To examine whether urban form is associated with body size within a densely-settled city.
Design.
Cross-sectional analysis using multilevel modeling to relate body mass index (BMI) to built environment resources.
Setting.
Census tracts (n = 1989) within the five boroughs of New York City.
Subjects.
Adult volunteers (n = 13,102) from the five boroughs of New York City recruited between January 2000 and December 2002.
Measures.
The dependent variable was objectively-measured BMI. Independent variables included land use mix; bus and subway stop density; population density; and intersection density. Covariates included age, gender, race, education, and census tract–level poverty and race/ethnicity.
Analysis.
Cross-sectional multilevel analyses.
Results.
Mixed land use (Beta = 2.55, p < .01), density of bus stops (Beta = −.01, p < .01) and subway stops (Beta = −.06, p < .01), and population density (Beta = −.25, p < .001), but not intersection density (Beta = −.002) were significantly inversely associated with BMI after adjustment for individual- and neighborhood-level sociodemographic characteristics. Comparing the 90th to the 10th percentile of each built environment variable, the predicted adjusted difference in BMI with increased mixed land use was −.41 units, with bus stop density was −.33 units, with subway stop density was −.34 units, and with population density was −.86 units.
Conclusion.
BMI is associated with built environment characteristics in New York City.
HedleyAAOgdenCLJohnsonCL. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. JAMA. 2004;291:2847–2850.
2.
SallisJFKraftKLintonLS. How the environment shapes physical activity: A transdisciplinary research agenda [comment]. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22:208.
3.
EwingRSchmidTKillingsworthR. Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity. Am J Health Promot. 2003;18:47–57.
4.
FrankLSchmidTSallisJ. Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28(2Suppl 2):117–125.
5.
SaelensBESallisJFBlackJBChenD. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1552–1558.
6.
KingWCBelleSHBrachJS. Objective measures of neighborhood environment and physical activity in older women. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28:461–469.
7.
FrankLAndressenMSchmidT. Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:87–96.
8.
VandegriftDYokedT. Obesity rates, income, and suburban sprawl: An analysis of US states. Health Place. 2004;10:221–229.
9.
LopezR. Urban sprawl and risk for being overweight or obese. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1574–1579.
10.
Kelly-SchwartzAStockardJDoyleSSchlossbergM. Is sprawl unhealthy? A multilevel analysis of the relationship of metropolitan sprawl to the health of individuals. J Plan Educ Res. 2004;24:184–196.
11.
Giles-CortiBMacintyreSClarksonJP. Environmental and lifestyle factors associated with overweight and obesity in Perth, Australia. Am J Health Promot. 2003;18:93–102.
12.
CerveroRDuncanM. Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1478–1483.
13.
ShriverK. Influence of environmental design on pedestrian travel behavior in four Austin neighborhoods. Transportation Res Rec. 1997;1578:64–75.
14.
HandySL. Urban form and pedestrian choices: Study of Austin neighborhoods. Transportation Res Rec. 1996;1552:135–144.
15.
GreenwaldMBoarnetM. Built environment as determinant of walking behavior: Analyzing nonwork pedestrian travel in Portland, Oregon. Transportation Res Rec. 2002;1780:33–42.
16.
MitchellMKGregersenPKJohnsonS. The New York Cancer Project: Rationale, organization, design, and baseline characteristics. J Urban Health. 2004;81:301–310.
17.
Community Studies of New York Inc.Infoshare online. Available at: www.infoshare.org. Accessed April 20th, 2006.
SingerJ. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J Educ Behav Stat. 1998;24:323–355.
20.
StoohsRABinghamLAItoiA. Sleep and sleep-disordered breathing in commercial long-haul truck drivers. Chest. May 1995;107:1275–1282.
21.
BellACGeKPopkinBM. The road to obesity or the path to prevention: Motorized transportation and obesity in China. Obes Res. Apr 2002;10(4):277–283.
22.
Gordon-LarsenPNelsonMCBeamK. Associations among active transportation, physical activity, and weight status in young adults. Obes Res. May 2005;13:868–875.
23.
WenLMOrrNMillettCRisselC. Driving to work and overweight and obesity: Findings from the 2003 New South Wales Health Survey, Australia. Int J Obes (Lond). May 2006;30:782–786.
24.
Lopez-ZetinaJLeeHFriisR. The link between obesity and the built environment. Evidence from an ecological analysis of obesity and vehicle miles of travel in California. Health Place. Dec 2006;12:656–664.
25.
KrummEMDessieuxOLAndrewsPThompsonDL. The relationship between daily steps and body composition in postmenopausal women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006;15:202–210.
26.
BarengoNCKastarinenMLakkaT. Different forms of physical activity and cardiovascular risk factors among 24–64-year-old men and women in Finland. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. Feb 2006;13:51–59.
27.
Giles-CortiBDonovanRJ. Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment. Prev Med. 2002;35:601–611.
28.
TalenEAnselinL. Assessing spatial equity: An evaluation of measures of accessibility of public playgrounds. Environ Plan. 1998;30:595–613.
29.
KleinbaumDKupperLMullerK. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods. Boston, Mass: PWS-Kent Publishing Company; 1988.
30.
RobinsJ. The control of confounding by intermediate variables. Stat Med. 1989;8:679–701.
31.
ThorpeLMackenzieKPerlS. One in 6 New York adults is obese. NYC Vital Signs. 2003;2(7):1–4.
32.
KuczmarskiMKuczmarskiRNajjarM. Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: Findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101:28–34.
33.
BostromGDiderichsenF. Socioeconomic differentials in misclassification of height, weight and body mass index based on questionnaire data. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26:860–866.
34.
SpencerEAApplebyPNDaveyGKKeyTJ. Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC-Oxford participants. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5:561–565.
35.
SobalJStunkardA. Socioeconomic status and obesity: A review of the literature. Psychol Bull. 1989;105:260–275.
36.
BallKCrawfordD. Socioeconomic status and weight change in adults: A review. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1987–2010.
37.
KriegerNChenJTWatermanPD. Choosing area based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in low birth weight and childhood lead poisoning: The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:186–199.
KriegerNChenJTWatermanPD. Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: Does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? : The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:471–482.
40.
KriegerNWatermanPChenJ. Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in sexually transmitted infections, tuberculosis, and violence: Geocoding and choice of area-based socioeconomic measures—the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US). Public Health Rep. 2003;118:240–260.
41.
JacobsDRJrHannanPJ. Interpreting age, period and cohort effects in plasma lipids and serum insulin using repeated measures regression analysis: The CARDIA Study. Stat Med. 1999;18:655–679.
