This study evaluated the policy and built and recreation environmental supports for physical activity on 13 university campuses.
Design.
Environmental audit survey.
Setting.
Thirteen U.S. universities, 2009.
Subjects.
University policies, recreation programs and facilities, and at least five additional buildings per campus.
Measures.
The Physical Activity Campus Environmental Supports Audit was developed for this study.
Analysis.
Analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey's B and χ2 assessed differences by institution and building type.
Results.
The mean obesogenic policy score was significantly lower than the desired score, ≥ 7 (p = .002), with only one campus scoring 10. The mean built environment audit score (5.4 ± 1.7) was low, with significant differences between institutions (p < .001) and only three campuses scoring above the desired score, ≥ 7. Although generally stairwells were clean and well lighted, there was a lack of signage to encourage stair use (p < .001). Overall, recreation programs (7.1 ± .7) and facilities (7.1 ± 1.2) scored well, but amenities scores were lower for satellite (2.8 ± 1.6) versus main (4.1 ± 1.8) recreation facilities (p = .04).
Conclusion.
On these 13 university campuses, recreation programs and facilities were supportive of healthful lifestyles for obesity prevention, but policies and the built environment were not. This physical activity environmental audit survey requires testing in a wider sample of postsecondary institutions to corroborate its utility and provide evidence to support initiatives to improve campus environments for physical activity.
OgdenCCCarrollMDKitBFlegalK. Prevalence of obesity in the United States 2009–2010. National Center for Health Statistics; 2012. No. 82. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db82.pdf. Accessed May 25, 2012.
2.
FinkelsteinEFiebelkornIWangG. National medical spending attributable to overweight and obesity: How much, and who's paying?Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;W3:219–226.
3.
FinkelsteinEATrogdonJCohenJDietzW. Annual medical spending attributable to obesity: Payer- and service-specific estimates. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28:W822–W831.
4.
McTigueKMGarrettJMPopkinBM. The natural history of the development of obesity in a cohort of young US adults between 1981 and 1998. Ann Intern Med.2002;136:857–864.
5.
RacetteSBDeusingerSSStrubeMJ. Weight changes, exercise, and dietary patterns during freshman and sophomore years of college. J Am Coll Health. 2005;53:245–251.
6.
AdamsTRiniA. Predicting 1-year change in body mass index among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2007;55:361–366.
7.
Vella-ZarbRAElgarFJ. The “freshman 15”: A meta-analysis of weight gain in the freshman year of college. J Am Coll Health. 2009;58:161–166.
8.
LewisCEJacobsDRJrMcCreathH. Weight gain continues in the 1990s: 10-year trends in weight and overweight from the CARDIA study. Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:1172–1181.
9.
BurkeGLBildDEHilnerJE. Differences in weight gain in relation to race, gender, age and education in young adults: The CARDIA study. Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults. Ethn Health. 1996;1:327–335.
10.
NelsonMStoryMLarsonM. Emerging adulthood and college-aged youth: An overlooked age for weight-related behavior change. Obesity. 2008;16:2205–2211.
11.
LewisCESmithDEWallaceDD. Seven-year trends in body weight and associations with lifestyle and behavioral characteristics in black and white young adults: The CARDIA study. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:635–642.
12.
MorrellJLofgrenIBurkeJReillyR. Metabolic syndrome, obesity, and related risk factors among college men and women. J Am Coll Health. 2012;60:82–89.
13.
MattssonNRönnemaaTJuonalaM. The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in young adults. The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. J Intern Med.2007;261:159–169.
14.
FerreiraITwiskJWRvan MechelenW. Development of fatness, fitness, and lifestyle from adolescence to the age of 36 years: Determinants of the metabolic syndrome in young adults: The Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study. Arch Intern Med.2005;165:42–48.
15.
CookADaponteB. A demographic analysis of the rise in prevalence of the US population overweight and/or obese. Popul Res Policy Rev.2008;27:403–426.
16.
BurkeJDReillyRAMorrellJSLofgrenIE. The University of New Hampshire's young adult health risk screening initiative. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:1751–1758.
17.
StrongKAParksSLAndersonE. Weight gain prevention: Identifying theory-based targets for health behavior change in young adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:1708–1715.
18.
LacailleLDaunerKKrambeerRPedersonJ. Psychosocial and environmental determinants of eating behaviors, physical activity, and weight change among college students: A qualitative analysis. J Am Coll Health. 2011;59:531–538
19.
BurwellCDewaldLGrizzellJ. Healthy Campus 2010: Midcourse review. Am J Health Stud.2010;25:102–110.
20.
GreeneGWSchembreSMWhiteAA. Identifying clusters of college students at elevated health risk based on eating and exercise behaviors and psychosocial determinants of body weight. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:394–400.
21.
SternfeldBSidneySJacobsDR. Seven-year changes in physical fitness, physical activity, and lipid profile in the CARDIA study. Ann Epidemiol. 1999;9:25–33.
22.
MeckelYGalilyYNemetDEliakimA. Changes in weight indexes and aerobic fitness of physical education students over three years of college. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2011;6:112–121.
23.
ArnettJJ. Conceptions of the transition to adulthood: Perspectives from adolescence through midlife. J Adult Dev.2001;8:133–143.
24.
ArnettJJ. Young people's conception of the transition to adulthood. Youth Soc.1997;29:3–23.
25.
GuoSWuWChumleaWRocheA. Predicting overweight and obesity in adulthood from body mass index values in childhood and adolescence. Am J Clin Nutr.2002;76:653–658.
26.
BrownTAvenellAEdmundsL. Systematic review of long-term lifestyle interventions to prevent weight gain and morbidity in adults. Obes Rev.2009;10:627–638.
27.
HardemanWGriffinSJohnstonM. Interventions to prevent weight gain: A systematic review of psychological models and behaviour change methods. J Int Assoc Obes.2000;24:131–143.
28.
WuTGaoXChenMVan DamRM. Long-term effectiveness of diet-plus-exercise interventions vs. diet-only interventions for weight loss: A meta-analysis. Obes Rev.2009;10:313–323.
29.
Gokee-LaRoseJGorinARaynorH. Are standard behavioral weight loss programs effective for young adults?Int J Obes.2009;33:1374–1380.
30.
PoobalanAAucottLPreciousE. Weight loss interventions in young people (18 to 25 year olds): A systematic review. Obes Rev.2010;11:580–592.
31.
GreenLKreuterM. Health Program Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
32.
FrenchSALinB-HGuthrieJF. National trends in soft drink consumption among children and adolescents age 6 to 17 years: Prevalence, amounts, and sources, 1977/1978 to 1994/1998. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:1326–1331.
33.
FrenchSAStoryMJefferyRW. Environmental influences on eating and physical activity. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:309–335.
34.
HillJO. Genetic and environmental contributions to obesity. Am J Clin Nutr.1998;68:991–992.
35.
GolanMCrowS. Parents are key players in the prevention and treatment of weight-related problems. Nutr Rev.2004;62:39–50.
36.
HillJWyattHPetersJ. Obesity and the environment: Where do we go from here?Science. 2003;203:853–856
37.
DayPLPearceJ. Obesity-promoting food environments and the spatial clustering of food outlets around schools. Am J Prev Med.2011;40:113–121.
38.
BrocklehurstNAllanH. The health environment: A definition and conceptual framework for research and practice. J Nurs Times Res.1998;3:215–225.
39.
HoebbelCGolaszewskiTSwansonMDornJ. Associations between the worksite environment and perceived health culture. Am J Health Promot. 2012;26:301–304.
40.
GiskesKvan LentheFAvendano-PabonMBrugJ. A systematic review of environmental factors and obesogenic dietary intakes among adults: Are we getting closer to understanding obesogenic environments?Obes Rev.2011;12:e95–e106.
41.
DingDGenelK. Built environment, physical activity, and obesity: What have we learned from reviewing the literature?Health Place. 2011;18:100–105.
42.
KapinosKYakushevaO. Environmental influences on young adult weight gain: Evidence from a natural experiment. J Adolesc Health. 2011;48:52–58.
43.
LakeATownshendTAlvanidesS. Diet, physical activity, sedentary behaviour and perceptions of the environment in young adults. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2009;22:444–454.
44.
GreaneyMLessFWhiteA. College students' barriers and enablers for healthful weight management: A qualitative study. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009;41:281–286.
45.
ReedJAinsworthB. Perceptions of environmental supports on the physical activity behaviors of university men and women: A preliminary investigation. J Am Coll Health. 2007;56:199–204.
46.
ReedJAPhillipsDA. Relationships between physical activity and the proximity of exercise facilities and home exercise equipment used by undergraduate university students. J Am Coll Health. 2005;53:285–290.
47.
Degree-granting institutions, by control and type of institution: Selected years, 1949–50 through 2009–10. Institute of Educational Statistics, National Center for Education Statistics. Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/tables/dt10_275.asp. Accessed June 22, 2012.
48.
Enrollment, staff, and degrees conferred in postsecondary institutions participating in Title IV programs, by type and control of institution, sex of student, type of staff, and type of degree: Fall 2008, fall 2009, and 2008–09. Institute of Education Statistics, National Center for Education Statistics. Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/tables/dt10_195.asp. Accessed June 22, 2012.
FosterCHillsonM. Changing the environment to promote health-enhancing physical activity. J Sports Sci.2004;23:755–769.
51.
GlanzK. Measuring food environments: A historical perspective. Am J Prev Med.2009;36(S4):S93–S98.
52.
ZapkaJLemonSCEstabrookBBJolicoeurDG. Keeping a Step Ahead: Formative phase of a workplace intervention trial to prevent obesity. Obesity. 2007;15(suppl 1):27S–36S.
53.
StatenRRMillerKNolandPowers MRayensMJ. College students' physical activity: Application of an ecological perspective. Am J Health Stud.2005;20:58–65.
54.
HoracekTWhiteAGreeneG. Sneakers and spokes: An assessment of the walk-ability and bike-ability of U.S. postsecondary institutions. J Environ Health. 2012;74:8–15.
55.
HoracekTByrd-BredbennerCCareyG. Assessment of the dining environment on and near the campuses of 15 post-secondary institutions. Public Health Nutr.2013;16:1186–1196.
56.
HoracekTErdmanMReznarM. Evaluation of the food store environment on and near the campus of 15 post-secondary institutions. Am J Health Promot. 2013;27:e81–e90.
57.
Byrd-BredbennerCJohnsonMQuickVM. Sweet and salty. An assessment of the snacks and beverages sold in vending machines on US post-secondary institution campuses. Appetite. 2012;58:1143–1151.
58.
OldenburgBSallisJHarrisDOwenN. Checklist of Health Promotion Environments at Worksites (CHEW): Development and measurement characteristics. Am J Health Promot. 2002;16:288–299.
59.
DeJoyDMWilsonMGGoetzelRZ. Development of the Environmental Assessment Tool (EAT) to measure organizational physical and social support for worksite obesity prevention programs. J Occup Environ Med.2008;50:126–137.
60.
EvensonKRBlockRRouxDiez AV. Associations of adult physical activity with perceived safety and police-recorded crime: The Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:146. Available at: http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/9/1/146. Accessed December 1, 2012
EllisRAMooreRREllisRA. Learning through benchmarking: Developing a relational, prospective approach to benchmarking information and communication technologies (ICT) in learning and teaching. High Educ.2006;51:351–371.
64.
ButlerSMBlackDRBlueCLGretebeckRJ. Change in diet, physical activity, and body weight in female college freshman. Am J Health Behav. 2004;28:24–32.
65.
HodgeCJacksonLSullivanL. The “freshman 15” facts and fantasies about weight gain in college women. Psych Women Q.1993;17:119–126.
66.
KeatingXDGuanJPineroJCBridgesDM. A meta-analysis of college students' physical activity behaviors. J Am Coll Health. 2005;54:116–125.
67.
BrownsonRCHaire-JoshuDLukeDA. Shaping the context of health: A review of environmental and policy approaches in the prevention of chronic diseases. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:341–370.
68.
BrownsonRCKellyCMEylerAA. Environmental and policy approaches for promoting physical activity in the United States: A research agenda. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5:488–503.
69.
RenaldsASmithTHHalePJ. A systematic review of built environment and health. Fam Community Health. 2010;33:68–78.
70.
CooperNTheriaultD. Environmental correlates of physical activity: Implications for campus recreation practitioners. Recreational Sports J.2008;32:97–105.
71.
StrandBNEgebergJMozumdarA. The prevalence and characteristics of wellness programs and centers at two-year and four-year colleges and universities. Recreational Sports J.2010;34:45–57.
72.
JeterA. Evaluation of recreational sports programs and facilities at Texas A & M University. Recreational Sports J.1978;2:51–54
73.
KoYPastoreDL. An instrument to assess customer perceptions of service quality and satisfaction in campus recreation programs. Recreational Sports J.2007;31:34–42.
74.
TsigilisNMasmanidisTLousteliosA. University students' satisfaction and effectiveness of campus recreation programs. Recreational Sports J.2009;33:65–77.
75.
OsmanRWColeSTVessellR. Examining the role of perceived service quality in predicting user satisfaction and behavioral intentions in a campus recreation setting. Recreational Sports J.2006;30:20–29.
76.
CochraneTDaveyRC. Increasing update of physical activity: A social ecological approach. J R Soc Prom Health. 2008;128:31–40.
77.
KaczynskiAT. Neighborhood walk-ability perceptions: Associations with amount of neighborhood-based physical activity by intensity and purposeJ Phys Act Health2010;7:3–10.
78.
OwenNDe De BourdeaudhuijISugiyamaT. Bicycle use for transport in an Australian and a Belgian city: Associations with built-environment attributes. J Urban Health. 2010;87:189–198.
79.
BeresfordSABishopSKBrunnerNL. Environmental assessment at worksites after a multilevel intervention to promote activity and changes in eating: The PACE project. J Occup Environ Med.2010;52(suppl 1):S22–S28.
80.
BoutelleKNJefferyRWMurrayDMSchmitzMK. Using signs, artwork, and music to promote stair use in a public building. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:2004–2006.
81.
BungumTMeachamMTruaxN. The effects of signage and the physical environment on stair usage. J Phys Act Health. 2007;4:237–244.
82.
van Nieuw-AmerongenMEKremersSPJde VriesNKKokG. The use of prompts, increased accessibility, visibility and aesthetics of the stairwell to promote stair use in a university building. Environ Behav. 2011;43:131–139.
83.
NicollGZimringC. Effect of innovative building design on physical activity. J Public Health Policy. 2009;30(S1):S111–S123.
84.
GrimstvedtKerrJOswaltSFogtD. Using signage to promote stair use on a university campus in hidden and visible stairwells. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7:232–238.
85.
EvesFFWebbOJGriffinCChambersJ. A multi-component stair climbing promotional campaign targeting calorific expenditure for worksites; a quasi-experimental study testing effects on behaviour, attitude and intention. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:423–433485.
86.
SolerRELeeksKDBuchananLR. Point-of-decision prompts to increase stair use: A systematic review update. Am J Prev Med.2010;38(S2):S292–S300.
87.
LewisAEvesF. Prompt before the choice is made: Effects of a stair-climbing intervention in university buildings. Br J Health Psychol. 2012;17:631–643.
88.
HensleyLD. Current status of basic instruction programs in physical education at American colleges and universities. J Phys Educ Recreation Dance. 2000;71:30–36.
89.
CardinalBJSorensenSDCardinalMK. Historical perspective and current status of the physical education graduation requirement at American 4-year colleges and universities. Res Q Exerc Sport. 201212;83:503–512.
90.
Haire-JoshuDElliottMSchermbeckR. Surveillance of obesity-related policies in multiple environments: The Missouri Obesity, Nutrition, and Activity Policy Database, 2007–2009. Prev Chronic Dis.2010;7:A80. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2010/jul/09_0161.htm. Accessed December 13, 2012.
91.
BlumWhatley JEBeaudoinCMO'BrienLM. Impact of Maine's statewide nutrition policy on high school food environments. Prev Chronic Dis.2011;8:A19. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2011/jan/09_0241.htm. Accessed December 12, 2012.
92.
American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Policy on vending machines in schools. Pediatr Dent.2009;30:49–50.
93.
BoehmerTKLukeDAHaire-JoshuDL. Preventing childhood obesity through state policy. Predictors of bill enactment. Am J Prev Med.2008;34:333–340.
94.
KampfS. Impact of college recreational centers on enrollment. Recreational Sports J.2010;34:78–94.
95.
HaderleiBM. Influence of campus recreation programs and facilities on student recruitment and retention. Recreation Sports J.198711:24–27.
96.
LindseyRSessomsE. Assessment of a campus recreation program on student recruitment, retention, and frequency of participation across certain demographic variables. Recreational Sports J.2006;30:30–39.
97.
LeeREBoothKMReese-SmithJY. The Physical Activity Resource Assessment (PARA) instrument: Evaluating features, amenities and incivilities of physical activity resources in urban neighborhoods. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2005;2:13. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-2-13.
98.
ParkerKDeJoyDWilsonM. Application of the Environmental Assessment Tool (EAT) as a process measure for a worksite weight management intervention. J Occup Environ Med.2010;52(1S):42–51.
99.
NiggCAlbrightCWilliamsR. Are physical activity and nutrition indicators of the checklist of health promotion environments at worksites (CHEW) associated with employee obesity among hotel workers?J Occup Environ Med.2010;52:S4–S7.
100.
Online home of the Designing Healthy Environments at Work (DHEW) Assessment Tool. Michigan Healthy Communities Collaborative; 2012. Available at: http://mihealthtools.org/work/. Accessed June 27, 2012.
GolaszewskiTFisherB. Heart check: The development and evolution of an organizational heart health assessment. Am J Health Promot. 2002;17:132–153.
103.
ShimotsuSTFrenchSAGerlachAFHannanPJ. Worksite environment physical activity and healthy food choices: Measurement of the worksite food and physical activity environment at four metropolitan bus garages. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007;4:17. doi:10.1186/1479.
104.
HainesDJ. The campus recreation assessment model. Recreational Sports J.2010;34:130–137.
105.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The CDC Worksite Health ScoreCard: An Assessment Tool for Employers to Prevent Heart Disease, Stroke, and Related Health Conditions. Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2012. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/pubs/worksite_scorecard.htm. Accessed August 15, 2012.
106.
FieldingJEBrissPA. Promoting evidence-based public health policy: Can we have better evidence and more action?Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25:969–978.
107.
OrmeJDoorisM. Integrating health and sustainability: The higher education sector as a timely catalyst. Health Educ Res.2010;25:425–437.
108.
BrissetteIFisherBSpicerDAKingL. Worksite characteristics and environmental and policy supports for cardiovascular disease prevention in New York state. Prev Chron Dis.2008;5:A37. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2008/apr/07_0196.htm. Accessed August 20, 2010.
109.
KremersSde BruiknG-JVisscherT. Environmental influences on energy balance-related behaviors: A dual-process view. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006;3:9–19XX–XX. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-3-9.
110.
McCormackGShiellA. In search of causality: A systematic review of the relationship between the built environment and physical activity among adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:125. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-125.
