After a brief consideration of the definition and importance of mediation, statistical tests for mediation are reviewed, including the joint significance of the two effects involved in the mediation, the Sobel test and its variants, resampling with the bootstrap, Bayesian estimation using MCMC simulation, and the effect ratio. A structural-equation-modeling (SEM) perspective on mediation then introduces the alternative scenarios that could yield a false-positive mediation finding. Design-based, partial solutions are advanced for problems of measurement, uncontrolled common causes, and temporal ordering that can confound mediation analysis. Next, the issue of heterogeneity of effects and statistical interactions in mediation analyses are addressed, including a discussion of moderated mediation and mediated moderation. Finally, the relation of mediation analysis to experimentation is discussed, with attention to the possibility of creatively integrating SEM-based mediation analysis and experimental design.
AntonakisJ., BendahanS., JacquartP., & LaliveR. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1086–1120. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010
2.
ArbuckleJ. (2009). Amos 18 User's Guide.Chicago: Amos Development Corporation.
3.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
4.
BollenK. A., & CurranP. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
5.
BowersK. S., & WoodyE. Z. (1996). Hypnotic amnesia and the paradox of intentional forgetting. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 381–390. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.105.3.381
6.
BullockJ. G., GreenD. P., & HaS. E. (2008). Experimental approaches to mediation: A new guide for assessing causal pathways. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
7.
BullockJ. G., GreenD. P., & HaS. E. (2010). Yes, but what's the mechanism? (Don't expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550–558. doi: 10.1037/a0018933
8.
ColeD. A., & MaxwellS. E. (2003). Testing mediation with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558
9.
DuncanT. E., DuncanS. C., & StryckerL. A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
DwyerJ. H. (1983). Statistical models for the social and behavioral sciences.New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
EdwardsJ. R., & LambertL. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
12.
FritzM. S., & MacKinnonD. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x
13.
GergenK. J. (1989). The possibility of psychological knowledge: A hermeneutic inquiry. In PackerM. J., & AddisonR. B. (Eds.), Entering the circle: Hermeneutic investigation in psychology (pp. 239–258). Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
GilovichT. (2009, May). Where the mind goes. The Third Annual Ziva Kunda Memorial Lecture, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.
15.
Goodman, (1960). On the exact variance of products. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55, 708–713.
16.
HargadonR., BowersK. S., & WoodyE. Z. (1995). Does counter-pain imagery mediate hypnotic analgesia?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 508–516. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.104.3.508
17.
HayesA. F., & PreacherK. J. (2010). Quantifying and testing indirect effects in simple mediation models when the constituent paths are nonlinear. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 627–660. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2010.498290
18.
HermanC. P., & MackD. (1975). Restrained and unrestrained eating. Journal of Personality, 43, 647–660. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00727.x
19.
HermanC. P., & PolivyJ. (1980). Restrained eating. In StunkardA. J. (Ed.), Obesity (pp. 208–225). London: W.B. Saunders.
20.
HerschbergerS. L. (1994). The specification of equivalent models before the collection of data. In von EyeA., & CloggC. C. (Eds.), Latent variables analysis (pp. 68–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
JamesL. R., & BrettJ. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307–321. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.307
22.
JuddC. M., & KennyD. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619. doi: 10.1177/0193841X8100500502
23.
JuddC. M., & KennyD. A. (2010). Data analysis in social psychology: Recent and recurring issues. In FiskeS. T., GilbertD. T., & LindzeyG., Handbook of social psychology, vol. 1 (pp. 115–139). New York: Wiley.
24.
KennyD. A. (1979). Correlation and causality.New York: Wiley.
25.
KesslerR. C. (1987). The interplay of research design strategies and data analysis procedures in evaluating the effects of stress on health. In KaslS. V., & CooperC. L. (Eds.), Stress and health: Issues in research methodology (pp. 113–140). New York: Wiley.
26.
KraemerH. C., KiernanM., EssexM., & KupferD. J. (2008). How and why criteria defining moderators and mediators differ between the Baron & Kenny and MacArthur approaches. Health Psychology, 27, S101–S108.
27.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
28.
LeeS., & HerschbergerS. L. (1990). A simple rule for generating equivalent models in covariance structure modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 313–334.
29.
LykkenD. T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151–159. doi: 10.1037/h0026141
30.
MacCallumR. C., WegenerD. T., UchinoB. N., & FabrigarL. R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185–199. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.185
31.
MacKinnonD. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
MacKinnonD. P., & FairchildA. J. (2009). Current directions in mediation analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 16–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01598.x
33.
MacKinnonD. P., LockwoodC. M., HoffmanJ. M., WestS. G., & SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
34.
MacKinnonD. P., LockwoodC. M., & WilliamsJ. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
35.
MaxwellS. E., & ColeD. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23–44. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23
36.
McArdleJ. J., & HamagamiF. (2001). Latent difference score structural models for linear dynamic analyses with incomplete longitudinal data. In CollinsL. M., & SayerA. G. (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 137–175). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10409-005
37.
MeehlP. E. (1990). Appraising and amending theories: The strategy of Lakatosian defense and two principles that warrant it. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 108–141. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0102_1
38.
MullerD., JuddC. M., & YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852
39.
MullerD., YzerbytV., & JuddC. M. (2010). Can a variable be both a mediator and a moderator? Paper presented at the 11th Annual Meeting for the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Las Vegas, Nevada.
40.
MyersJ. L. (1979). Fundamentals of experimental design (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
41.
PreacherK. J., & HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling procedures for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
42.
PreacherK. J., RuckerD. D., & HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.
43.
PreacherK. J., ZyphurM. J., & ZhangZ. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209–233. doi: 10.1037/a0020141
44.
SadlerP., & WoodyE. (2003). Is who you are who you're talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarity in mixed-sex interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 80–96. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.80
45.
ShroutP. E., & BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
46.
ShroutP. E., & BolgerN. (2010, January). Refining inferences about mediated effects in studies of personality and social psychological processes. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Meeting for the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Las Vegas, Nevada.
47.
SobelM. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In LeinhardtS. (Ed.), Sociological methodology, 1982 (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. doi: 10.2307/270723
48.
SobelM. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312.
49.
SpanosN. P. (1986). Hypnotic behavior: A social-psychological interpretation of amnesia, analgesia, and “trance logic”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 449–467. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00046537
50.
SpencerS. J., ZannaM. P., & FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
51.
Stone-RomeroE. F., & RoposaP. (2008). The relative validity of inferences about mediation as a function of research design characteristics. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 326–352. doi: 10.1177/1094428107300342
52.
WeibeR. E., & McCabeS. B. (2002). Relationship perfectionism, dysphoria, and hostile interpersonal behaviours. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21, 67–91.
53.
ZannaM. P., & FazioR. H. (1982). The attitude-behavior relation: Moving toward a third generation of research. In ZannaM. P., HigginsE. T., & HermanC. P. (Eds.), Consistency in social behavior: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 2, pp. 283–301). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
