Support for Physical Activity Policies and Perceptions of Work and Neighborhood Environments: Variance by BMI and Activity Status at the County and Individual Levels
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2014
Support for Physical Activity Policies and Perceptions of Work and Neighborhood Environments: Variance by BMI and Activity Status at the County and Individual Levels
To examine support for local policies encouraging physical activity and perceived neighborhood environment characteristics by physical activity and weight status of respondents across U.S. counties.
Design.
We used a random-digit-dial, computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) to conduct a cross-sectional telephone questionnaire in selected U.S. counties in 2011.
Setting.
Counties with high prevalences of obesity and sedentary behavior (HH; n = 884) and counties with low prevalences of obesity and sedentary behavior (LL; n = 171) were selected nationally.
Subjects.
Adult respondents from HH (n = 642) and LL (n = 566) counties.
Measures.
Questions were asked of respondents, pertaining to support for physical activity policies in various settings, neighborhood features, time spent in physical activity and sedentary behaviors, self-reported weight and height, and personal demographic information.
Analysis.
Means and frequencies were calculated; bivariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression models, developed. Models were adjusted for individual characteristics and county HH/LL status.
Results.
Respondents in LL counties perceived their neighborhood and work environments to be more supportive of healthy behaviors and were more supportive of local physical activity policies than respondents in HH counties (p < .001 for all). Positive neighborhood environment perceptions were related to reduced body mass index, increased physical activity, and decreased sedentary behavior.
Conclusion.
Policy support and neighborhood environments are associated with behaviors. Results can inform targeting policy agendas to facilitate the improvement of environments (community, work, and school) to be more supportive of physical activity.
FlegalKMCarrollMDKitBKOgdenCL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA. 2012;307:491–497.
2.
NejatEJPolotskyAJPalL. Predictors of chronic disease at midlife and beyond—the health risks of obesity. Maturitas. 2010;65:106–111.
3.
Ballard-BarbashRBerriganDPotischmanNDowlingE. Obesity and cancer epidemiology. In: BergerN, ed. Cancer and Energy Balance, Epidemiology and Overview. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag New York, LLC; 2010.
4.
AndersonGHorvathJ. The growing burden of chronic disease in America. Public Health Rep.2004;119:263–270.
5.
BodenheimerTChenEBennettHD. Confronting the growing burden of chronic disease: Can the US health care workforce do the job?Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28:64–74.
6.
MensahGAMokdadAHFordES. State of disparities in cardiovascular health in the United States. Circulation. 2005;111:1233–1241.
7.
CasperMNwaiseICroftJB. Geographic disparities in heart failure hospitalization rates among Medicare beneficiaries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:294–299.
8.
GreerSNwaiseICasperM. Atlas of Heart Disease Hospitalizations Among Medicare Beneficiaries. Atlanta, Ga: US Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010.
9.
RemingtonPLBooskeBC. Measuring the health of communities—how and why?J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011;17:397–400.
10.
ZickCDSmithKRFanJX. Running to the store: The relationship between neighborhood environments and the risk of obesity. Soc Sci Med.2009;69:1493–1500.
11.
CumminsSStaffordMMacintyreS. Neighbourhood environment and its association with self rated health: Evidence from Scotland and England. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:207–213.
12.
BurdetteAMNeedhamBL. Neighborhood environment and body mass index trajectories from adolescence to adulthood. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50:30–37.
13.
MujahidMSRouxDiez AVShenM. Relation between neighborhood environments and obesity in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:1349–1357.
14.
McCormackGGiles-CortiBLangeA. An update of recent evidence of the relationship between objective and self-report measures of the physical environment and physical activity behaviours. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7(1 suppl):81–92.
15.
BoslaughSELukeDABrownsonRC. Perceptions of neighborhood environment for physical activity: Is it “who you are” or “where you live”?J Urban Health. 2004;81:671–681.
16.
DuncanMJSpenceJCMummeryWK. Perceived environment and physical activity: A meta-analysis of selected environmental characteristics. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2005;2:11.
17.
AddyCLWilsonDKKirtlandKA. Associations of perceived social and physical environmental supports with physical activity and walking behavior. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:440–443.
18.
BrownsonRCBakerEAHousemannRA. Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1995–2003.
19.
KahnEBRamseyLTBrownsonRC. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med.2002;22(4suppl 1):73–107.
20.
LucoveJCHustonSLEvensonKR. Workers' perceptions about worksite policies and environments and their association with leisure-time physical activity. Am J Health Promot. 2007;21:196–200.
21.
BrownsonRCKellyCMEylerAA. Environmental and policy approaches for promoting physical activity in the United States: A research agenda. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5:488–503.
22.
EylerABrownsonRSchmidTPrattM. Understanding policies and physical activity: Frontiers of knowledge to improve population health. J Phys Act Health. 2010;(7suppl 1):S9–S12.
23.
BrownsonRCChriquiJFStamatakisKA. Understanding evidence-based public health policy. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:1576–1583.
24.
HeathGWBrownsonRCKrugerJ. The effectiveness of urban design and land use and transport policies and practices to increase physical activity: A systematic review. J Phys Act Health. 2006;3(suppl 1):S55–S76.
25.
SallisJFGlanzK. Physical activity and food environments: Solutions to the obesity epidemic. Milbank Q.2009;87:123–154.
26.
BrownsonRCHaire-JoshuDLukeDA. Shaping the context of health: A review of environmental and policy approaches in the prevention of chronic diseases. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:341–370.
27.
SallisJFCerveroRBAscherW. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297–322.
28.
KershRMoroneJ. How the personal becomes political: Prohibitions, public health, and obesity. Stud Am Polit Dev.2002;16:162–175.
29.
EconomosCDBrownsonRCDeAngelisMA. What lessons have been learned from other attempts to guide social change?Nutr Rev.2001;59(3):S40–S56.
30.
DodsonEAStamatakisKAChalifourS. State legislators' work on public health-related issues: What influences priorities?J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013;19:25–29.
31.
KoplanJPLivermanCTKraakVI; Institute of Medicine Committee on Prevention of Obesity in Children and Youth. Preventing Childhood Obesity: Health in the Balance. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005.
32.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guide to Community Preventive Services. Increasing physical activity: Environmental and policy approaches. 2010. Available at: www.thecommunityguide.org/pa/environmental-policy/index.html. Accessed April 9, 2013.
33.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes Interactive Atlases Web site. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/atlas/. Accessed April 7, 2013.
34.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, Ga: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2004–2009.
35.
US Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program. Available at: http://www.census.gov/popest/. Accessed April 4, 2013.
36.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Operational and User's Guide, Version 3.0. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/pdf/userguide.pdf. Accessed April 7, 2013.
37.
BrownsonRCSchmidTLKingAC. Support for policy interventions to increase physical activity in rural Missouri. Am J Health Promot. 1998;12:263–266.
38.
CarrollDD. The mode less traveled: Using active transportation to increase physical activity. Presentated at: American College of Sports Medicine 58th Annual Meeting and 2nd World Congress on Exercise is Medicine; June 1, 2011; Denver, Colo.
39.
CerinESaelensBESallisJF. Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale: Validity and development of a short form. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:1682–1691.
40.
CortinaJM. What is coefficient alpha: An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78:98–104.
41.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire. Atlanta, Ga: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009.
42.
EvensonKRMcGinnAP. Test-retest reliability of adult surveillance measures for physical activity and inactivity. Am J Prev Med.2005;28:470–478.
43.
MerrillRMRichardsonJS. Validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2006. Prev Chronic Dis.2009;6:A121.
44.
US Department of Health and Human Services. 2008 physical activity guidelines for Americans. Available at: http://www.health.gov/paguidelines/. Accessed April 7, 2013.
45.
SallisJFGlanzK. The role of built environments in physical activity, eating, and obesity in childhood. Future Child. 2006;16:89–108.
46.
EvansWDFinkelsteinEAKarnerowDBRenaudJM. Public perceptions of childhood obesity. Am J Prev Med.2005;28:26–32.
47.
OliverJELeeT. Public opinion and the politics of obesity in America. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005;30:923–954.
48.
MorainSMelloMM. Survey finds public support for legal interventions directed at health behavior to fight noncommunicable disease. Health Aff.2013;32:486–496.
49.
GustatJHealyILittJ. Lessons in promoting active living: The collaborative perspective. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013;19(3):S58–S64.
50.
KraftMKLeeJJBrennanLK. Active living by design sustainability strategies. Am J Prev Med.2012;43(5suppl 4):S329–S336.
51.
BallKBaumanALeslieEOwenN. Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. Prev Med.2001;33:434–440.
52.
BrownBBWernerCMAmburgeyJWSzalayC. Walkable route perceptions and physical features: Converging evidence for en route walking experiences. Environ Behav. 2007;39:34–61.
53.
HaleJKnappCBardwellL. Connecting food environments and health through the relational nature of aesthetics: Gaining insight through the community gardening experience. Soc Sci Med.2011;72:1853–1863.
54.
CerinELeslieEOwenN. Explaining socio-economic status differences in walking for transport: An ecological analysis of individual, social and environmental factors. Soc Sci Med.2009;68:1013–1020.
55.
ArnbergerAEderR. The influence of green space on community attachment of urban and suburban residents. Urban Forestry Urban Greening. 2012;11:41–49.
56.
RichardSKatieHWalkerP. Characteristics of urban sidewalks/streets and objectively measured physical activity. J Urban Health. 2008;85:178–190.
57.
CarlsonSAGuideRSchmidTL. Public support for street-scale urban design practices and policies to increase physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2011;(8suppl 1):S125–S134.
58.
Gordon-LarsenPNelsonMCPagePPopkinBM. Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity. Pediatrics. 2006;117:417–424.
59.
BlumbergSJLukeJVCynamonML. Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: Evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:926–931.
60.
McGinnAPEvensonKRHerringAH. The association of perceived and objectively measured crime with physical activity: A cross-sectional analysis. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5:117–131.
61.
EvensonKRBlockRRouxDiez AV. Associations of adult physical activity with perceived safety and police-recorded crime: The Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:146–146.
62.
AinsworthBECaspersenCJMatthewsCE. Recommendations to improve the accuracy of estimates of physical activity derived from self report. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(suppl 1):S76–S84.
63.
ShephardRJ. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. Br J Sports Med.2003;37:197–206.
64.
PrinceSAAdamoKBHamelME. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: A systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:56.
