Integrating Research,Legal Technical Assistance,and Advocacy to Inform Shared Use Legislation in Mississippi

Abstract

Purpose.

The purpose of this article was to describe the process by which research findings informed the successful passage of legislation designed to increase opportunities for physical activity in Mississippi, and discuss implications and lessons learned from this process.

Design and Setting.

The article is descriptive and conceptual, and addresses the collaborative process by which research, legal technical assistance, and advocacy informed and shaped shared use legislation in Mississippi.

Subjects.

Collaborators informing this article were an Active Living Research grantee, a staff attorney with the Public Health Law Center, the American Heart Association Mississippi Government Relations Director, and community partners.

Results.

The American Heart Association and Public Health Law Center developed policy guidance in the form of sample language for legislation as a starting point for states in determining policy needed to eliminate or reduce barriers to the shared use of school recreational facilities. The policy guidance was informed by evidence from Active Living Research–funded research studies. The American Heart Association, supporting a bill shaped by the policy guidance, led the effort to advocate for successful shared use legislation in Mississippi.

Conclusion.

Research should be policy relevant and properly translated and disseminated. Legal technical assistance should involve collaboration with both researchers and advocates so that policymakers have the information to make evidence-based decisions. Government relations directors should collaborate with legal technical staff to obtain and understand policy guidance relevant to their advocacy efforts. Effective collaborations, with an evidence-based approach, can lead to informed, successful policy change.

Keywords

Mississippi Shared Use Legislation Schools Policy Collaboration Prevention Research Manuscript format: research brief Research purpose: descriptive Study design: nonexperimental Outcome measure: other Setting: state/national Health focus: fitness/physical activity Strategy: policy Target population age: youth,adults Target population circumstances: geographic location

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Durant

Harris

Doyle

. Relation of school environment and policy to adolescent physical activity. J Sch Health. 2009;79(4):153–159.

Farley

Meriwether

Baker

. Safe play spaces to promote physical activity in inner-city children: Results from a pilot study of an environmental intervention. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(9):1625–1631.

Spengler

Connaughton

Maddock

. Liability concerns and shared use of school recreational facilities in underserved communities. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(4):415–420.

Spengler

Carroll

Connaughton

Evenson

. Policies to promote physical activity on school grounds: A review of state recreational user statutes. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(1):81–88.

Public Health Law Center : Eliminating barriers for community recreational use of school property: Policy guidance on liability and shared use. Available at: http://publichealthlawcenter.org/sites/default/files/resources/phlc-fs-shareduse-samplestatute-language-2012. Published January 23, 2012. Accessed January 23, 2013.

Evenson

McGinn

. Availability of school physical activity facilities to the public in four US communities. Am J Health Promot. 2004;18(3):243–250.

Spengler

Connaughton

. Scale development: Perceived barriers to public use of school recreational facilities. Am J Health Behav. 2012;36(3):311–331.

Cox

Berends

Sallis

. Engaging school governance leaders to influence physical activity policies. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(suppl 1):S40–S48.

Spengler

Young

Linton

. Schools as a community resource for physical activity: Legal considerations for decision makers. Am J Health Promot. 2006;21:390–396.

10.

Evenson

Wen

Lee

. National study of changes in prevalence and community access to school physical activity facilities: The School Health Policies and Programs Study. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7:S20–S30.

11.

Spengler

. Promoting physical activity through the shared use of school and community recreational resources: A research brief. Princeton, NJ: Active Living Research, a National Program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. 2012. Available at: http://www.activelivingresearch.org/shareduse. Accessed January 11, 2013.

12.

Maddock

Choy

McGurk

. Increasing safe places for physical activity through a joint use agreement: A case study in urban Honolulu. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008;5(3):1–8.

13.

Mississippi House Bill No. 540. School property and facilities; authorize shared use agreements for public recreation and sports. 2012. Available at: https://law.resource.org/pub/us/code/ms/ms.scan.2012/gov.law.ms.code.10a.s.2012.pdf. Accessed September 3, 2013.