Fieldwork is wrought with challenges and emotional obstacles. Techniques of dealing with these logistical challenges are well discussed in the literature; however, rarely are the emotions involved in fieldwork explored, nor are the specific techniques for dealing with this emotional fallout. In this paper, I explore not only the emotions of fieldwork, specifically as a woman in a male dominated research setting, but actual tactics for dealing with these feelings - tactics I call ‘flanking gestures.’ Flanking gestures are techniques that allow the researcher to blur and stretch their gender, which I suggest provides a certain amount of emotional relief in the field.
AdamsLaura. 1999, The mascot researcher: identity, power and knowledge in fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography28 (4): p. 331–63. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124199129023479]
2.
Baca ZinnMaxine. 2001. Insider field research in minority communities In Contemporary Field Research, edited by EmersonR. M.. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press, Inc.
3.
BenzTerressa A.2006. The ever watchful eye and making it blink: social control and tactics of everyday resistance in a residential hotel. Masters, Criminology, Law and Society, University of California, Irvine.
4.
BleeKathleen M.2002. Inside organized racism: women in the hate movement. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
DanielsArlene Kaplan. 1983, Self-deception and self-discovery in fieldwork. Qualitative Sociology6 (3): 195–214. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00987446]
6.
Dickson-SwiftVirginia, JamesErica L., KippenSandra, and LiamputtongPranee. 2007, Doing sensitive research: what challenges do qualitative researchers face?Qualitative Research7 (3): p. 327–353. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468794107078515]
7.
Dickson-SwiftVirginia, JamesErica L., KippenSandra, and LiamputtongPranee. 2009, Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work. Qualitative Research9 (1): p. 61–79. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468794108098031]
8.
DuneierMitchell. 1992. Slim's table: race, respectability, and masculinity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
DuneierMitchell, and CarterOvie. 2001. Sidewalk. 1st pbk. ed. New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux.
10.
DunnLinda. 1991, Research alert! Qualitative research may be hazardous to your health!Qualitative Health Research1: p. 388–92. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104973239100100307]
11.
GilliomJohn. 2001. Overseers of the poor: surveillance, resistance, and the limits of privacy, The Chicago series in law and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
GurneyJoan Neff. 1985, Not one of the guys: The female researcher in a male-dominated setting. Qualitative Sociology8 (1): p. 42–62. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00987013]
13.
HollandJanet. 2007, Emotions and Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology10 (3): 195–209. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645570701541894]
14.
HorowitzRuth. 1983. Honor and the American dream: culture and identity in a Chicano community. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
15.
JohnsonBarbara, and ClarkeJill Macleod. 2003, Collecting sensitive data: the impact on researchers. Qualitative Health Research13 (3): p. 421–434.
16.
KleinmanSherryl, and CoppMartha A.. 1993. Emotions and Fieldwork. Newbury Park: Sage.
17.
LiebowElliot. 1993. Tell them who I am: the lives of homeless women. New York: Maxwell Macmillan.
18.
LoflandJohn. 2006. Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. 4th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.
19.
MazzeiJulie, and O'BrienErin E.. 2009, You got it, so when do you flaunt it?: building rapport, intersectionality, and the strategic deployment of gender in the field. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography38 (3): p. 358–83.
20.
RagerKathleen B.2005, Self-care and the qualitative researcher: when collecting data can break your heart. Educational Researcher34 (4): p. 23–27. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034004023]
21.
SampsonHelen, BloorMichael, and FinchamBen. 2008, A price worth paying?: Considering the ‘cost’ of reflexive research methods and the influence of feminist ways of ‘doing’. Sociology42 (5): p. 919–933. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094570]
22.
SchachtSteven P.1997, Feminist fieldwork in the mysogynist setting of the rugby pitch. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography26 (3): p. 338–363. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124197026003004]
23.
WarrenCarol A. B.2001. Gender and fieldwork relations. In Contemporary Field Methods, edited by EmersonR. M.. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press Inc.
24.
WarrenCarol A. B., and RasmussenPaul K.. 1977, Sex and gender in field research. Urban Life6 (3): p. 349–369.
