The title of this paper gives a family-like character to animals and an animal-like character to the idea of family. It emphasises the close, family and friend-like relationships that can exist between human beings and the animals who share their domestic space. This type of relationship between humans and their pets emerged during a study of families and kinship and in this paper we draw on 193 in-depth interviews conducted in four contrasting areas of a South Wales city. Although our interview schedules did not explicitly ask about animals, a significant proportion of our interviewees spontaneously included their pets as part of their kinship networks. There were two points during the interview when the significance of pets became apparent: when interviewees were asked who counted as family and when they were asked to complete a network diagram. In studies of kinship it has been said that pets are substitutes for children, providing emotional satisfaction. Here we explore some of the other ways in which animals are constructed as kin and discuss whether such constructions confound the (socially constructed) boundary between nature and culture.
AndersonP K (2003). ‘A bird in the house: an anthropological perspective on companion parrots’ inSociety and Animals, 11(4):
2.
ArlukeA, and SandersC R (1996) Regarding animals, Temple University Press: Philadelphia
3.
BeckerB, and CharlesN (2006). Layered meanings: the construction of the family in the interview, in Community, Work and Family, 9(2): 101–122.
4.
BirkeL (1994) Feminism, animals and science: the naming of the shrew, Open University Press: Buckingham/Philadelphia
5.
BonasS, McNicholasJ, and CollisG M (2000) ‘Pets in the network of family relationships: an empirical study’ in PodberscekA L, PaulE S, and SerpellJ (eds) Companion animals and us: exploring the relationships between people and pets, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 209–236
6.
BudianskyS (2002). The truth about dogs: the ancestry, social conventions, mental habits and moral fibre of canis familiaris, Phoenix: London
7.
CarterA (1981). The bloody chamber and other stories, Penguin
8.
CharlesN., DaviesC, and HarrisC (2008) Families in Transition: patterns of family formation and kinship networks, The Policy Press: Bristol
9.
CharlesN, and DaviesC (2005). ‘Studying the particular illuminating the general: community studies and community in Wales’ inSociological Review, 53(4): 672–690.
10.
DurrellG (1959) My family and other animals, Penguin: Harmondsworth
11.
Enders-SlegersM-J (2000) ‘The meaning of companion animals: qualitative analysis of the life histories of elderly cat and dog owners’ in PodberscekA L, PaulE S, and SerpellJ (eds) Companion animals and us: exploring the relationships between people and pets, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp 237–256
12.
FlynnC P (2001) ‘Acknowledging the “Zoological connection”: a sociological analysis of animal cruelty’ inSociety and Animals9(1):
13.
FoxR (2008). ‘Animal behaviours, post-human lives: everyday negotiations of the animal-human divide in pet-keeping’ inSocial & Cultural Geography, 7(4): 525–537.
14.
FranklinA (1999) Animals and Modern Cultures, Polity Press: Cambridge
GrandinT, and JohnsonC (2006) Animals in translation: using the mysteries of autism to decode animal behaviour, Bloomsbury: London
17.
THE GUARDIAN NEWSPAPER, 20/5/08
18.
HansenK.V. (2005) Not-so-nuclear families: Class, gender, and networks of care, New Brunswick, New Jersey and London: Rutgers University Press.
19.
HarawayD (2003) The companion species manifesto: dogs, people and significant otherness, Prickly Paradigm Press: Chicago
20.
HarawayD (2008) When species meet, University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis
21.
HoganL, MetzgerD, and PetersonB (1998) Introduction in HoganL., MetzgerD., and PetersonB. (eds) Intimate nature: the bond between women and animals, Fawcett Books/The Ballantine Publishing Group: New York, pp. xi–xvi
22.
IngoldT (1994) ‘From trust to domination: an alternative history of human-animal relations’ in ManningA., and SerpellJ. (eds) Animals and human society: changing perspectives, Routledge: London and New York, pp. 1–22
23.
KennaM (2008). ‘Beauty and the Beast: an anthropological approach to a fairy tale’, paper presented to GENCAS, Swansea University, June 21st
24.
KnappC (1998) Pack of Two: The Intricate Bond Between People and Dogs, Delta: New York
25.
MidgleyM (1983) Animals and why they matter, University of Georgia Press: Athens
26.
MidgleyM (1994) ‘Bridge-building at last’ in ManningA., and SerpellJ. (eds) Animals and human society: changing perspectives, Routledge: London and New York, pp 188–194
27.
NewtonT (2007) Nature and sociologyRoutledge: London and NewYork
28.
PahlR, and SPENCERE (2004a). ‘Personal communities: not simply families of ‘fate’ or ‘choice’ inCurrent Sociology, 52(2): 199–221.
29.
PahlR, and SpencerE (2004b) ‘Capturing personal communities’ in PhillipsonC., AllanG., and MorganD. (eds) Social networks and social exclusion: sociological and policy perspectives, Ashgate: Aldershot, pp. 72–96
30.
PhillipsonC, BernardM, PhillipsJ, and OggJ (2000) The Family and Community Life of Older People: Social Networks and Social Support in Three Urban Areas, London: Routledge
31.
PlumwoodV (2002) Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason, Routledge: London
32.
PullmanP (1995) Northern Lights, Scholastic Point: London
33.
PullmanP (1997) The Subtle Knife, Scholastic Point: London
34.
PullmanP (2000) The Amber Spyglass, Scholastic Point: London
35.
RosserC, and HarrisC C (1965) The family and social change, RKP: London
36.
RowlandsM (2002) Animals like us, Verso: London and New York
37.
SerpellJ (1996). In the company of animals: a study of human-animal relationships, (first edition 1986) Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
38.
SerpellJ, and PaulE (1994) ‘Pets and the development of positive attitudes to animals’ in ManningA., and SerpellJ. (eds) Animals and human society: changing perspectives, Routledge: London and New York, pp 127–144
39.
SOED (1973) The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford University Press: Oxford
40.
SpencerL, and PahlR (2006) Rethinking friendship: hidden solidarities today, Princeton University Press: Princeton and Oxford
41.
StrathernM (1992) After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
42.
ThomasK (1983) Man and the natural world: changing attitudes in England 1500-1800, Allen Lane: London
43.
WeeksJ., HeaphyB., and DonovanC. (2001) Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments, London: Routledge.
44.
WoodL J, Giles-CortiB, BulsaraM K, BoschD A (2007). ‘More than a furry companion: the ripple effect of companion animals on neighbourhood interactions and sense of community’ inSociety and Animals, 15(1):
