Examine effects of exposure to two types of cessation advertisements on changes in cessation-related outcomes.
Design.
Experimental data from a nationally representative, longitudinal sample of smokers, collected in three waves over 4 weeks.
Setting.
National.
Subjects.
Three thousand and two adult U.S. smokers aged 18+ completed baseline and follow-up interviews at 2 and 4 weeks, from December 2010 to February 2011.
Intervention.
Six randomly assigned conditions consisting of repeated exposure to cessation advertisements: why-to-quit advertisements featuring emotional, personal testimonies (1: WTQ-T) or graphic images (2: WTQ-G); how-to-quit advertisements (3: HTQ), a combination of both (4: WTQ-T + HTQ; 5: WTQ-G + HTQ), and no-ad condition (6: control).
Measures.
Cessation-related beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and quitting behavior.
Analysis.
Multivariable ordinary least squares and logistic regressions testing whether exposure to antitobacco television advertisements were associated with changes in tobacco-related outcomes.
Results.
Exposure to WTQ-T or WTQ-G advertisements, both alone and combined with HTQ advertisements, elicited positive change in beliefs, attitudes, and intentions as compared to controls. Smokers in three of four WTQ conditions were substantially more likely to have quit smoking at 4 weeks than controls (odds ratios range from 5.9 to 10.1, p < .05 or better). No effects were found for the HTQ-only condition.
Conclusion.
Exposure to WTQ advertisements markedly increases the odds that a smoker will quit in the study period, suggesting positive movement toward successful, long-term cessation. HTQ advertisements did not enhance advertising effectiveness and may not be suitable as a primary message strategy.
DurkinSBrennanEWakefieldM. Mass media campaigns to promote smoking cessation among adults: An integrative review. Tob Control. 2012;21:127–138.
2.
FarrellyMCCrankshawECDavisKC. Assessing the effectiveness of the mass media in discouraging smoking behavior. In: National Cancer Institute, ed. The Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use. Bethesda, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2008:479–546.
3.
WakefieldMALokenBHornikRC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet. 2010;376:1261–1271.
4.
WakefieldMASpittalMJYongHH. Effects of mass media campaign exposure intensity and durability on quit attempts in a population-based cohort study. Health Educ Res.2011;26:988–997.
5.
BeaudoinCE. Exploring antismoking ads: Appeals, themes, and consequences. J Health Commun. 2002;7:123–137.
6.
FarrellyMCDukeJCDavisKC. Promotion of smoking cessation with emotional and/or graphic antismoking advertising. Am J Prev Med.2012;43:475–482.
7.
DurkinSJBienerLWakefieldMA. Effects of different types of antismoking ads on reducing disparities in smoking cessation among socioeconomic subgroups. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:2217–2223.
8.
LangANewhagenJReevesB. Negative video as structure: Emotion, attention, capacity, and memory. J Broadcasting Electron Media. 1996;40:460–477.
9.
NabiRL. A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Commun Theory. 1999;9:292–320.
10.
BienerLMcCallum-KeelerGNymanAL. Adults' response to Massachusetts antitobacco television advertisements: Impact of viewer and advertisement characteristics. Tob Control. 2000;9:401–407.
11.
DavisKCNonnemakerJMFarrellyMCNiederdeppeJ. Exploring differences in smokers' perceptions of the effectiveness of cessation media messages. Tob Control. 2011;20:26–33.
12.
WongNCCappellaJN. Antismoking threat and efficacy appeals: Effects on smoking cessation intentions for smokers with low and high readiness to quit. J Appl Commun Res.2009;37:1–20.
13.
ValloneDMDukeJCCullenJ. Evaluation of EX: A national mass media smoking cessation campaign. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:302–309.
14.
ValloneDMDukeJCMoweryPD. The impact of EX: Results from a pilot smoking-cessation media campaign. Am J Prev Med.2010;38(3 suppl):S312–S318.
15.
MosbaekCHAustinDFStarkMJLambertLC. The association between advertising and calls to a tobacco quitline. Tob Control. 2007;16(suppl 1):i24–i29.
16.
FarrellyMCDavisKCNonnemakerJM. Promoting calls to a quitline: Quantifying the influence of message theme, strong negative emotions and graphic images in television advertisements. Tob Control. 2011;20:279–284.
17.
WitteK. Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Commun Monogr. 1992;59:329–349.
18.
MongeauPA. Another look at fear-arousing persuasive appeals. In: AllenMPreissRW, ed. Persuasion: Advances Through Meta-Analysis. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press Inc; 1998:53–68.
19.
SuttonS. Fear-arousing communications: A critical examination of theory and research. In: EiserJR, ed. Social Psychology Studies and Behavioral Medicine. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1982:303–337.
20.
WitteKAllenM. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav. 2000;27:591–615.
21.
StephensonMTWitteK. Fear, threat, and perceptions of efficacy from frightening skin cancer messages. Public Health Rev.1998;26:147–174.
22.
WitteK. Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Commun Monogr. 1994;61:113–134.
23.
WitteKBerkowitzJMCameronKAMcKeonJK. Preventing the spread of genital warts: Using fear appeals to promote self-protective behaviors. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25:571–585.
24.
DisograCCobbCLChanEDennisJM. Using probability-based online samples to calibrate non-probability opt-in samples. Presentation at: 67th Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR); May 2012; Orlando, Fla.
25.
BienerLReimerRLWakefieldM. Impact of smoking cessation aids and mass media among recent quitters. Am J Prev Med.2006;30:217–224.
26.
NiederdeppeJFarrellyMCNonnemakerJ. Socioeconomic variation in recall and perceived effectiveness of campaign advertisements to promote smoking cessation. Soc Sci Med.2011;72:773–780.
27.
M W. Personal communication regarding advertising classification. 2012.
28.
K G. Personal communication regarding advertising classification2012.
29.
D V. Personal communication regarding advertising classification. 2011.
30.
DavisKCNonnemakerJDukeJFarrellyMC. Perceived effectiveness of cessation advertisements: The importance of audience reactions and practical implications for media campaign planning. Health Commun. In press.
31.
RosenstockIM. Why people use health services. Milbank Mem Fund Q.1966;44(3 suppl):94–127.
32.
RosenstockIMStrecherVJBeckerMH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Q.1988;15:175–183.
33.
JanzNKBeckerMH. The health belief model: A decade later. Health Educ Q.1984;11:1–47.
34.
KoblitzARMagnanREMcCaulKD. Smokers' thoughts and worries: A study using ecological momentary assessment. Health Psychol. 2009;28:484–492.
35.
FishbeinM. A consideration of beliefs and their role in attitude measurement. In: FishbeinM, ed. Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement. New York, NY: Wiley; 1967:257–266.
36.
VelicerWFDiClementeCCProchaskaJOBrandenburgN. Decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting smoking status. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985;48:1279–1289.
37.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office of Smoking and Health, Health Communications Branch. CDC national media campaign evaluation non-smoker follow-up questionnaire2012.
38.
MaySWestRHajekP. Randomized controlled trial of a social support (“buddy”) intervention for smoking cessation. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64:235–241.
39.
Florida Dept of Public Health. The Florida online outcome adult survey2011.
40.
ValloneDMNiederdeppeJRichardsonAK. A national mass media smoking cessation campaign: Effects by race/ethnicity and education. Am J Health Promot. 2011;25(5 suppl):S38–S50.
HughesJRCallasPW. Definition of a quit attempt: A replication test. Nicotine Tob Res.2010;12:1176–1179.
45.
CokkinidesVEHalpernMTBarbeauEM. Racial and ethnic disparities in smoking-cessation interventions: Analysis of the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Am J Prev Med.2008;34:404–412.
46.
BarbeauEMKriegerNSoobaderMJ. Working class matters: Socioeconomic disadvantage, race/ethnicity, gender, and smoking in NHIS 2000. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:269–278.
47.
NiederdeppeJFioreMCBakerTBSmithSS. Smoking-cessation media campaigns and their effectiveness among socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged populations. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:916–924.
48.
NiederdeppeJKuangXCrockBSkeltonA. Media campaigns to promote smoking cessation among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: What do we know, what do we need to learn, and what should we do now?Soc Sci Med.2008;67:1343–1355.
49.
BalaMStrzeszynskiLCahillK. Mass media interventions for smoking cessation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2008;(1):CD004704.
50.
GundersenDADelnevoCDWackowskiO. Exploring the relationship between race/ethnicity, menthol smoking, and cessation, in a nationally representative sample of adults. Prev Med.2009;49:553–557.
51.
GandhiKKFouldsJSteinbergMBLuSE. Lower quit rates among African American and Latino menthol cigarette smokers at a tobacco treatment clinic. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63:360–367.
52.
FaganPShaversVLLawrenceD. Employment characteristics and socioeconomic factors associated with disparities in smoking abstinence and former smoking among U.S. workers. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007;18(4 suppl):52–72.
53.
Stata Statistical Software [computer program]. Release 12. College Station, Tex: StataCorp LP; 2011.
54.
ChoHSalmonCT. Fear appeals for individuals in different stages of change: Intended and unintended effects and implications on public health campaigns. Health Commun. 2006;20:91–99.
55.
KhadjesariZMurrayEKalaitzakiE. Impact and costs of incentives to reduce attrition in online trials: Two randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res.2011;13:e26.
56.
MurrayEKhadjesariZWhiteIR. Methodological challenges in online trials. J Med Internet Res.2009;11:e9.
57.
McCoyTPIpEHBlockerJN. Attrition bias in a U.S. Internet survey of alcohol use among college freshmen. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009;70:606–614.
