Study goals were to (1) describe stakeholder perceptions of workplace health promotion (WHP) appropriateness, (2) describe barriers and facilitators to implementing WHP, (3) learn the extent to which WHP programs are offered to workers' spouses and partners and assess attitudes toward including partners in WHP programs, and (4) describe willingness to collaborate with nonprofit agencies to offer WHP.
Design.
Five 1.5-hour focus groups.
Setting.
The focus groups were conducted with representatives of midsized (100–999 workers) workplaces in the Seattle metropolitan area, Washington state.
Subjects.
Thirty-four human resources professionals in charge of WHP programs and policies from five low-wage industries: accommodation/food services, manufacturing, health care/social assistance, education, and retail trade.
Measures.
A semistructured discussion guide.
Analysis.
Qualitative analysis of focus group transcripts using grounded theory to identify themes.
Results.
Most participants viewed WHP as appropriate, but many expressed reservations about intruding in workers' personal lives. Barriers to implementing WHP included cost, time, logistical challenges, and unsupportive culture. Participants saw value in extending WHP programs to workers' partners, but were unsure how to do so. Most were willing to work with nonprofit agencies to offer WHP.
Conclusion.
Midsized, low-wage employers face significant barriers to implementing WHP; to reach these employers and their workers, nonprofit agencies and WHP vendors need to offer WHP programs that are inexpensive, turnkey, and easy to adapt.
Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Guide to community preventive services. Available at: www.thecommunityguide.org. Accessed May 5, 2011.
2.
Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Interventions to promote seasonal influenza vaccinations among non-healthcare workers: Task Force finding & rational statement. Available at: www.thecommunityguide.org/worksite/RRflunon-hcw.html. Accessed August 4, 2011.
3.
HopkinsDPRaziSLeeksKD. Smokefree policies to reduce tobacco use. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med.2010;38(suppl 2):S275–S289.
4.
KatzDLO'ConnellMYehMC. Public health strategies for preventing and controlling overweight and obesity in school and worksite settings: A report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. MMWR Recomm Rep.2005;54(RR-10):1–12.
5.
AndersonLMQuinnTAGlanzK. The effectiveness of worksite nutrition and physical activity interventions for controlling employee overweight and obesity: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med.2009;37:340–357.
6.
Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Recommendations to increase physical activity in communities. Am J Prev Med.2002;22(suppl 4):67–72.
7.
SolerRELeeksKDBuchananLR. Point-of-decision prompts to increase stair use. A systematic review update. Am J Prev Med.2010;38(suppl 2):S292–S300.
8.
BaronRCRimerBKCoatesRJ. Client-directed interventions to increase community access to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review. Am J Prev Med.2008;35(suppl 1):S56–S66.
9.
BondiMAHarrisJRAtkinsD. Employer coverage of clinical preventive services in the United States. Am J Health Promot. 2006;20:214–222.
10.
LinnanLBowlingMChildressJ. Results of the 2004 National Worksite Health Promotion Survey. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1503–1509.
11.
HenkeRMGoetzelRZMcHughJIsaacF. Recent experience in health promotion at Johnson & Johnson: Lower health spending, strong return on investment. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30:490–499.
12.
GoetzelRZRoemerECPeiX. Second-year results of an obesity prevention program at the Dow Chemical Company. J Occup Environ Med.2010;52:291–302.
13.
NaydeckBLPearsonJAOzminkowskiRJ. The impact of the Highmark employee wellness programs on 4-year healthcare costs. J Occup Environ Med.2008;50:146–156.
14.
ShortMEGoetzelRZYoungJS. Measuring changes in lipid and blood glucose values in the health and wellness program of Prudential Financial, Inc.J Occup Environ Med.2010;52:797–806.
15.
BeresfordSALockeEBishopS. Worksite study promoting activity and changes in eating (PACE): Design and baseline results. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15(suppl 1):4S–15S.
16.
BeresfordSAThompsonBBishopS. Long-term fruit and vegetable change in worksites: Seattle 5 a Day follow-up. Am J Health Behav.2010;34:707–720.
17.
HuntMKBarbeauEMLedermanR. Process evaluation results from the Healthy Directions–Small Business study. Health Educ Behav.2007;34:90–107.
18.
SorensenGBarbeauEMStoddardAM. Tools for health: The efficacy of a tailored intervention targeted for construction laborers. Cancer Causes Control. 2007;18:51–59.
19.
HarrisJRHuangYHannonPAWilliamsB. Low-SES workers: Health risks and how to reach them. J Occup Environ Med.2011;53:132–138.
20.
McDonnellSBryantCHarrisJ. The private partners of public health: Public-private alliances for public good. Prev Chronic Dis.2009;6:A69.
21.
HuangYHannonPAWilliamsBHarrisJR. Workers' health risk behaviors by state, demographic characteristics, and health insurance status. Prev Chronic Dis.2011;8:A12.
22.
HughesMCHannonPAHarrisJRPatrickDL. Health behaviors of employed and insured adults in the United States, 2004–2005. Am J Health Promot. 2010;24:315–323.
23.
LinnanLABirkenBE. Small businesses, worksite wellness, and public health: A time for action. N C Med J.2006;67:433–437.
24.
ThompsonBHannonPABishopSK. Factors related to participatory employee advisory boards in small, blue-collar worksites. Am J Health Promot. 2005;19:430–437.
25.
BarbeauEMHartmanCQuinnMM. Methods for recruiting white, black, and Hispanic working-class women and men to a study of physical and social hazards at work: The United for Health study. Int J Health Serv.2007;37:127–144.
26.
LassenABruselius-JensenMSommerHM. Factors influencing participation rates and employees' attitudes toward promoting healthy eating at blue-collar worksites. Health Educ Res.2007;22:727–736.
27.
SorensenGBarbeauEStoddardAM. Promoting behavior change among working-class, multiethnic workers: Results of the healthy directions—small business study. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:1389–1395.
28.
ClaxtonGDiJulioBWhitmoreH. Health benefits in 2010: Premiums rise modestly, workers pay more toward coverage. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:1942–1950.
29.
GabelJRWhitmoreHPickreignJ. Obesity and the workplace: Current programs and attitudes among employers and employees. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28:46–56.
30.
HughesMCPatrickDLHannonPA. Understanding the decision-making process for health promotion programming at small to midsized businesses. Health Promot Pract.2011;12:512–521.
31.
TongASainsburyPCraigJ. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–357.
PhippsEMadisonNPomerantzSCKleinMG. Identifying and assessing interests and concerns of priority populations for work-site programs to promote physical activity. Health Promot Pract.2010;11:71–78.
34.
HuntMKStoddardAMKaphingstKASorensenG. Characteristics of participants in a cancer prevention intervention designed for multiethnic workers in small manufacturing worksites. Am J Health Promot. 2007;22:33–37.
35.
GreenBBCheadleAPellegriniASHarrisJR. Active for Life: A work-based physical activity program. Prev Chronic Dis.2007;4:A63.
