Dressing difficulties are common following stroke. However, specific interventions lack evidence. This pilot single-blind randomised controlled trial investigated normal movement and functional approaches to rehabilitate lower limb dressing, given to four eligible stroke inpatients. The Nottingham Stroke Dressing Assessment, Rivermead Motor Assessment and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure were taken at baseline, discharge and 8 weeks. The small sample lacked power. Preliminary results indicated that while all patients improved with occupational therapy, approaches may differ in rates of motor recovery, independence and treatment duration. A total sample of 30 is required for more conclusive research to inform lower limb dressing interventions.
BamfordJSandercockP (1991) Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet, 337, 1521–26.
2.
BlandM (1996) Clinstat: A simple interactive statistical program (version 08.05.96). London: St George's Hospital Medical School. Available at: http://www-users.york.ac.uk/∼mb55/soft/soft.htm Accessed on 30.03.06.
3.
British Bobath Tutors Association (2003) Basic Bobath course (adult hemiplegia): Neurophysiology course handbook. Manchester: BBTA.
4.
CouparFLeggL (2007) Commentary. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 14(3), 127.
5.
ClarkMSSmithDS (1998) Factors contributing to patient satisfaction with rehabilitation following stroke. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 21, 143–54.
6.
CupEHCop ReamerWJM ScholteThijissenMCEvan Kuyk-MinisMAH (2003) Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17(4), 402–09.
7.
DicksonM (2002) Rehabilitation of motor control following stroke: Searching the evidence. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(6), 269–74.
8.
EdmansJChampionAHillLRidleyMSkellyFJacksonTNealeM, eds (2001) Occupational therapy and stroke. London: Whurr.
9.
FotiD (2001) Activities of daily living. In: PedrettiLWEarlyMB, eds. Occupational therapy: Practice skills for physical dysfunction. 5th ed.St Louis, MO: Mosby, 124–71.
10.
GoldingE (1989) Middlesex Elderly Assessment of Mental State. Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.
11.
HaslamTMBeaulieuK (2007) A comparison of the evidence of two interventions for self-care with stroke patients. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 14(3), 118–27.
12.
KwakkelGvan PeppenRWagenaarRCWood-DauphineeSRichardsCAshburnAMillerKLincolnNPartridgeCWellwoodILanghorneP (2004) Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: A meta-analysis. Stroke, 35, 2529–39.
13.
LawMBaptisteSCarswellAMcCollMPolatajkoHPollockN (1994) The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 2nd ed.Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
14.
LeggLADrummondAELanghorneP (2006) Occupational therapy for patients with problems in activities of daily living after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003585. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD003585. pub2.
15.
LennonS (1996) The Bobath concept: A critical review of the theoretical assumptions that guide physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation. Physical Therapy Reviews, 1, 35–45.
16.
LennonS (2001) Gait re-education based on the Bobath concept in two patients with hemiplegia following stroke. Physical Therapy, 81(3), 924–35.
17.
LincolnNLeadbitterD (1979) Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy, 65(2), 48–51.
18.
MantJWadeDWinnerS (2004) Stroke. In: StevensARafteryJMantJSimpsonS, eds. Health Care Needs Assessment: The epidemiologically based needs assessment reviews. First series, Vol. 1. 2nd ed.Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press. Available at: http://hcna.radcliffe-oxford.com/strframe.htm Accessed on 31.08.08.
19.
MateerCAKernsKA (2000) Capitalizing on neuroplasticity. Brain and Cognition, 42(1), 106–09.
20.
MewM (2006) Effectiveness of normal movement and functional approaches to rehabilitate lower limb dressing following stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial. (Unpublished MSc thesis.) Uxbridge, Middx: Brunel University.
21.
PooleJWhitneyS (2001) Assessment of motor function post stroke: A review. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 19(2), 1–22.
22.
RobertsCTogersonD (1998) Understanding controlled trials: Randomisation methods in controlled trials. British Medical Journal, 317, 1301.
23.
SchultzCHWassermanJOstwaldSK (2006) Recruitment and retention of stroke survivors: The CAReS Experience. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 25(1), 17–29.
24.
ShielAWilsonBA (1992) Performance of stroke patients on the Middlesex Elderly Assessment of Mental State. Clinical Rehabilitation, 6(4), 283–89.
25.
TromblyCA (2002) Restoring the role of the independent person. In: TromblyCARadomskiMV, eds. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. 5th ed.Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 692–64.
26.
WadeDT (1992) Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
WalkerMF (1991) Dressing after stroke. (Unpublished MPhil thesis.) Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
28.
WalkerMFLincolnNB (1990) Reacquisition of dressing skills after stroke. International Disability Studies, 12(1), 41–43.
29.
WalkerMFLincolnNB (1991) Factors influencing dressing performance after stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 54(8), 699–701.
30.
WalkerCMWalkerMF (2001) Dressing ability after stroke: A review of the literature. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(9), 449–54.
31.
WalkerMFDrummondAERLincolnNB (1996) Evaluation of dressing practice for stroke patients after discharge from hospital: A crossover design study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 10(1), 23–31.
32.
WalkerMFDrummondAERGattJSackleyCM (2000) Occupational therapy for stroke patients: A survey of current practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(10), 367–72.
