Describe small business support for youth physical activity opportunities (YPAO) and identify factors associated with this support.
Design.
Cross-sectional analysis of quantitative data relating business characteristics and support for YPAO.
Setting.
Eight demographically heterogeneous, urban neighborhoods in a Midwest metropolitan area.
Subjects.
Adult small business owners (n = 90; 65% response rate; mean age 48.4 years; 73.3% male; 45.2% minority).
Measures.
Neighborhood demographics from the 2000 U.S. Census and self-reported business and owner characteristics.
Analysis.
Multivariate analysis of variance was used to contrast business and owner characteristics between businesses that did and did not support YPAO.
Results.
Businesses supporting YPAO had larger annual operating (F = 7.6; p = .018) and advertising budgets (F = 8.5; p = .009) and had younger owners (F = 6.1; p = .034), with sports backgrounds (χ2 = 5.6; p = .018) and who felt businesses should support YPAO (χ2 = 3.8; p = .048). Of the 46 businesses not supporting YPAO, 82.6% felt small businesses should support YPAO. The major reasons for nonsupport were difficulty identifying YPAO to support and not being asked for support.
Conclusions.
Business (e.g., budgets) and business owner characteristics (e.g., age), owner connectedness with YPAO, and the approach used for garnering support (active solicitation, clearly defined support mechanism) were associated with supporting YPAO. Additional business (e.g., annual revenues), owner (e.g., perceptions of YPAO), and environmental (e.g., crime rate, land use) factors should be examined as potential correlates.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Physical activity levels among children aged 9–13 years—United States, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.2003;52:785–788.
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.2006;55:SS–5.
3.
US Dept of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2020: the road ahead. Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/hp2020. Accessed October 15, 2010.
4.
SallisJFCerveroRAscherWW. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health.2006;27:297–322.
5.
SpenceJLeeRE. Toward a comprehensive model of physical activity. Psychol Sport Exerc.2003;4:7–24.
6.
SallisJFProchaskaJJTaylorWC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Med Science Sport Exerc.2000;32:963–975.
7.
HumbertMLChadKESpinkKS. Factors that influence physical activity participation among high- and low-income youth. Qual Health Res.2006;16:467–483.
8.
RomeroAJ. Low-income neighborhood barriers and resources for adolescents' physical activity. J Adolesc Health.2005;36:253–259.
9.
TimperioACrawfordDTelfordASalmonJ. Perceptions about the local neighborhood and walking and cycling among children. Prev Med.2004;38:39–47.
10.
FrankLKerrJChapmanJSallisJ. Urban form relationships with walk trip frequency and distance among youth. Am J Health Promot.2007;21:305–311.
11.
RoemmichJNEpsteinLHRajaSYinL. The neighborhood and home environments: disparate relationships with physical activity and sedentary behaviors in youth. Ann Behav Med.2007;33:29–38.
12.
Gordon-LarsenPGriffithsPBentleyME. Barriers to physical activity: qualitative data on caregiver-daughter perceptions and practices. Am J Prev Med.2004;27:218–223.
13.
DrenowatzCEisenmannJCPfeifferKA. Influence of socio-economic status on habitual physical activity and sedentary behavior in 8- to 11-year old children. BMC Public Health.2010;10:214.
14.
HustonSLEvensonKRBorsPGizliceZ. Neighborhood environment, access to places for activity, and leisure-time physical activity in a diverse North Carolina Population. Am J Health Promot.2003;18:58–69.
15.
KaczynskiATHendersonKA. Parks and recreation settings and active living: a review of associations with physical activity function and intensity. J Phys Act Health.2008;5:619–632.
16.
Small Business Administration (SBA) Office of Advocacy. Frequently asked questions. Available at: http://www.sba.gov/advo/stats/sbfaq.html. Accessed June 16, 2010.
17.
MackRW. Event sponsorship: an exploratory study of small business objectives, practices, and perceptions. J Small Bus Manag.1999;37:25–30.
18.
SlackTBentzL. The involvement of small businesses in sport sponsorship. Managing Leisure.1996;1:175–184.
19.
DubeJE. Increasing Member Donations: Transforming Members in to Donors at the Broome County YMCA [Master's thesis]. Binghampton, NY: Binghampton University, State University of New York; 2010.
20.
MaddenKScaifeWCrissmanK. How and why small to medium size enterprises engage with their communities: an Australian study. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark.2006;11:49–60.
21.
Williams-TraceyL. Size doesn't matter. Bus J.2004;19:24.
22.
BradyMNobleCUtterDSmithG. How to give and receive: an exploratory study of charitable hybrids. Psychol Mark.2002;19:919–944.
23.
WalkerC. Philanthropy, social capital or strategic alliance? The involvement of senior UK business executives with the voluntary sector and implications for corporate funding. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark.2002;7:219–228.
24.
Princeton Survey Research Associates Inc.BBB Wise Giving Alliance: small business giving survey.Fredericksburg, Va: Better Business Bureau Wise Giving Alliance; 2001.
25.
GomolkaE. The social responsibility of minority-owned small business companies. Am J Small Bus.1978;2:1–12.
26.
SuminskiRRPostonWHyderM. Small business policies toward physical activity promotion. J Phys Act Health.2006;3:120–128.
27.
WeissLOmpadDGaleaSVlahovD. Defining neighborhood boundaries for urban health research. Am J Prev Med.2007;32:S154–S159.
28.
US Bureau of the Census. American Fact Finder. Census 2000 summary file 3 (SF 3)—sample data. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov. Accessed February 10, 2010.
29.
McMenaminSBSchmittdielJHalpinHA. Health promotion in physician organizations: results from a national study. Am J Prev Med.2004;26:259–264.
30.
LloydTWhy Rich People Give.London, United Kingdom: Philanthropy UK; 2004.
31.
PivikiJR. Practical strategies for facilitating meaningful citizen involvement in health planning.Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa; 2002. Available at: http://www.aprioriresearch.com/Romonov%20paper-Pivik.pdf. Accessed October. 10, 2010.
32.
RyanSM. Fees for extracurricular activities alienate students who would otherwise participate and should be replaced with alternate means of fundraising. Seton Hall J Sport Law.2003;13:239–260.
33.
WebbJCarterS. Sponsorship activities and the small firms sector. Manag Leisure.2001;6:168–179.
34.
RieckenGYavasU. The attitudes of donors and non-donors to the March of Dimes charity in the United States. A case study in non-profit marketing. Int J Manag.2005;22:572–581.
35.
KottaszR. How should charitable organizations motivate young professionals to give philanthropically?Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark.2004; 9:9–27.
36.
AS8000. 2003. Australian corporate social responsibility standards. Available at: www.standards.com.au. Accessed January 9, 2011.
37.
KumanyikaSGrierS. Targeting interventions for ethnic minority and low-income populations. Future Child.2006;16:187–207.
38.
GravetterFJWallnauLBEssentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.6th ed.Belmont, Calif: Thomson Wadsworth; 2008.
39.
VeitchJSalmonJBallK. Children's active free play in local neighborhoods: a behavioral mapping study. Health Educ Res.2008;23:870–879.
