Associations between Natural Amenities,Physical Activity,and Body Mass Index in 100 North Carolina Counties

Abstract

Purpose.

To examine associations between county-level natural amenities, physical activity (PA), and body mass index (BMI).

Design and Setting.

Cross-sectional study among 100 North Carolina counties.

Measures.

We obtained percentage of county residents meeting PA criteria and county-wide means for reported height and weight from the North Carolina Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, combining years 2003, 2005, and 2007. The county natural amenities scale was the independent variable. Potential county-level covariates were percentage rural, percentage black, median age, and median household income (Census 2000).

Analysis.

We conducted weighted bivariate and linear regression analyses to examine relationships between natural amenities, aggregate PA, and aggregate BMI.

Results.

BMI and natural amenities were negatively associated (parameter estimate = –.13 (.06), p = .03). When percentage meeting PA criteria was included, the parameter estimate attenuated 15%.

Conclusion.

There was an inverse relationship between natural amenities and BMI, partially mediated by PA.

Keywords

Environment Physical Activity Obesity Prevention Research Manuscript format: research brief Research purpose: modeling/relationship testing Study design: cross-sectional/ecologic Outcome measure: behavioral,biometric Setting: clinical/health care,local community,state Health focus: physical activity,weight control Strategy: built environment Target population age: adults Target population circumstances: income level,geographic location,race/ethnicity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Patterson

Moore

Probst

Shinogle

. Obesity and physical inactivity in rural America. J Rural Health. 2004;20:151–159.

Boehmer

Lovegreen

Haire-Joshu

Brownson

. What constitutes an obesogenic environment in rural communities? Am J Health Promot. 2006; 20:411–421.

Martin

Kirkner

Mayo

Urban, rural, and regional variations in physical activity. J Rural Health. 2005;21:239–244.

Jilcott

Evenson

Laraia

Ammerman

. Association between physical activity and proximity to physical activity resources among low-income, midlife women. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007;4:A04.

Moore

Davis

Baxter

Physical activity, metabolic syndrome, and overweight in rural youth. J Rural Health. 2008;24:136–142.

Maas

Verheij

Spreeuwenberg

Groenewegen

. Physical activity as a possible mechanism behind the relationship between green space and health: a multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:206.

Lin

Spann

Hyman

Pavlik

. Climate amenity and BMI [erratum appears in Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15:2520]. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15:2120–2127.

McGinn

Evenson

Herring

Huston

. The relationship between leisure, walking, and transportation activity with the natural environment. Health Place. 2007;13:588–602.

Witten

Hiscock

Pearce

Blakely

. Neighbourhood access to open spaces and the physical activity of residents: a national study. Prev Med. 2008;47:299–303.

10.

Brownson

Hoehner

Day

Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(4 suppl):S99–S123.e12.

11.

McGranahan

. Landscape influence on recent rural migration in the U.S. Landscape Urban Plann. 2008;85:228–240.

12.

McGranahan

Natural Amenities Drive Rural Population Change. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture; 1999.