuchkoA. A. (2021). Here comes Generation Z: Millennials as managers. Business Horizons, 64(4), 489–499.
27.
GetzI., & WeissmanG. (2010). An information needs profile of Israeli older adults, regarding the law and services. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 42(2), 136–146.
28.
GouldJ. D., & LewisC. (1985). Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28(3), 300–311.
29.
GretzelU.ZhongL., & KooC. (2016). Application of smart tourism to cities. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 2(2).
30.
GuerrieriP., & BentivegnaS. (2011). The economic impact of digital technologies: Measuring inclusion and diffusion in Europe.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
31.
HayesA. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach.New York: Guilford Press.
InceE. B.ChaK., & ChoJ. (2023). An investigation into generation Z's mindsets of entertainment in an autonomous vehicle. Entertainment Computing, 46, 100550.
34.
Ivars-BaidalJ. A.Celdrán-BernabeuM. A.MazónJ. N., & Perles-Ivars, Á. F. (2019). Smart destinations and the evolution of ICTs: A new scenario for destination management? Current Issues in Tourism, 22(13), 1581–1600.
35.
JovicicD. Z. (2019). From the traditional understanding of tourism destination to the smart tourism destination. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(3), 276–282.
36.
JurkiewiczC. L., & BrownR. G. (1998). Generational comparisons of public employee motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 18(4), 18–37.
37.
KellerS. L., & LeslieP. (2017). Aging in place: Baby boomers and what we can learn from Japan. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 2(15), 53–59.
38.
KomninosN. (2013). Intelligent cities: innovation, knowledge systems and digital spaces.London: Routledge.
39.
KupperschmidtB. R. (2000). Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management. The Health Care Manager, 19(1), 65–76.
40.
LeeC.RahafroozM., & LeeO. K. D. (2017). What are the concerns of using a ride-sharing service? An investigation of Uber. Concerns in Ride-Share Use: Twenty-third Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston, 1–5.
41.
LehtoX. Y.JangS.AchanaF. T., & O'LearyJ. T. (2008). Exploring tourism experience sought: A cohort comparison of baby boomers and the silent generation. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 14(3), 237–252.
42.
LiW.LongR.ChenH., & GengJ. (2017). Household factors and adopting intention of battery electric vehicles: A multi-group structural equation model analysis among consumers in Jiangsu Province, China. Natural Hazards, 87(2), 945–960.
43.
LiW.LongR.ChenH., & GengJ. (2017). Household factors and adopting intention of battery electric vehicles: A multi-group structural equation model analysis among consumers in Jiangsu Province, China. Natural Hazards, 87(2), 945–960.
44.
LimJ. S., & ZhangJ. (2022). Adoption of AI-driven personalization in digital news platforms: An integrative model of technology acceptance and perceived contingency. Technology in Society, 69, 101965.
45.
LissitsaS., & LaorT. (2021). Baby Boomers, Generation X and Generation Y: Identifying generational differences in effects of personality traits in on-demand radio use. Technology in Society, 64, 101526.
46.
LissitsaS.ZychlinskiE., & KaganM. (2022). The Silent Generation vs Baby Boomers: Socio-demographic and psychological predictors of the “gray” digital inequalities. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107098.
47.
LutzS.SchneiderF. M., & VordererP. (2020). On the downside of mobile communication: An experimental study about the influence of setting-inconsistent pressure on employees’ emotional well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106216.
48.
LyonsS. T.DuxburyL., & HigginsC. (2007). An empirical assessment of generational differences in basic human values. Psychological Reports, 101(2), 339–352.
49.
McGillT.HobbsV., & KlobasJ. (2003). User-developed applications and information systems success: A test of DeLone and McLean's model. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 16(1), 24–45.
50.
MohantyS. P.ChoppaliU., & KoungianosE. (2016). Everything you wanted to know about smart cities: The internet of things is the backbone. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 5(3), 60–70.
51.
PereiraT., & Gadotti dos Anjos, S. J. (2022). Corporate social responsibility as a resource for tourism development support. Tourism Planning & Development, 1–24.
52.
PereiraT.BerselliC.PereiraL., & LimbergerP. (2022). Overtourism: An analysis of demographic and socioeconomic factors with the evasion indicators of residents in Brazilian coastal destinations. Tourism Planning & Development, 1–21.
53.
PereiraT.LimbergerP. F., & ArdigóC. M. (2021). The moderating effect of the need for interaction with a service employee on purchase intention in chatbots. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 1, 100003.
54.
PetterS., & McLeanE. R. (2009). A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. Information & Management, 46(3), 159–166.
55.
PiroG.CianciI.GriecoL. A.BoggiaG., & CamardaP. (2014). Information centric services in smart cities. Journal of Systems and Software, 88, 169–188.
56.
RogersE. M., & ShoemakerF. F. (1971). Communication of innovations; A cross-cultural approach.New York: The Free Press.
57.
RosenL. (2011). Teaching the iGeneration. Education Leadership, 68(5), 10–15.
58.
SongJ.KimJ., & ChoK. (2018). Understanding users’ continuance intentions to use smart-connected sports products. Sport Management Review, 21(5), 477–490.
59.
SorokinaE.WangY.FyallA.LugosiP.TorresE., & JungT. (2022). Constructing a smart destination framework: A destination marketing organization perspective. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 23, 100688.
60.
SteinfeldN., & LaorT. (2019). New arenas or more of the same? Public and commercial radio stations on Facebook. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 26(2), 194–209.
61.
StewartA. J., & TorgesC. M. (2014). Social, historical, and developmental influences on the psychology of the baby boom at midlife. In: The Baby Boomers Grow Up (pp. 33–54). London: Psychology Press.
62.
TruongY. (2013). A cross-country study of consumer innovativeness and technological service innovation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20, 130–137
63.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellS. M.HoffmanB. J., & LanceC. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117–1142.
64.
ValkeneersG., & VanhoomissenT. (2012). Generations living their own life: The differences in lifestyle and consumer behaviour between busters and baby boomers. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 11(1), 53–68.
65.
VanoloA. (2014). Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies, 51(5), 883–898.
66.
VenkateshV.MorrisM. G.DavisG. B., & DavisF. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425–478.
67.
VenkateshV.ThongJ. Y., & XuX. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 157–178.
68.
VertinskyI.BarthR. T., & MitchellV. F. (1975). A study of OR/MS implementation as a social change process. *Implementing Operations Research/Management Science, 253–272.
69.
WangN.TianaH.ZhuS., & LiY. (2022). Analysis of public acceptance of electric vehicle charging scheduling based on the technology acceptance model. Energy, 258, 124804.
70.
WangS.WangJ.LiJ.WangJ., & LiangL. (2018). Policy implications for promoting the adoption of electric vehicles: Do consumer's knowledge, perceived risk, and financial incentive policy matter? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117, 58–69.
71.
WangY. S.LinH. H., & LuarnP. (2006). Predicting consumer intention to use mobile service. Information Systems Journal, 16(2), 157–179.
72.
WangY.GencE., & PengG. (2020). Aiming the mobile targets in a cross-cultural context: Effects of trust, privacy concerns, and attitude. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(3), 227–238.
73.
WangY.WangS.WangJ.WeiJ., & WangC. (2020). An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: Using an extended technology acceptance model. Transportation, 47(1), 397–415.
74.
WongM.GardinerE.LangW., & CoulonL. (2008). Generational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 878–890.
75.
WuJ. H., & WangS. C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(5), 719–729.
76.
WuY. C.SunR., & WuY. J. (2020). Smart city development in Taiwan: From the perspective of the information security policy. Sustainability, 12(7), 2916.
77.
YangK. C., & ShihP. H. (2020). Cognitive age in technology acceptance: At what age are people ready to adopt and continuously use fashionable products? Telematics and Informatics, 51, 101400.
78.
YuC.YeB.LinC., & WuY. J. (2020). Can smart city development promote residents’ emotional well-being? Evidence From China. IEEE Access, 8, 116024–116040.
