FischerJJ, SamadyH, McPhersonJA. Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol2002; 90: 210–5.
4.
WindeckerS, KolhP, AlfonsoF. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J2014; 35: 2541–619.
5.
MontalescotG, SechtemU, AchenbachS. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J2013; 34: 2949–3003.
6.
PijlsNH, De BruyneB, PeelsK. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med1996; 334: 1703–8.
7.
WatkinsS, McGeochR, LyneJ. Validation of magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary heart disease. Circulation2009; 120: 2207–13.
8.
CorcoranD, YoungR, AdlamD. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the CE-MARC 2 coronary physiology sub-study. Int J Cardiol2018; 266: 7–14.
9.
MundhenkeM, SchwartzkopffB, StrauerBE. Structural analysis of arteriolar and myocardial remodelling in the subendocardial region of patients with hypertensive heart disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Virchows Archiv1997; 431: 265–73.
10.
CampbellDJ, SomaratneJB, JenkinsAJ. Differences in myocardial structure and coronary microvasculature between men and women with coronary artery disease. Hypertension2011; 57: 186–92.
11.
FearonWF, BalsamLB, FarouqueHM. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation2003; 107: 3129–32.
12.
FearonWF, LowAF, YongAS. Prognostic value of the index of microcirculatory resistance measured after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation2013; 127: 2436–41.
13.
PatelMR, DaiD, HernandezAF. Prevalence and predictors of nonobstructive coronary artery disease identified with coronary angiography in contemporary clinical practice. Am Heart J2014; 167: 846–52.e2.
14.
Chest Pain of Recent Onset: Assessment and Diagnosis (CG95). London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2010 (Updated 2016).
15.
BrownKA. Prognostic value of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging: a diagnostic tool comes of age. Circulation1991; 83: 363–81.
16.
GreenwoodJP, RipleyDP, BerryC. Effect of care guided by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, or NICE Guidelines on subsequent unnecessary angiography rates: the CE-MARC 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA2016; 316: 1051–60.
17.
NagelE, GreenwoodJP, McCannGP. Magnetic resonance perfusion or fractional flow reserve in coronary disease. N Engl J Med2019; 380: 2418–28.
18.
ShethS, BritoR, MukherjeaD. Adenosine receptors: expression, function and regulation. Int J Mol Sci2014; 15: 2024–52.
19.
MorrowA, FordTJ, BroganR. Incidence of acute bronchospasm during systemic adenosine administration for coronary angiography. J R Coll Physicians Edinb2019; 49: 204–6.
20.
FairbairnTA, NiemanK, AkasakaT. Real-world clinical utility and impact on clinical decision-making of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from the ADVANCE Registry. Eur Heart J2018; 39: 3701–11.