To examine associations among psychosocial constructs of behavior change and postintervention changes in diet and physical activity (PA).
Design.
Quasi-experimental with cluster (church) treatment assignment.
Setting.
Churches (n = 8) in a rural, southern region of the United States.
Subjects.
A total of 403 African-American adults participating in the Delta Body and Soul study.
Intervention.
Six-month diet and PA intervention consisting of monthly didactic educational sessions with specific emphasis on increasing consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, and decreasing consumption of added sugars. Self-directed PA was promoted throughout the intervention.
Measures.
Validated surveys for all dietary, PA, and psychosocial measures.
Analysis.
Secondary analysis using generalized linear mixed models to test for significant intervention effects on psychosocial constructs and for significant associations between changes in psychosocial constructs and changes in diet and PA outcomes after controlling for covariates.
Results.
Intervention effects were apparent for several dietary psychosocial constructs (improvements ranging from .5 to 2.0 points), but only one PA construct (decisional balance for exercise). Changes in psychosocial constructs, including self-efficacy, social support, and decisional balance, were significant predictors of dietary outcome changes (model coefficients ranging from .03 to .42), but not PA changes.
Conclusion.
Understanding which psychosocial constructs predict improvements in dietary and PA behaviors helps inform theoretical mechanisms of action and identify social and behavioral processes to target in faith-based interventions.
ErvinRB. Healthy Eating Index–2005 total and component scores for adults aged 20 and over: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2004. Natl Health Stat Rep.2011:1–9.
2.
OgdenCLKitBKCarrollMDParkS. Consumption of sugar drinks in the United States, 2005–2008. NCHS Data Brief. 2011:1–8.
3.
TroianoRPBerriganDDoddKW. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:181–188.
4.
SchillerJSLucasJWWardBWPeregoyJA. Summary health statistics for US adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2010. Vital Health Stat 10. 2012:1–207.
5.
KumanyikaSKObarzanekEStettlerN. Population-based prevention of obesity: The need for comprehensive promotion of healthful eating, physical activity, and energy balance: A scientific statement from American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Interdisciplinary Committee for Prevention (formerly the expert panel on population and prevention science). Circulation. 2008;118:428–464.
6.
EllisonCHummerRBurdetteABenjaminsM. Race, religious involvement, and health: The case of African Americans. In: EllisonCGHummerRA, eds. Religion, Families, and Health: Population-Based Research in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2010:321–348.
7.
NeighborsHWMusickMAWilliamsDR. The African American minister as a source of help for serious personal crises: Bridge or barrier to mental health care?Health Educ Behav. 1998;25:759–777.
8.
OryMGJordanPJBazzarreT. The Behavior Change Consortium: Setting the stage for a new century of health behavior-change research. Health Educ Res.2002;17:500–511.
9.
PalmeiraALTeixeiraPJBrancoTL. Predicting short-term weight loss using four leading health behavior change theories. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007;4:14.
10.
AndersonESWinettRAWojcikJR. Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: Social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior. Ann Behav Med.2007;34:304–312.
11.
FoltaSCLichtensteinAHSeguinRA. The StrongWomen-Healthy Hearts program: Reducing cardiovascular disease risk factors in rural sedentary, overweight, and obese midlife and older women. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:1271–1277.
12.
FuemmelerBFMasseLCYarochAL. Psychosocial mediation of fruit and vegetable consumption in the body and soul effectiveness trial. Health Psychol. 2006;25:474–483.
13.
LuszczynskaACieslakR. Mediated effects of social support for healthy nutrition: Fruit and vegetable intake across 8 months after myocardial infarction. Behav Med.2009;35:30–38.
14.
LubansDRFosterCBiddleSJ. A review of mediators of behavior in interventions to promote physical activity among children and adolescents. Prev Med.2008;47:463–470.
15.
WeinbergRSGouldD. Foundations of Sport and Excercise Psychology. 4th ed.Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics; 2007.
16.
HaglerASNormanGJZabinskiMF. Psychosocial correlates of dietary intake among overweight and obese men. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31:3–12.
17.
YatesBCPullenCHSantoJB. The influence of cognitive-perceptual variables on patterns of change over time in rural midlife and older women's healthy eating. Soc Sci Med.2012;75:659–667.
18.
HermstadAKSwanDWKeglerMC. Individual and environmental correlates of dietary fat intake in rural communities: A structural equation model analysis. Soc Sci Med.2010;71:93–101.
19.
BairdJCooperCMargettsBM; Food Choice Group UoS. Changing health behaviour of young women from disadvantaged backgrounds: Evidence from systematic reviews. Proc Nutr Soc.2009;68:195–204.
20.
GeorgeESKoltGSDuncanMJ. A review of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for adult males. Sports Med.2012;42:281–300.
21.
DebnamKHoltCLClarkEM. Relationship between religious social support and general social support with health behaviors in a national sample of African Americans. J Behav Med.2012;35:179–189.
22.
ClelandCLTullyMAKeeFCupplesME. The effectiveness of physical activity interventions in socio-economically disadvantaged communities: A systematic review. Prev Med.2012;54:371–380.
23.
ParkANitzkeSKritschK. Internet-based interventions have potential to affect short-term mediators and indicators of dietary behavior of young adults. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008;40:288–297.
24.
SalehiLMohammadKMontazeriA. Fruit and vegetables intake among elderly Iranians: A theory-based interventional study using the five-a-day program. Nutr J.2011;10:123.
25.
ConroyMBSimkin-SilvermanLRPetteeKK. Lapses and psychosocial factors related to physical activity in early postmenopause. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:1858–1866.
26.
Tussing-HumphreysLMThomsonJLMayoTEdmondE. A church-based diet and physical activity intervention for rural, Lower Mississippi Delta African American adults: Delta Body and Soul effectiveness study, 2010–2011. Prev Chronic Dis.2013;10:120286.
27.
ResnicowKCampbellMKCarrC. Body and soul: A dietary intervention conducted through African-American churches. Am J Prev Med.2004;27:97–105.
28.
ResnicowKJacksonAWangT. A motivational interviewing intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake through Black churches: Results of the Eat for Life trial. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1686–1693.
29.
CampbellMKMotsingerBMIngramA. The North Carolina Black Churches United for Better Health Project: Intervention and process evaluation. Health Educ Behav. 2000;27:241–253.
30.
ProchaskaJODiClementeCCNorcrossJC. In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47:1102–1114.
31.
IsraelBA. Social networks and social support: Implications for natural helper and community level interventions. Health Educ Q.1985;12:65–80.
32.
TopolskiTDLoGerfoJPatrickDL. The rapid assessment of physical activity (RAPA) among older adults. Prev Chronic Dis.2006;3:A118.
33.
TuckerKLMarasJChampagneC. A regional food-frequency questionnaire for the US Mississippi Delta. Public Health Nutr.2005;8:87–96.
34.
US Department of Health and Human Services, US Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2005. 6th ed.Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; January 2005.
35.
GuentherPMReedyJKrebs-SmithSM. Development of the Healthy Eating Index–2005. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:1896–1901.
36.
WillettW. Nutritional Epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
37.
De VetEde NooijerJde VriesNKBrugJ. The Transtheoretical model for fruit, vegetable and fish consumption: Associations between intakes, stages of change and stage transition determinants. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006;3:13.
38.
CostelloABOsborneJW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assess Res Eval.2005;10:1–9.
39.
SallisJFGrossmanRMPinskiRB. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev Med.1987;16:825–836.
40.
SallisJFPinskiRBGrossmanRM. The development of self-efficacy scales for health-related diet and exercise behaviors. Health Educ Res.1988;3:283–292.
41.
AndersonESWinettRAWojcikJRWilliamsDM. Social cognitive mediators of change in a group randomized nutrition and physical activity intervention: Social support, self-efficacy, outcome expectations and self-regulation in the guide-to-health trial. J Health Psychol. 2010;15:21–32.
42.
ScholzUNagyGGohnerW. Changes in self-regulatory cognitions as predictors of changes in smoking and nutrition behaviour. Psychol Health. 2009;24:545–561.
43.
HaerensLCerinEDeforcheB. Explaining the effects of a 1-year intervention promoting a low fat diet in adolescent girls: A mediation analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007;4:55.
44.
BrugJ. Determinants of healthy eating: Motivation, abilities and environmental opportunities. Fam Pract. 2008;25(suppl 1):i50–i55.
45.
FrancisSLTaylorMLHaldemanLM. Nutrition education improves morale and self-efficacy for middle-aged and older women. J Nutr Elder. 2009;28:272–286.
46.
PoddarKHHosigKWAndersonES. Web-based nutrition education intervention improves self-efficacy and self-regulation related to increased dairy intake in college students. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:1723–1727.
47.
RhodesREPfaeffliLA. Mediators of physical activity behaviour change among adult non-clinical populations: A review update. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:37.
48.
PapandonatosGDWilliamsDMJenningsEG. Mediators of physical activity behavior change: Findings from a 12-month randomized controlled trial. Health Psychol. 2012;31:512–520.
49.
AldanaSGGreenlawRLDiehlHA. The behavioral and clinical effects of therapeutic lifestyle change on middle-aged adults. Prev Chronic Dis.2006;3:A05.
50.
CampbellMKHoness-MorrealeLFarrellD. A tailored multimedia nutrition education pilot program for low-income women receiving food assistance. Health Educ Res.1999;14:257–267.
51.
BankheadCRBrettJBukachC. The impact of screening on future health-promoting behaviours and health beliefs: A systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(42):1–92.
52.
LevavJFitzsimonsGJ. When questions change behavior: The role of ease of representation. Psychol Sci.2006;17:207–213.
53.
DamronDLangenbergPAnlikerJ. Factors associated with attendance in a voluntary nutrition education program. Am J Health Promot. 1999;13:268–275.
54.
WhaleyDEHaleyPP. Creating community, assessing need: Preparing for a community physical activity intervention. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008;79:245–255.
55.
GlasgowREVogtTMBolesSM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322–1327.
56.
SallisJDOwenN. Ecological models of health behavior. In: GlanzKLewisFMRimerBK, eds. Health Education and Health Behavior: Theory, Research and Practice. 3rd ed.San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2002:462–484.
