This article considers the ways in which power and gender are practiced in the interactional situations of interview refusals in organizational research. The research draws on two episodes of male telemarketers’ refusals in the context of call centers. Utilizing an ethnographic approach together with nonparticipant observations enabled the analysis of the interview refusals while providing valid and informative data. By arguing that gender is filtered into the interaction particularly through power negotiations and actualized for the most part in conflict between the female researcher and the male participants, the article offers an example of how gender can shape and influence the data collection process.
Arendell, Terry.1997. Reflections on the researcher-researched relationship: A woman interviewing men. Qualitative Sociology20:341-68.
2.
Atkinson, Dorothy.1993. Relating. In Reflecting on research practice: Issues in health and social welfare, ed. Pam Shakespeare , Dorothy Atkinson, and Sally French, Milton Keynes , 57-69. UK: Open University Press.
3.
Buchanan, Ruth, and Sarah Koch-Schulte.2000. Gender on the line: Technology, restructuring and the reorganization of work in the call centre industry. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.
4.
Butera, Karina J.2006. Manhunt. The challenge of enticing men to participate in a study on friendship. Qualitative Inquiry12:1262-82.
5.
Cameron, Deborah.2000. Good to talk? Living and working in a communication culture . London: SAGE.
6.
Connell, Raewyn.2005. Advancing gender reform in large-scale organisations: A new approach for practitioners and researchers. Policy and Society24 (4): 1-21.
7.
DeVault, Marjorie L.1999. Liberating method. Feminism and social research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
8.
Fontana, Andrea, and James H. Frey.1994. Interviewing. The art of science. In Handbook of qualitative Research, ed. Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 361-76. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
Goodwin, Dawn, Catherine Pope, Maggie Mort, and Andrew Smith.2003. Ethics and ethnography: An experiential account. Qualitative Health Research13:567-77.
10.
Grenz, Sabine.2005. Intersections of sex and power in research on prostitution: A female researcher interviewing male heterosexual clients. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society30 (4): 2091-2113.
11.
Haraway, Donna.1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women. The reinvention of nature . London: Free Association Books .
12.
Hoffmann, Elizabeth A.2007. Open-ended interviews, power, and emotional labor. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography36:318-46.
13.
Horn, Rebecca.1997. Not "one of the boys": Women researching the police. Journal of Gender Studies6:297-308.
14.
Ikonen, Hanna-Mari, and Hanna Ojala.2007. Creating togetherness and experiencing difference in feminist interviews. Knowing in a post-standpoint way? Graduate Journal of Social Science4 (2): 80-103.
15.
Kleinman, Sherryl, and Martha Copp.1993. Emotions and fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
16.
Koivunen, Tuija. ( 2007) Embodied voice and embodied differences in call centre work. In Linköping electronic conference proceedings, issue25, 317-27. Linköping , Sweden: Linköping University Electronic Press .
17.
Korczynski, Marek.2003. Communities of coping: Collective emotional labour in service work. Organization10:55-79.
18.
Korvajärvi, Päivi.2002. Gender-neutral gender and denial of the difference. In Casting the other. The production and maintenance of inequalities in work organizations, ed. Barbara Czarniawska and Heather Höpfl, 119-37. London: Routledge.
19.
Lappalainen, Tuomo.2007. Ammattien arvostus 2007 [The esteem of occupations in 2007]. Suomen Kuvalehti91 (45): 50-55.
20.
Lee, Deborah.1997. Interviewing men: Vulnerabilities and dilemmas. Women’s Studies International Forum20:553-64.
21.
Loe, Meika.2004. The rise of Viagra. How the little blue pill changed sex in America. New York: New York University Press.
22.
Martin, Patricia Yancey.2001. "Mobilizing masculinities": Women’s experiences of men at work. Organization8:587-618.
23.
Martin, Patricia Yancey.2003. "Said and done" versus "saying and doing." Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender & Society17:342-66.
24.
Martin, Patricia Yancey.2006. Practicing gender at work: Further thoughts on reflexivity . Gender, Work and Organization13:254-276.
25.
Murphy, Elizabeth, and Robert Dingwall .2001. The ethics of ethnography . In Handbook of ethnography, ed. Paul Atkinson, Amanda Coffey, Sara Delamont, John Lofland , and Lyn Lofland, 339-51. London : SAGE.
26.
Pascoe, C.J.2007. Dude you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
Pierce, Jennifer L.1995. Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms . Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
Presser, Lois.2005. Negotiating power and narrative in research: Implications for feminist methodology. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society30 (4): 2067-90.
29.
Reger, J.o. 2001. Emotions, objectivity and voice: An analysis of a "failed" participant observation. Women’s Studies International Forum24:605-16.
30.
Reinharz, Shulamit, and Susan E. Chase.2002. Interviewing women. In Handbook of interviewing research, ed. Jaber F. Gubrium and James A. Holstein , 221-38. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
Schwalbe, Michael L., and Michelle Wolkomir .2002. Interviewing men. In Handbook of interviewing research, ed. Jaber F. Gubrium & James A. Holstein , 203-19. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
Sin, Chih Hoong.2005. Seeking informed consent: Reflections on research practice . Sociology39:277-94.
33.
Skeggs, Beverly.2001. Feminist ethnography. In Handbook of ethnography , ed. Paul Atkinson, Amanda Coffey, Sara Delamont , John Lofland, and Lyn Lofland, 426-42. London: SAGE.
34.
Smith, Dorothy E.2002. Institutional ethnography. In Qualitative research in action, ed. Tim May, 17-52. London : SAGE.
35.
Soilevuo Grønnerød, Jarna.2004. On the meanings and uses of laughter in research interviews. Relationships between interviewed men and a woman interviewer. Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research12 (1): 31-49.
36.
Vehviläinen, Marja.1999. Gender and computing in retrospect-The case of Finland . IEEE Annals of the History of Computing21 (2): 44-51.
37.
West, Candace, and Don H. Zimmerman.2002. Doing gender. In Doing gender doing difference. Inequality, power, and institutional change, ed. Sarah Fenstermaker and Candace West, 3-23. New York: Routledge.
38.
Wilkins, Richard J., and Pekka Isotalus.2009. Finnish speech culture. In Speech culture in Finland, ed. Richard Wilkins and Pekka Isotalus, 1-14. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
