Contribution of Neighborhood Income and Access to Quality Physical Activity Resources to Physical Activity in Ethnic Minority Women over Time

Abstract

Purpose.

To create and test an index to indicate both availability and quality of physical activity (PA) resources (PARs), to examine associations between access to quality PARs and changes in PA, and to determine whether this association differed in lower- and higher-income neighborhoods.

Design.

Longitudinal, 6-month intervention.

Setting.

Houston and Austin, Texas.

Subjects.

African-American and Hispanic or Latina women.

Measures.

Women (N = 410) completed a questionnaire and accelerometry to measure PA. Neighborhoods (N = 163) were classified as lower- or higher-income by median household income at the census-tract level. PARs were audited using the PARA (physical activity resource assessment). Access to quality PARs was determined by a composite index (QPAR) of features, amenities, and incivilities.

Analysis.

Repeated measures analyses of variance were used to examine changes in PA by (1) neighborhood income (lower/higher) and QPAR (lower/higher) groups, and (2) neighborhood income (lower/higher) and number of PARs (lower/higher) groups, adjusting for ethnicity, household income, and body mass index.

Results.

Women in neighborhoods with lower QPAR scores had small increases in self-reported vigorous PA (M Δ = 327.8 metabolic equivalent of task [MET]-min/wk) and decreases in accelerometer PA (M = −3.4 min/d), compared to those with higher QPAR scores who had larger increases in self-reported vigorous PA (M Δ = 709.8 MET-min/wk) and increased accelerometer PA (M = 3.9 min/d). There was a significant interaction between changes in leisure-time PA, QPAR score, and number of PARs (p = .049). Women with both more PARs and higher QPAR scores reported greater increases in leisure-time PA than women with fewer PARs and lower QPAR scores.

Conclusion.

Access to higher-quality PARs can help increase or maintain PA over time regardless of neighborhood income. PAR quality is a separate and distinct, important determinant of PA in ethnic minority women.

Keywords

Physical Activity Socioeconomic Status Built Environment Minority Health Women Adults Prevention Research Manuscript format: research Research purpose: modeling/relationship testing Study design: nonexperimental Outcome measure: behavioral Setting: local community Health focus: fitness/physical activity Strategy: built environment Target population age: adults Target population circumstances: education/income level geographic location and race/ethnicity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abeyta

Tuitt

Byers

Sauaia

. Effect of community affluence on the association between individual socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease risk factors, Colorado, 2007–2008. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E115.

Boone-Heinonen

Evenson

Song

Gordon-Larsen

. Built and socioeconomic environments: Patterning and associations with physical activity in US adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:45.

Lee

Adamus-Leach

Cheung

. Researching those who have the most to gain: Focused physical activity promotion in lower socioeconomic populations. Curr Cardiovas Risk Rep. 2012;6:355–361.

Lee

Cubbin

Winkleby

. Contribution of neighbourhood socioeconomic status and physical activity resources to physical activity among women. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:882–890.

Turrell

Haynes

Wilson

Giles-Corti

. Can the built environment reduce health inequalities: A study of neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and walking for transport. Health Place. 2013;19:89–98.

Sallis

Saelens

Frank

. Neighborhood built environment and income: Examining multiple health outcomes. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:1285–1293.

Spence

Lee

. Toward a comprehensive model of physical activity. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2003;4:7–24.

Lee

Cubbin

. Striding toward social justice: The ecologic milieu of physical activity. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2009;37:10–17.

McAlexander

Banda

McAlexander

Lee

. Physical activity resource attributes and obesity in low-income African Americans. J Urban Health. 2009;86:696–707.

10.

Lee

Booth

Reese-Smith

. The Physical Activity Resource Assessment (PARA) instrument: Evaluating features, amenities and incivilities of physical activity resources in urban neighborhoods. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2005;2:13.

11.

Sallis

Hovell

Hofstetter

. Distance between homes and exercise facilities related to frequency of exercise among San Diego residents. Public Health Rep. 1990;105:179–185.

12.

Cutumisu

Spence

. Sport fields as potential catalysts for physical activity in the neighbourhood. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9:294–314.

13.

Karusisi

Bean

Oppert

. Multiple dimensions of residential environments, neighborhood experiences, and jogging behavior in the RECORD Study. Prev Med. 2012;55:50–55.

14.

Estabrooks

Lee

Gyurcsik

. Resources for physical activity participation: Does availability and accessibility differ by neighborhood socioeconomic status? Ann Behav Med. 2003;25:100–104.

15.

Michael

Perdue

Orwoll

. Physical activity resources and changes in walking in a cohort of older men. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:654–660.

16.

Cutts

Darby

Boone

Brewis

. City structure, obesity, and environmental justice: An integrated analysis of physical and social barriers to walkable streets and park access. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:1314–1322.

17.

Svastisalee

Schipperijn

Hostein

. Exposure to physical activity resources by neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics in Copenhagen. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9:1065–1073.

18.

Kaczynski

Potwarka

Saelens

. Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1451–1456.

19.

Zoellner

Hill

Zynda

. Environmental perceptions and objective walking trail audits inform a community-based participatory research walking intervention. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:6.

20.

Colabianchi

Maslow

Swayampakala

. Features and amenities of school playgrounds: A direct observation study of utilization and physical activity levels outside of school time. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:32.

21.

Powell

Slater

Chaloupka

Harper

. Availability of physical activity-related facilities and neighborhood demographic and socioeconomic characteristics: A national study. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:1676–1680.

22.

Cleland

Timperio

Crawford

. Are perceptions of the physical and social environment associated with mothers' walking for leisure and for transport: A longitudinal study. Prev Med. 2008;47:188–193.

23.

Lee

Mama

Medina

. Multiple measures of physical activity, dietary habits and weight status in African American and Hispanic or Latina women. J Community Health. 2011;36:1011–1023.

24.

Lee

Medina

Mama

. Health is Power: An ecological, theory-based health intervention for women of color. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011;32:916–923.

25.

Lee

O'Connor

Smith-Ray

. Mediating effects of group cohesion on physical activity and diet in women of color: Health is power. Am J Health Promot. 2012;26:e116–e125.

26.

Thomas

Reading

Shephard

. Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can J Sport Sci. 1992;17:338–345.

27.

California Department of Public Health . Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA) Survey. 2006. Available at: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/surveys/Pages/MaternalandInfantHealthAssessment%28MIHA%29survey.aspx. Accessed December 6, 2013.

28.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. 2006. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/PrenatalSmkbk/data_sources_definitions.htm. Accessed December 6, 2013.

29.

Sarnoff

Hughes

. Increasing health insurance coverage in the first year of life. Matern Child Health J. 2005;9:343–350.

30.

Sjostrom

. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). 2001. Available at: http://www.ipaq.ki.se/index.htm. Accessed December 6, 2013.

31.

Craig

Marshall

Sjostrom

. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381–1395.

32.

ActiGraph. 2009. Available at: http://www.theactigraph.com. Accessed December 6, 2013.

33.

Welk

. Principles of design and analyses for the calibration of accelerometry-based activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(suppl 11):S501–S511.

34.

Layne

Mama

Banda

Lee

. Development of an ecologically valid approach to assess moderate physical activity using accelerometry in community dwelling women of color: A cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:21.

35.

Parmenter

McMillan

Cubbin

Lee

. Developing geospatial data management, recruitment, and analysis techniques for physical activity research. J Urban Reg Inf Syst Assoc. 2008;20:13–19.

36.

Heinrich

Lee

Regan

. How does the built environment relate to body mass index and obesity prevalence among public housing residents? Am J Health Promot. 2008;22:187–194.

37.

Heinrich

Lee

Suminski

. Associations between the built environment and physical activity in public housing residents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007;4:56.

38.

United States Census Bureau . Median Income in the Past 12 Months 2006–2010 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. 2006–2010. Available at: http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t. Accessed December 6, 2013.

39.

McAlexander

Mama

Medina

. The concordance of directly and indirectly measured built environment attributes and physical activity adoption. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:72.