The introduction of the social model of disability has attempted to move the spotlight of research away from the medical model theories of disability toward an investigation of the impacts of societal perceptions of disability upon people with disabilities. This article attempts to look at the impacts of societal perceptions of disability and disability sport, which in the main remain grounded in the medical model approach, upon people with disabilities in their attempts to become involved in and progress in their chosen sport. It also looks at the propensity for media coverage to recreate and reinforce many of the perceptions of disability present within the medical model approach to disability.
Addelson, K. P.
(1983). The man of professional wisdom. In S. Harding & M. B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality (pp. 165-186). Boston: Reidel.
2.
Barnes, C.
(1994). Disabled people in Britain and discrimination (2nd ed.). London: Hurst.
3.
Barton, L.
(1993). Disability, empowerment and physical education. In J. Evans (Ed.), Equality, education and physical education (pp. 43-54). London: Falmer.
4.
British Olympic Association Athletes Commission
. (1996a). Survey questionnaire of athletes returning from Atlanta. London: Author.
5.
British Olympic Association Athletes Commission
. (1996b). Survey report. London: Author.
6.
British Olympic Association Athletes Commission
. (1998). Survey questionnaire of athletes returning from Nagano. London: Author.
7.
British Olympic Association Athletes Commission
. (2000a). Post-Olympic Games athlete survey questions Sydney 2000. London: Author.
8.
British Olympic Association Athletes Commission
. (2000b). Survey report. London: Author.
9.
Brittain, I. S. (2002). Perspectives of elite athletes with disabilities: Problems and possibilities. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, High Wycombe, UK.
Cumberbatch, G.
, & Negrine, R. (1992) Images of disability on television. London: Routledge.
12.
Davis, J. M.
(2000). Disability studies as ethnographic research and text: Research strategies and roles for prompting social change?Disability and Society, 15(2), 191-206.
13.
Devine, M. A.
(1997). Inclusive leisure services and research: A consideration of the use of social construction theory. Journal of Leisurability, 24(2), 3-11.
14.
Donnellan, C.
(Ed.). (1998). Issues: Disbilities, 17. Cambridge, UK: Independence.
15.
Drake, R. F.
(1996). Charities, authority and disabled people: A qualitative study. Disability and Society, 11, 5-23.
16.
Drake, R. F.
(1999) Understanding disability politics. London: MacMillan.
17.
Eden, R.
(2000, November 12). Apology over award gaffe for disabled. The Daily Telegraph, p.9.
18.
Felske, A. W.
(1994). Knowing about knowing: Margin notes on disability research. In M.H. Rioux & M. Bach (Eds.), Disability is not measles: New research paradigms in disability (pp. 181-199). Ontario, Canada: Roeher Institute.
19.
Finkelstein, V.
(1980) Attitudes and disabled people: Issues for discussion, monograph 5. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.
20.
Gramsci, A.
(1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Greengross & G. Nowell Smith, Eds.). London: Lawrence & Wishart.
21.
Haralambos, M.
, & Holborn, M. (2000). Sociology: Themes and perspectives (5th ed.). London: Collins.
22.
Hargreaves, J.
(2000). Heroines of sport: The politics of difference and identity. London: Routledge.
23.
Haywood, L.
(1995). Understanding leisure (2nd ed.). Cheltenham, UK: Stanley Thomas.
24.
Henderson, K. A.
, & Bedini, L. A. (1997). Women, leisure, and “double whammies:” Empowerment and constraint. Journal of Leisurability, 24(1), 36-46.
25.
Hogan, A.
(1999). Carving out a space to act: Acquired impairment and contested identity. In M. Corker & S. French (Eds.), Disability discourse (pp. 79-91). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
26.
Hunt, P.
(Ed.). (1966). Stigma: The experience of disability. London: Chapman.
27.
Imrie, R.
(1997). Rethinking the relationships between disability, rehabilitation, and society. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19(7), 263-271.
28.
Jary, D.
, & Jary, J. (1999). Dictionary of sociology (2nd ed.). Glasgow, UK: Unwin Hyman.
29.
Kew, F.
(1997). Sport: Social problems and issues. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann.
30.
Lukes, S.
(1974). Power: A radical view. London: MacMillan.
31.
Mastro, J. V.
, Hall, M. M., & Canabal, M. Y. (1988). Cultural and attitudinal similarities—females and disabled individuals in sports and athletics. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 59(9), 80-83.
32.
Middleton, L.
(1999). Disabled children: Challenging social exclusion. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
33.
Morris, J.
(1991). Pride against prejudice: Transforming attitudes to disability. London: Women’s Free Press.
34.
Morris, J.
(Ed.).(1996). Introduction. In Encounters with strangers: Feminism and disability (pp. 1-12). London: Women’s Free Press.
35.
Neale, C.
(2000). Sports Talk—Have the Sydney Paralympics been a success? (section 6). Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport/hi/english/sports_talk/newsid_988000/988174.stm
36.
O’Donnell, M.
(1997). Introduction to sociology (4th ed.). Walton on Thames, UK: Thomas Nelson & Sons.
37.
Priestley, M.
(1998). Constructions and creations: Idealism, materialism and disability theory. Disability and Society, 13(1), 75-94.
38.
Reiser, R.
, & Mason, M. (1990). Disability equality in the classroom: A human rights issue. London: Inner London Education Authority.
39.
Schantz, O. J.
, & Gilbert, K. (2001). An ideal misconstrued: Newspaper coverage of the Atlanta Paralympic Games in France and Germany. Sociology of Sport Journal, 18, 69-94.
40.
Seymour, W.
(1989). Body alterations. London: Unwin Hyman.
41.
Sherrill, C.
(Ed.). (1986). Social and psychological dimensions of sports for disabled athletes. In Sport and disabled athletes (pp. 21-33). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
42.
Sport England
. (2001). Disability survey 2000: Young people with a disability and sport—headline findings. London: Author.
43.
Stone, E.
, & Priestley, M. (1996). Parasites, pawns and partners: Disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers. British Journal of Sociology, 47(4), 699-716.
44.
Thierfeld, J.
, & Gibbons, G. (1986). From access to equity: Opening doors for women athletes. Sports n Spokes, May/June, 21-23.
45.
Tiemann, H.
(1999). Exploring the sporting lives of women with a physical disability. In G. Doll-Tepper, M. Kroener, & W. Sonnenschein (Eds.), New horizons in sport for athletes with a disability: Proceedings of the International Vista ‘99 Conference (vol. 2) (pp. 643-654). Oxford, UK: Meyer & Meyer Sport.
46.
Tinning, R.
(1992). Action research as epistemology and practice. In A. C. Sparkes (Ed.), Research in physical education and sport: Exploring alternative visions (pp. 188-211). London: Falmer Press.
47.
Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation
. (1976). Fundamental principles of disability. London: Author.
48.
Wendell, S.
(1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. London: Routledge.
