This paper argues for an opening up of the theoretical and empirical closure on
issues related to biotechnology. It argues that the real differences between
issues and approaches in the disparate areas where genetic modification is used,
from medicine to food production, have tended, for specific reasons, to be
treated as though they could all be subsumed within a common set of issues and
theoretical perspectives. Using examples from the existing sociological work in
medicine and food, the paper presents an argument against the commonly assumed
theoreticýprimacy of scientific discourses, often focussed on common issues of
risk, and the related assumption thatýresistance to the introduction of gm
products is best addressed by providing information and education. It argues
rather that we need to treat each area as a very particularýresearch topic, and
to maintain a clearýnotion of the variety of perspectives needingýto be employed
in treating quite distinct applications of these varied technologies.
ANON
(1994). Labelling of Food Plant Biotechnology
Products, CAST(Council for Agricultural Science and
Technology).
2.
BAUMANZ.,
(1992) ‘The Solution as
Problem’,Times HigherEducational Supplement,
25,13/11/92.
3.
BAUMANZ.
(1997). Postmodernity and its Discontents.London,
Sage.
4.
BAUMANZ.
(1998). Work, Consumerism and the New Poor.Ballmoor, Open University
Press.
5.
BEARDSWORTHA.1990. ‘Trans science and Moral Panics; Understanding
Food Scares’. British Food Journal92: 11–16.
6.
BECKU.
(1992a) ‘From Industrial Society to the Risk
Society; Questions of Survival, Social Structure and Ecological
Enlightenment’Theory Culture and Society, 9,
97–123
7.
BECKU.
(1992b) The Risk SocietySage,
London.
8.
BECKU.1996. ‘World Risk Society as cosmopolitan society?
Ecological questions in a framework of manufactured
uncertainties’.Theory, Culture and Society13: 1–32
9.
BESTJ.
(1995) Images of Issues.New York: Aldine de
Gruyter
10.
BOHOLMA.
(1996). ‘Risk Perception and Cultural
Anthropology.’Ethnos61(1-2):
64–84.
11.
BOURDIEUP.1986. Distinction; A Social Critique of Judgements of
Taste.London: Routledge and Kegan
Paul.
12.
BROWNC.
(1994). Consumer Attitudes to Biotechnology in
Agriculture and Food; A Critical Review, IGB
Business Publications.
CLARKEA. ed
(1994) Genetic Counselling: Practice and
PrinciplesLondon:
Routledge
15.
CONRADP.
(1999) A mirage of genes, inSociology of Health and Illness,
21(2):
228–241
16.
CONRADP.,
and GabeJ.
(1999) Introduction: Sociological perspectives
on the new genetics: an overview.Sociology of Health and Illness,
21(5):
505–516
17.
COOKI.,
CrangP., and
ThorpeM.1998. ‘Biographies and Geographies; Consumer
Understandings of the Origins of Food’.British Food Journal100: 154–161.
18.
AMOSA,
Cunningham-BurleyS.,
and KerrA.,
(1998) The Social and Cultural Impact of the New
Genetics, ESRC: Risk and Human Behaviour
Newsletter.
19.
DENNETTD.
(1986). ‘Information, Technology and the Virtues
of Ignorance.’Daedalus115(3):
135–153.
20.
DETIENNEM.,
and VernantJ.L (eds).
1989. The Cuisine of Sacrifice among the
Greeks.Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
21.
DOUGLASM.1966. Purity and Danger; An Analysis of Concepts of
Pollution and Taboo.London: Routledge and Keegan
Paul.
22.
DOUGLASM.1970. Natural Symbols.London:
Penguin.
23.
DOUGLASM.1982a. In the Active Voice.London: Routledge and Keegan
Paul.
24.
DOUGLASM.1984(ed). Food in the Social Order.
New York: Basic
Books.
25.
DOUGLASM.1982. ‘Culture and Food’ in
DouglasM.
(ed.) In the Active Voice.London: Allen
Lane.
26.
DOUGLASM.
(1993). ‘Emotion and Culture in Theories of
Justice.’Economy and Society23(4):
501–15.
27.
DOUGLASM.
(1997). Thought Styles.London,
Sage.
28.
ELIASN.1978. The History of Manners.Oxford: Basil
Blackwell.
29.
FALKP.
(1995). The Consuming Body.London,
Sage.
30.
FALKP.1996. ‘Expelling Future Threats; some observations
on the magical world of vitamins’ in
EdgellS.,
HetheringtonK.,
and WardeA. (eds.)
Consumption Matters.Oxford: Blackwell/The
Sociological Review.
31.
FREWERL.
(1998). Risk Perception and Food Choice.Health, Ecological and Safety Aspects in Food
Choice, AIR-CAT 4th Plenary Meeting.
32.
FREWERL.,
HowardC.
(1995). ‘Genetic Engineering and Food. What
determines consumer acceptance?’British Food Journal97(8):
31–36.
33.
FREWERL.,
and ShepherdR.
(1994). ‘Attributing Information to Different
Sources; Effects on the perceived quality of information on the perceived
relevance of information and on attitude formation.’Public Understanding of Science3: 385–401.
34.
FREWERL.,
ShepherdR.
(1994). ‘The Interrelationship between perceived
knowledge, control and risk associated with a range of food related hazards
targeted at self, other people and society.’Journal of Food Safety14: 19–40.
35.
GATHM., and
AlvenslebenR.v.1997. ‘The Potential Effects of labelling GM foods
on Consumer Decisions’ - Preliminary Results of
Conjoint Measurement Experiments in Germany: Institute for Agricultural
Economics, University of Kiel,
Germany.
36.
GIDDENSA.
(1997). Sociology.London,
Polity.
37.
GOFTONL.R.
(1989). A Diet of Adultery.Times Higher Educational Supplement.
38.
GOFTONL.R.1990. ‘Food Fears and Time Famines; Some Social
Aspects of Choosing and Using Food’ in ‘Why We Eat
What We Eat’ British Nutrition Foundation 12th Annual Conference.Royal College of Physicians,
London.
39.
GOFTONL.,
RitsonC., and
KuznesovS.1998. Consumer Acceptability of Biotechnology in relation
to Food Products, with special reference to Farmed Fish.Luxembourg: European
Commision.
40.
GOFTONL.
(1996). Bread to Biotechnology;Cultural Aspects
of Food Ethics.Food Ethics. B. Mepham. London,
Wiley:
120–137.
41.
GOFTONL
(1999) Marketing Messages; An Introduction to Marketing
CommunicationsBlackhall,
Dublin
42.
GOTTWEISsH.
(1994). ‘Genetic Engineering, Democracy and the
Politics of Identity.’Social Text42: 127–152.
43.
HAIMESE.,
and WilliamsR.
(1998) Social Constructionism and the New
Technologies of Reproduction, in
VelodyI, and
WilliamsR.
eds The Politics of ConstructionismLondon:
Sage
44.
HAMSTRAA.1993. ‘Consumer Acceptance of Food Biotechnology;
The relation between product evaluation and acceptance’.
SWOKA, Den Haag:.
45.
HARBOTTLEL.
(1996). Bastard Chicken or
Gormadzeh? In Consumption Matters.EdgellS.,
HetheringtonK.,
WardeA..
Oxford,
Blackwell.
46.
HAWKESN.1999. ‘Biotech Firms Flourish amid the
Furore’ Times. London.
47.
HILEMANB.
(1995). Views differ sharply over benefits/risks
of biotechnology; Some scientists see it as a panacea for food supply
problems, others as a potential threat to ecological
systems.Chemical and Engineering News.
48.
HMSO
(1997). Genetic Modification and
Food.
49.
HOBANT.M.
(1997). ‘Consumer Acceptance of Biotechnology;
an International Perspective.’Nature Biotechnology15: 232–235.
50.
HOBANT.M.
(1997). ‘Consumer Acceptance of Biotechnology;
an International Perspective.’Nature Biotechnology15: 232–235.
51.
Human Genetics Advisory
Commission/Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
(1998) Cloning Issues in Reproduction, Science and
Medicine.HGAC/HFEA
52.
KERRM., and
CharlesN.
(1986). ‘Servers and Providers; the distribution
of food within the family.’The Sociological Review34(1):
115–57.
53.
LAPPEM., and
BaileyB.1999. Against the Grain;the Genetic Transformation of
Global Agriculture.London:
Earthscan.
54.
LEEMANSJ.
(1993). ‘Ti to Tomato, Tomato to Market. A
Decade of Plant Biotechnology.’Biotechnology11: 22–26.
55.
LEVI-STRAUSSC.1970. The Raw and the Cooked.London: Jonathan
Cape.
56.
MARTEAUT.,
and RichardsM. eds
(1996) The Troubled Helix.Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press
57.
MCGUIGANJ.1999. Modernity and Post modern Culture.Buckingham: Open University
Press.
58.
MILLERD1998, A Theory of ShoppingLondon,
Blackwell.
59.
MITCHELLV.,
and GreatorexM.1989. ‘Consumer Perceived Risk in the UK Food
Market’ British Food Journal,
92: 16–22.
60.
MURCOTTA.1982, ‘“On the Social Significance of the ‘Cooked
Dinner’ in South Wales”’.Social Science Information Vol. 21: pp.
677–696.
61.
O'MAHONYP.
(1999) Nature, Risk and ResponsibilityLondon:
Macmillan
62.
POLIS1997. ‘Verbrauchereinstellungen zur Gentechnik’.
Munich.cited in Gath & Alvensleben, 1997
63.
SCHEGLOFFE.,
and SacksH.1973. ‘Opening up Closings’.
Semiotica8: 289–327.
64.
SVENBROJ.1984. ‘The Division of Meat in Classical
Antiquity’ in de
GarineI. (ed.) Conference
paper presented at Food Sharing.Bad Homburg, Werner Reimer Stiftung. December
12
65.
SYKESR.1999. ‘We must support our GM food
industry’ Independent.
London.14/9/99
66.
THOMPSONK.
(1998) Moral PanicsLondon:
Routledge.
67.
TIZZARDJ.
(1999) Parliament and
procreation, Progress in Reproduction,
3(2):
6–7
68.
VALENTINEG.1999. ‘Eating In; Home Consumption and
Identity’.The Sociological Review:491–524.
