To study informal skill transfer via staff networks as a complement to formal training among afterschool childcare providers implementing a health promotion program.
Design.
Cross-sectional, sociometric network analysis.
Setting.
Boston Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA) afterschool programs implementing the iPLAY program.
Participants.
All 91 staff members at 20 sites were eligible; 80 completed the survey (88% response rate).
Measures.
At the network level, network density measured system-level connectedness. At the staff level, the independent variable was out degree, the number of individuals to whom respondents noted a program-related connection. The dependent variable was skill gains, the number of key implementation skills gained from the network.
Analysis.
We mapped the staff program-related social network. We utilized multiple linear regression to estimate the relationship between out degree and skill gains, and we adjusted for clustering of staff in sites.
Results.
Most staff (77%) reported gaining at least one skill from the network, but only 2% of potential network connections were established. The regression model showed that out degree (i.e., number of program-related contacts) was significantly associated with skill gains (β = .48, p < .01) independent of other variables.
Conclusion.
Informal skill transfer in staff networks may be a useful complement to formal training for implementation of health promotion programs, but informal skill transfer was likely underutilized in this network. Future research employing longitudinal and/or multisite data should examine these findings in greater detail.
Institute of Medicine.Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
2.
GlasgowREEmmonsK. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413–433.
3.
OwenNGlanzKSallisJFKelderSH. Evidence-based approaches to dissemination and diffusion of physical activity interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31(suppl 4):S35–S44.
4.
FixsenDLNaoomSFBlaseKA. Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature.Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network; 2005.
5.
GreenhalghTRobertGMacfarlaneF. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82:581–629.
6.
PentzMA. Form follows function: designs for prevention effectiveness and diffusion research. Prev Sci. 2004;5:23–29.
7.
JoyceBShowersB. Student Achievement Through Staff Development.3rd ed.Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development; 2002.
8.
DennehyJNoamGG. Evidence for Action: Strengthening After-School Programs for All Children and Youth: The Massachusetts Out-of-School Time Workforce.Boston, Mass: Achieve Boston, an Initiative of Boston After School and Beyond; 2005.
9.
SheldonJHopkinsL. Supporting Success: Why and How to Improve Quality in After-School Programs.San Francisco, Calif: Public/Private Ventures and the James Irvine Foundation; 2008.
10.
BurtonAWhitebookMYoungM. Estimating the Size and Components of the U.S. Child Care Workforce and Caregiving Population: Key Findings from the Child Care Workforce Estimate.Washington, DC: Center for the Child Care Workforce and Human Services Policy Center, University of Washington; 2002.
11.
ElliottDSMihalicSF. Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prev Sci. 2004;5:47–53.
12.
LiuXBattR. The economic pay-offs to informal training: evidence from routine service work. Ind Labor Relat Rev. 2007;61:75–89.
13.
GubbinsMCFaravianTN. Studying HRD practitioners: a social capital model. Human Resource Development Review. 2005;4:189–219.
ScottJ. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook.Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1991.
16.
RogersE. Diffusion of Innovations.5th ed.New York, NY: The Free Press; 2003.
17.
HoeglMParboteeahPMunsonCL. Team-level antecedents of individuals’ knowledge networks. Decision Sciences. 2003;34:741–770.
18.
RileyBLTaylorSMElliottSJ. Organizational capacity and implementation change: a comparative case study of heart health promotion in Ontario public health agencies. Health Educ Res. 2003;18:754–769.
19.
HawePGhaliL. Use of social network analysis to map the social relationships of staff and teachers at school. Health Educ Research. 2008;23:62–69.
Institute for Healthcare Improvement.The Breakthrough Series: IHI's Collaborative Model for Achieving Breakthrough Improvement—IHI Innovation Series white paper. Boston, Mass: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2003.
24.
The YMCA of Greater Boston Inc.A Request to the Carol M. White, Physical Education Proggram, to Adopt a Physical Education Curriculum into Afterschool and Summer Programs. Boston, Mass: YMCA of Greater Boston; 2004.
25.
HansenMT. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44:82–111.
26.
PariseS. Knowledge management and human resource development: an application in social network analysis methods. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 2007;9:359–383.
27.
ScottJTalliaACrossonJC. Social network analysis as an analytic tool for interaction patterns in primary care practices. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:443–448.
28.
WassermanSFaustK. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Analysis.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
29.
LukeDAHarrisJK. Network analysis in public health: history, methods, and applications. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:69–93.
30.
KumbasarERommeyAKBatchelderWH. Systematic biases in social perception. Amer J Sociol. 1994;100:477–505.
31.
MarsdenPV. Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology. 1990;16:435–463.
32.
WepnerSBBowesKASerotkinRS. Technology in teacher education: creating a climate of change and collaboration. Action in Teacher Education. 2007;29:81–93.
33.
HawePWebsterCShiellA. A glossary of terms for navigating the field of social network analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:971–975.
34.
UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis [computer program]. Boston, Ma: Harvard, Analytic Technologies; 2002.
35.
SAS Version 9.0 [computer program]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 2003.
36.
KrackhardtD. Predicting with social networks: nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks. 1988;10:359–382.
WaddellDLDunnN. Peer coaching: the next step in staff development. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2005;36:84–89.
39.
HigginsM. Understanding relational learning: within and beyond team boundaries. In: General Electric Fund Conference on Advances in Team Learning. Boston, MA: Boston University; June 21–22, 2001.
40.
NeeJHowePSchmidtCColeP. Understanding the Afterschool Workforce: Opportunities and Challenges for an Emerging Profession.Charlestown, Mass: National Afterschool Association; 2006.
41.
LavertyKSiepakKBurtonA. Current Data on Child Care Salaries and Benefits in the United States.Washington, DC: Center for the Childcare Workforce; 2002.
42.
EdgeK. Powerful public sector knowledge management: a school district example. J Knowledge Management. 2005;9:42–52.
43.
KatzNLazerD. Building Effective Intra-Organizational Networks: The Role of Teams.Cambridge, Mass: Center for Public Leadership, Harvard University; 2003.
