This study evaluated the use, quality and readability levels of occupational therapists' pre-discharge home visit information leaflets.
Method:
One hundred and twelve surveys were sent via email to occupational therapists working with older people. The International Patient Decision Aids Standards and the SMOG Readability Formula were used to analyse five occupational therapy home visit leaflets, supplied by the 11 occupational therapists who responded to the survey.
Results:
The five leaflets had low scores in relation to providing unbiased and detailed information. In addition, the reading level of the information leaflets was, on average, four grades higher than the recommended level.
Conclusion:
Therapists need to ensure that the information within home visit leaflets is relevant, evidence based, and targeted at the correct readability level.
AtwalAMcIntyreCCraikCHuntJ (2008a) Older adults and carers' perceptions of pre-discharge occupational therapy home visits in acute care. Age and Ageing, 37(1), 72–76.
2.
AtwalAMcIntyreACraikCHuntJ (2008b) Occupational therapists' perceptions of pre-discharge home assessments with older adults in acute care. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(2), 52–58.
3.
BakerDWGazmararianJASudanoJPattersonM (2000) The association between age and health literacy among elderly persons. Journal of Gerontology, Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55(6), S368–74.
4.
ChewLDBradleyKAFlumDRCorniaPBKoepsellTD (2004) The impact of low health literacy on surgical practice. American Journal of Surgery, 188(3), 250–53.
5.
ClerehanRBuchbinderRModdieJ (2005) A linguistic framework for assessing the quality of written patient information: Its use in assessing methotrexate information for rheumatoid arthritis. Health Education Research, 20(3), 334–44.
ElwynGO'ConnorAStaceyDVolkREdwardsACoulterAThomsonRBarrattABarryMBernsteinSButowPClarkeAEntwistleVFeldman-StewartDHolmes-RovnerMLlewellyn-ThomasHMoumjidNMulleyARulandCSepuchaKSykesAWhelanTInternational Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration (2006) Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: Online international Delphi consensus process. British Medical Journal, 333(7565), 417–19.
9.
FreemantleNBarveyELWolfFGrimshawTMGrilliRBeroLA (2008) Printed educational materials: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database 16, CD004398.
10.
GriffinJMcKennaKToothL (2003) Written health education materials: Making them more effective. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 50(3), 170–77.
11.
GriffinJMcKennaKToothL (2006) Discrepancy between older clients' ability to read and comprehend and the reading level of written educational materials used by occupational therapists. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(1), 70–80.
12.
HoffmannTWorrallL (2004) Designing effective written health education materials: Considerations for health professionals. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(19), 1166–73.
13.
JohnsonASandfordJTyndallJ (2003) Written and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged from acute hospital settings to home. Cochrane Database 4, CD003716.
14.
MarshallLAWilliamsD (2006) Health information: Does quality count for the consumers?Librarianship and Information Science, 38(3), 141–56.
15.
McKennaKScottJ (2007) Do written educational materials that use content and design principles improve older people knowledge?Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54(2), 103–12.
MountainGPighillsA (2003) Pre-discharge home visits with older people: Time to review practice. Health and Social Care in the Community, 11(2), 146–54.
PaulCLRedmanSSanson-FisherRW (2003) Print material content and design: Is it relevant to effectiveness?Health Education Research, 18(2), 181–90.
20.
SharryRMcKennaKToothL (2002) Occupational therapists' use and perceptions of written client education materials. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(5), 573–76.
21.
SmithHGoodingSBrownRFrewA (1998) Evaluation of readability and accuracy of information leaflets in general practice for patients with asthma. British Medical Journal, 317(7153), 264–65.
22.
WhitePSmithHWebleyFFrewA (2004) A survey of the quality of information leaflets on hayfever available from general practices and community pharmacies. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 34(9), 1438–43.
23.
WinslowE (2001) Patient education materials: Can patients read them or are they ending up in the trash?American Journal of Nursing, 101(10), 33–38.
