Improving Cancer Screening among Women with Mobility Impairments: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Participatory Workshop Intervention

Abstract

Purpose.

To assess the efficacy of an intervention to promote mammography and Papanicolaou (Pap) testing among women with mobility impairments overdue for screenings

Design.

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting.

Urban and suburban Oregon.

Participants.

Women aged 35 to 64 with mobility impairments who reported not receiving a Pap test in the past 3 years and/or mammogram (if age > 40 years) in the last 2 years were eligible. A total of 211 women were randomized, and 156 completed the study (26% attrition). The majority were not employed and reported annual income <$10,000.

Intervention.

The Promoting Access to Health Services (PATHS) program is a 90-minute, small-group, participatory workshop with 6 months of structured telephone support, based on the health belief model and social cognitive theory.

Measures.

Perceived susceptibility to breast and cervical cancer, perceived benefits of and self-efficacy for screening intention to be screened, and self-reported receipt of mammography and Pap testing.

Analysis.

Chi-square tests to examine the proportion of women obtaining screening; analysis of covariance to examine change in theoretical mediators.

Results.

The intervention group received more Pap tests than the control group at posttest (intervention 61 %, control 27%, n = 71, p < .01). No significant group effect was observed for mammography (intervention 49%, control 42%, n = 125, p = .45).

Conclusion.

Findings indicate that the PATHS intervention promotes Pap testing but not mammography among women with mobility impairments.

Keywords

Mammography Vaginal Smears Disability Randomized Controlled Trial Psychological Theory Prevention Research Manuscript format: research Research purpose: intervention testing Study design: randomized trial Outcome measure: cognitive,behavioral Setting: local community Health focus: medical self-care Strategy: skill building/behavior change Target population age: adults Target population circumstances: disability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

US Preventive Services Task Force. The Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007.

Armour

Thierry

Wolf

. State-level differences in breast and cervical cancer screening by disability status: United States, 2008. Womens Health Issues. 2009;19:406–414.

Chevarley

Thierry

Gill

. Health, preventive health care, and health care access among women with disabilities in the 1994–1995 National Health Interview Survey, Supplement on Disability. Womens Health Issues. 2006;16:297–312.

Roetzheim

Chirikos

. Breast cancer detection and outcomes in a disability beneficiary population. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2002;13:461–476.

McCarthy

Ngo

Chirikos

. Cancer stage at diagnosis and survival among persons with Social Security Disability Insurance on Medicare. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:611–628.

Kailes

. Making Preventive Health Care Work for You—A Resource Guide for People With Physical Disabilities. Washington, DC: National Rehabilitation Hospital; 2006.

Bandura

. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.

Rosenstock

Strecher

Becker

. Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Behav. 1988;15:175–183.

Drum

Peterson

Culley

. Guidelines and criteria for the implementation of community-based health promotion programs for individuals with disabilities. Am J Health Promot. 2009;24:93–101.

10.

Suzuki

Peterson

Weatherby

. Using intervention mapping to promote the receipt of clinical preventive services among women with physical disabilities [published online ahead of print November 8, 2010]. Health Promot Pract. doi:10.1177/1524839910382624.

11.

Witte

Cameron

McKeon

Berkowitz

. Predicting risk behaviors: development and validation of a diagnostic scale. J Health Commun. 1996;1:317–341.

12.

Rakowski

Ehrich

Dubé

. Screening mammography and constructs from the transtheoretical model: associations using two definitions of the stages-of-adoption. Ann Behav Med. 1996;18:91–100.

13.

Legler

Meissner

Coyne

. The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:59–71.

14.

Barr

Giannotti

Van Hoof

. Understanding barriers to participation in mammography by women with disabilities. Am J Health Promot. 2008;22:381–385.

15.

Walsh

McNeff

Campbell

. Reaching the hard-to-reach: lessons learned in promoting health of women with mobility impairments. Poster presented at: American Public Health Association Annual Meeting; November 7–11, 2009; Philadelphia, Pa.