Study goals were to (1) understand the attitudes of employees in low-wage industries toward workplace health promotion, including views on appropriateness of employer involvement in employee health and level of interest in workplace health promotion overall and in specific programs, and (2) determine the potential for extending workplace health promotion to spouses and partners of these employees.
Approach.
The study used 42 interviews of 60 to 90 minutes.
Setting.
Interviews were conducted with couples (married or living together) in the Seattle/King County metropolitan area of Washington State.
Participants.
Study participants were forty-two couples with one or more members working in one of five low-wage industries: accommodation/food services, education, health care/social assistance, manufacturing, and retail trade.
Method.
The study employed qualitative analysis of interview transcripts using grounded theory to identify themes.
Results.
Employees consider workplace health promotion both appropriate and desirable and believe it benefits employers through increased productivity and morale. Most have little personal experience with it and doubt their employers would prioritize employee health. Employees are most interested in efforts focused on nutrition and physical activity. Both employees and their partners support extending workplace health promotion to include partners.
Conclusion.
Employees and their partners are interested in workplace health promotion if it addresses behaviors they care about. Concern over employer involvement in their personal health decisions is minimal; instead, employees view employer interest in their health as a sign that they are valued.
HeronM. Deaths: Leading causes for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep.2012;60(6):1–94.
2.
LoeppkeRTaitelMHaufleV. Health and productivity as a business strategy: A multiemployer study. J Occup Environ Med.2009;51:411–428.
3.
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The power of prevention chronic disease … the public health challenge of the 21st century; 2009. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/pdf/2009-power-of-prevention.pdf. Accessed January 31, 2013.
4.
HuangYHannonPAWilliamsBHarrisJR. Workers' health risk behaviors by state, demographic characteristics, and health insurance status. Prev Chronic Dis.2011;8(1):A12.
5.
BaickerKCutlerDSongZ. Workplace wellness programs can generate savings. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:304–311.
6.
MelloMMRosenthalMB. Wellness programs and lifestyle discrimination—the legal limits. N Engl J Med.2008;359:192–199.
7.
BondiMAHarrisJRAtkinsD. Employer coverage of clinical preventive services in the United States. Am J Health Promot. 2006;20:214–222.
8.
LinnanLA. The business case for employee health: What we know and what we need to do. N C Med J.2010;71:69–74.
9.
CrimminsTJHalbergJ. Measuring success in creating a “culture of health.”J Occup Environ Med.2009;51:351–355.
10.
LemonSCZapkaJLiW. Step ahead a worksite obesity prevention trial among hospital employees. Am J Prev Med.2010;38:27–38.
11.
SchultTMMcGovernPMDowdBPronkNP. The future of health promotion/disease prevention programs: The incentives and barriers faced by stakeholders. J Occup Environ Med.2006;48:541–548.
12.
US Dept of Commerce, US Census Bureau. Statistics about business size (including small business) from the U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: http://www.census.gov/econ/smallbus.html. Accessed January 31, 2013.
13.
HarrisJRHuangYHannonPAWilliamsB. Low-socioeconomic status workers: Their health risks and how to reach them. J Occup Environ Med.2011;53:132–138.
14.
HannonPAGarsonGHarrisJR. Workplace health promotion implementation, readiness, and capacity among midsize employers in low-wage industries: A national survey. J Occup Environ Med.2012;54:1337–1343.
15.
HannonPAHammerbackKGarsonG. Stakeholder perspectives on workplace health promotion: A qualitative study of midsized employers in low-wage industries. Am J Health Promot. 2012;27:103–110.
16.
LassenABruselius-JensenMSommerHM. Factors influencing participation rates and employees' attitudes toward promoting healthy eating at blue-collar worksites. Health Educ Res.2007;22:727–736.
17.
SorensenGBarbeauEMStoddardAM. Tools for health: The efficacy of a tailored intervention targeted for construction laborers. Cancer Causes Control. 2007;18:51–59.
18.
GabelJRWhitmoreHPickreignJ. Obesity and the workplace: Current programs and attitudes among employers and employees. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28:46–56.
19.
LomaLMcLuskeyJ. Pumping up the pressure: A qualitative evaluation of a workplace health promotion initiative for male employees. Health Educ J.2005;64:88–95.
20.
AndersonLMQuinnTAGlanzK. The effectiveness of worksite nutrition and physical activity interventions for controlling employee overweight and obesity: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med.2009;37:340–357.
21.
SorensenGStoddardAOckeneJK. Worker participation in an integrated health promotion/health protection program: Results from the WellWorks project. Health Educ Q.1996;23:191–203.
22.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC health disparities and inequalities report—United States 2011. MMWR. 2011;60(suppl):1–114.
23.
Margerison-ZilkoCCubbinC. Socioeconomic disparities in tobacco-related health outcomes across racial/ethnic groups in the United States: National health interview survey 2010. Nicotine Tob Res.2013;15:1161–1165.
24.
PampelFCKruegerPMDenneyJT. Socioeconomic disparities in health behaviors. Annu Rev Sociol. 2010;36:349–370.
25.
ThompsonSESmithBABybeeRF. Factors influencing participation in worksite wellness programs among minority and underserved populations. Fam Community Health. 2005;28:267–273.
26.
FungK. Type 2 Diabetes: A Couples Study on Spousal Relationship and Health Behaviors [Dietrich College Honors Theses Paper 12]. Pittsburgh, Pa: Carnegie Mellon University; 2009. Available from: http://repository.cmu.edu/hsshonors/12. Accessed January 31, 2013.
27.
PadulaCASullivanM. Long-term married couples' health promotion behaviors: Identifying factors that impact decision-making. J Gerontol Nurs.2006;32:37–47.
28.
TriefPMMorinPCIzquierdoR. Marital quality and diabetes outcomes: The IDEATel Project. Fam Syst Health. 2006;24:318–331.
29.
TuckerJSAndersSL. Social control of health behaviors in marriage. J Appl Soc Psych. 2001;31:467–485.
30.
TongASainsburyPCraigJ. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–357.
31.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. May 2007 national industry-specific occupational employment and wage estimates. Available at: www.bls.gov/oes/current/oessrci.htm. Accessed August 7, 2013.
32.
GreenBBCheadleAPellegriniASHarrisJR. Active For Life: A work-based physical activity program. Prev Chronic Dis.2007;4:A63.
National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety. Essential elements of effective workplace programs and policies for improving worker health and wellbeing; 2008. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2010-140/pdfs/2010-140.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2013.
36.
LinnanLASorensenGColditzG. Using theory to understand the multiple determinants of low participation in worksite health promotion programs. Health Educ Behav. 2001;28:591–607.
37.
LinnanLBowlingMChildressJ. Results of the 2004 National Worksite Health Promotion Survey. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1503–1509.
38.
SorensenGBarbeauEHuntMKEmmonsK. Reducing social disparities in tobacco use: A social-contextual model for reducing tobacco use among blue-collar workers. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:230–239.
