To examine behavioral patterns and sociodemographic predictors of diet, inactivity, and tobacco use among a diverse sample of residents from low-income housing developments.
Design.
In this cross-sectional survey study, households and residents were randomly selected using multistage cluster sampling.
Setting.
The study was conducted in 20 low-income housing developments in the Boston, Massachusetts, metropolitan area.
Subjects.
Subjects were 828 residents who completed the survey (response rate = 49.3%). Forty-one percent of participants were Hispanic and 38% were non-Hispanic Black.
Measures.
Outcomes measured were diet, inactivity, and tobacco use. Predictors measured were age, race/ethnicity, gender, education, country in which the subject was born, language spoken, and financial hardship.
Analysis.
Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the association of three health behaviors with sociodemographic factors.
Results.
Age, gender, language spoken, and financial hardship showed significant relationships with all three behaviors. For example, those who reported less financial hardship (odds ratio [OR] = 1.75) were more likely to eat healthier. Residents who spoke no English, or at least one language in addition to English, were significantly more likely to report healthier eating (OR = 2.78 and 3.30, respectively) than those who spoke English only. Men were significantly more likely to report less healthy eating (OR = 0.65) than were women. Similar trends emerged for inactivity and tobacco use.
Conclusion.
Effective health promotion interventions in low-income housing developments that leverage protective factors while addressing risk factors have the potential to reduce income-related health disparities in these concentrated resource-deprived neighborhoods.
ReevesRJRaffertyAP. Healthy lifestyle characteristics among adults in the United States, 2000. Arch Intern Med.2005;165:854–857.
3.
SiahpushMBorlandRScolloM. Smoking and financial stress. Tob Control. 2003;12:60–66.
4.
MarmotMShipleyMBrunnerEHemingwayH. Relative contribution of early life and adult socioeconomic factors to adult morbidity in the Whitehall II study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55:301–307.
5.
WongMDShapiroMFBoscardinWJEttnerSL. Contribution of major diseases to disparities in mortality. N Engl J Med.2002;347:585–1592.
6.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of fruit and vegetable consumption and physical activity by race/ethnicity—United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.2007;56:301–304.
7.
VandelanotteCReevesMMBrugJDe BourdeaudhuijI. A randomized trial of sequential and simultaneous multiple behavior change interventions for physical activity and fat intake. Prev Med.2008;46:232–237.
8.
HarleyADevineCBeardB. Multiple health behavior change in a cancer prevention intervention for construction laborers. Prev Chronic Dis.2010;7:A55.
9.
de VriesHvan't ReitJSpigtM. Clusters of lifestyle behaviors: Results from the Dutch SMILE study. Prev Med.2008;46:203–208.
10.
MorabiaAConstanzaMC. Piling up healthy behaviors. Prev Med.2012;55:161–162.
11.
WiggersJRadvanDCloverK. Public housing, public health: Health needs of public housing tenants. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25:111–114.
12.
AhluwaliaJSHollenNKaurH. Pathways to Health: Cluster-randomized trial to increase fruit and vegetable consumption among smokers in public housing. Health Psychol. 2007;26:214–221.
SheltonRCMcNeillLHPuleoE. The association between social factors and physical activity among low-income adults living in public housing. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:2102–2110.
15.
HeinrichKMLeeRESuminskiRR. Associations between the built environment and physical activity in public housing residents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007;4:56.
16.
BennettGGWolinKYPuleoEEmmonsKM. Pedometer-determined physical activity among multiethnic low-income housing residents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:768–773.
17.
ShankarSKlassenACGarrett-MayerE. Evaluation of a nutrition education intervention for women residents of Washington, DC, public housing communities. Health Educ Res.2007;22:425–437.
18.
KlassenACSmithKCBlackMMCaulfieldLE. Mixed method approaches to understanding cancer-related dietary risk reduction among public housing residents. J Urban Health. 2009;86:624–640.
19.
CrumpSRTaylorBDSungJFC. Dietary intake to reduce cancer risk among African American women in public housing: Do sociodemographic factors make a difference?Ethn Dis.2006;16:963–970.
20.
EugeniMLBaxterMScherezadeKM. Disconnections of African American public housing residents: Connections to physical activity, dietary habits and obesity. Am J Community Psychol. 2011;47:264–276.
21.
HeinrichKMLeeREReganGR. How does the built environment relate to body mass index and obesity prevalence among public housing residents?Am J Health Promot. 2008;22:187–194.
22.
BerriganDDoddKTroianoRP. Physical activity and acculturation among adult Hispanics in the United States. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2006;77:147–157.
23.
NeuhouserMLThompsonBCoronadoGSolomonCC. Higher fat intakes and lower fruit and vegetables intakes are associated with greater acculturation among Mexicans living in Washington State. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:51–57.
24.
KishJ. Survey Sampling. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1965.
25.
CarboneETCampbellMKHoness-MorrealeL. Use of cognitive interview techniques in the development of nutrition surveys and interactive nutrition messages for low-income populations. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:690–696.
26.
Rifas-ShimanSLWillettWCLobbR. PrimeScreen, a brief dietary screening tool: Reproducibility and comparability with both a longer food frequency questionnaire and biomarkers. Public Health Nutr.2001;4:249–254.
27.
ProchaskaJJVelicerWFNiggCRProchaskaJO. Methods of quantifying change in multiple risk factor interventions. Prev Med.2008;46:260–265.
28.
DrakeBFQuintilianiLMSappA. A comparison of strategies for assessing multiple health behavior change outcomes in behavioral intervention studies. Behav Med Pract Policy Res.2013;3(1):114–121.
29.
CraigCLMarshallALSjostromM. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381–1395.
CantorDCovellJDavisT. Health Information National Trends Survey 2005 (HINTS 2005) Final Report. Rockville, MD: Weststat; 2005. Available at: http://hints.cancer.gov/docs/HINTS_2005_Final_Report.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2012.
32.
JassoGMasseyDSRosenzweigMRSmithJP. The New Immigrant Survey in the US: The experience over time. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute; 2003. Available at: http://www.migrationinformation.org/Feature/display.cfm?ID=81. Accessed October 15, 2012.
33.
GuralnikJMFriedLPSimonsickEM. The Women's Health and Aging Study. 1995. Washington, DC: Dept. of Health and Human Services; 1995. NIH 95–4009.
34.
SchuitAJVan LoonAJMTijhuisMOckeMC. Clustering of lifestyle risk factors in a general adult population. Prev Med.2002;35:219–224.
35.
BlanckHMGillespieCKimmonsJE. Trends in fruit and vegetable consumption among US men and women, 1994–2005. Prev Chronic Dis.2008;5(2).
36.
HealyGNMatthewsCEDunstanDW. Sedentary time and cardio-metabolic biomarkers in US adults: NHANES 2003–06. Eur Heart J.2011;32:590–597.
37.
GelbKPedersonAGreavesL. How have health promotion frameworks considered gender?Health Promot Int.2011;27:445–452.
38.
LiangWShediac-RizkallahMCCelentanoDDRohdeC. A population-based study of age and gender differences in patterns of health-related behaviors. Am J Prev Med.1999;17:8–17.
39.
HassonHBrownCHassonD. Factors associated with high use of a workplace web-based stress management program in a randomized controlled intervention study. Health Educ Res.2010;25:596–607.
40.
JeanfreauSG. Is anyone promoting the health of men?Am J Mens Health. 2011;5:285.
41.
Tucker-SeeleyRDLiYSubramanianSVSorensenG. Financial hardship and mortality among older adults using the 1996–2004 Health and Retirement Study. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19:850–857.
42.
AhnquistJFredlundPWamalaSP. Is cumulative exposure to economic hardships more hazardous to women's health than men's? A 16-year follow-up study of the Swedish Survey of Living Conditions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:331–336.
43.
KahnJRPearlinLI. Financial strain over the life course and health among older adults. J Health Soc Behav. 2006;47:17–31.
44.
SiahpushMSpittalMSinghGK. Smoking cessation and financial stress. J Public Health. 2007;29:338–342.
45.
PerryB. The mismatch between income measures and direct outcome measures of poverty. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand. 2002;19:101–127.
46.
BeverlySG. Measures of material hardship: Rationale and recommendations. J Poverty. 2001;5(1):23–41.
47.
LynchJKaplanG. Socioeconomic position. In: BerkmanLFKawachiI, eds. Social Epidemiology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2000:13–35.
48.
LynchJKaplanGASalonenJT. Why do poor people behave poorly? Variation in adult health behaviors and psychosocial characteristics by stages of the socioeconomic lifecourse. Soc Sci Med.1997;44:809–819.
49.
MontezJKEschbachK. Country of birth and language are uniquely associated with intakes of fat, fiber, and fruits and vegetables among Mexican-American women in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:473–480.
