ATKINSONP.
(1988) ‘Ethnomethodology: A Critical
Review’.Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 14, pp.
441–465.
2.
BOURDIEUP.
(1998) Practical Reason: On the Theory of
Action.Cambridge:
Polity.
3.
BOURDIEUP.
(2000) Pascalian Meditations.Translated by Nice, R. Cambridge:
Polity.
4.
COULTERJ.
(1979) The Social Construction of Mind: Studies in
Ethnomethodology and Linguistic Philosophy.London:
Macmillan.
5.
GARFINKELH.,
and SACKSH.
(1986) ‘On Formal Structures of Practical
Actions’. In
GarfinkelH.
(editor) Ethnomethodological Studies of Work.London: Routledge and Kegan
Paul.
6.
LEMERTC.
(1979) ‘De-Centred Analysis: Ethnomethodology
and Structuralism’,Theory and Society, vol. 7. pp.
289–306.
7.
MAYT.
(1996) Situating Social Theory.Buckingham: Open University
Press.
8.
MAYT.
(1998a) “Reflexivity in the Age of
Reconstructive Social Science’, International
Journal of Methodology: Theory and Practice, vol 1
(1), pp. 7–24.
9.
MAYT., (1998b)
‘Reflections and Reflexivity’. In May, T. and
Williams, M. (editors) Knowing the Social World. Buckingham:
Open University Press.
10.
MAYT., (1999)
‘Reflexivity and Sociological Practice’,
Sociological Research Online, Special Section on ‘The Future of
Sociology’, vol 4, no. 3, <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/3/may.html>.
11.
MAYT.
(2000) ‘The Future of Critique: Positioning,
Belonging and Reflexivity’,European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 3, no.
2, pp.
157–173.
12.
MAYT.
(forthcoming) Sociology, Reflexivity and Social Life.London:
Sage
13.
McHOULA.‘Towards a Critical Ethnomethodology’,Theory, Culture and Society, vol 11, no.
4, pp.
105–126.
14.
MILLERG.
(1997) ‘Building Bridges: The Possibility of
Analytic Dialogue Between Ethnography, Conversation Analysis and
Foucault’. In
SilvermanD.
(editor) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice.London:
Sage.
15.
POLLNERM.
(1991) ‘Left of Ethnomethodology: The Rise and
Decline of Radical Reflexivity’,American Sociological Review, vol. 56, no.
3, pp.
370–380.
16.
ROGERSM.F.
(1983) Sociology, Ethnomethodology, and Experience: A
Phenomenological Critique.Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
17.
ROGERSM.F.
(1984) ‘Everyday Life as Text’.
In CollinsR. (editor)
Sociological Theory.San Francisco: Josey
Bass.
