This article examines the psychometric properties of the 104-item Thinking Styles Inventory (TSI; Sternberg & Wagner, 1992) using responses from 789 students from 4 high schools in Connecticut. Twelve of the 13 subscales identified in mental self-government (MSG) theory (Sternberg, 1988, 1997) were included in all analyses. Both subscale- and item-level confirmatory factor analysis failed to confirm the theory-proposed 5-factor structure as well as 3 other structural models identified in previous studies. Post hoc item-level exploratory factory analysis and subscale score reliability analysis resulted in the omission of 64 original items due to weak psychometric properties. Thirty-two original items were retained, comprising 5 subscales, Liberal/Progressive, External, Hierarchic, Judicial, and Legislative/Self-Reliant, largely consistent with those identified in MSG theory. Implications of the results are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BernardoA. B. I.ZhangL. F.CalluengC. M. (2002). Thinking styles and academic achievement among Filipino students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology,163, 149–163
2.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press
3.
Cano-GarciaF.HughesE. Hewitt (2000). Learning and thinking styles: An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement. Educational Psychology,20, 413–430
4.
CattellR. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis. New York: Plenum
5.
CharterR. A. (2003). A breakdown of reliability coefficients by test type and reliability method, and the clinical implications of low reliability. The Journal of General Psychology,130, 290–304
6.
CortinaJ. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology,78, 98–104
7.
DaiD. Y.FeldhusenJ. F. (1999). A validation study of the Thinking Styles Inventory: Implications for gifted education. Roeper Review,21, 302–307
8.
FjellA. M.WalhovdK. B. (2004). Thinking styles in relation to personality traits: An investigation of the Thinking Styles Inventory and NEO-PI-R. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,45, 293–300
9.
GrigorenkoE. L.SternbergR. J. (1997). Style of thinking, abilities, and academic performance. Exceptional Children,63, 295–312
10.
KimJ.MuellerC. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
11.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press
O'HaraL. A.SternbergR. J. (2000–2001). It doesn't hurt to ask: Effects of instructions to be creative, practical, or analytical on essay-writing performance and their interaction with students' thinking styles. Creativity Research Journal,13, 197–210
SchaferJ. L.GrahamJ. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods,7, 147–177
16.
SchmittN (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment,8, 350–353
17.
StegerM. F. (2006). An illustration of issues in factor extraction and identification of dimensionality in psychological assessment data. Journal of Personality Assessment,86, 263–272
18.
SternbergR. J. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development,31, 197–224
19.
SternbergR. J. (1994). Thinking styles: Theory and assessment at the interface between intelligence and personality. In SternbergR. J.RuzgisP. (Eds.), Personality and intelligence (pp. 169–187. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
20.
SternbergR. J. (1997). Thinking styles. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
21.
SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L. (1993). Thinking styles and the gifted. Roeper Review,16, 122–130
22.
SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L. (1995). Styles of thinking in the school. European Journal for High Ability,6, 201–219
23.
SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L. (1997). A capsule history of theory and research on styles. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Thinking styles (pp. 133–147. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
24.
SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L. (2001). A capsule history of theory and research on styles. In SternbergR. J.ZhangL. F. (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 1–21. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
25.
SternbergR. J.WagnerR. K. (1992). Thinking Styles Inventory. Unpublished manual, Yale University
26.
ThompsonB (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
27.
ZhangL. F. (2000). Abilities, academic performance, learning approaches, and thinking styles: A three-culture investigation. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies,1, 123–149
28.
ZhangL. F. (2001). Do thinking styles contribute to academic achievement beyond self-rated abilities?The Journal of Psychology,135, 621–637
29.
ZhangL. F. (2002a). Thinking styles: Their relationships with modes of thinking and academic performance. Educational Psychology,22, 331–348
30.
ZhangL. F. (2002b). Thinking styles and cognitive development. The Journal of Genetic Psychology,163, 179–195
31.
ZhangL. F. (2002c). Thinking styles and the big five personality traits. Educational Psychology,22, 17–31
32.
ZhangL. F. (2004). Revisiting the predictive power of thinking styles for academic performance. The Journal of Psychology,138, 351–370
33.
ZhangL. F. (2006). Thinking styles and the big five personality traits revisited. Personality and Individual Differences,40, 1177–1187
34.
ZhangL. F.PostiglioneG. A. (2001). Thinking styles, self-esteem, and socio-economic status. Personality and Individual Differences,31, 1333–1346
35.
ZhangL. F.SachsJ. (1997). Assessing thinking styles in the theory of mental self-government: A Hong Kong validation study. Psychological Reports,81, 915–928
36.
ZhangL. F.SternbergR. J. (2005). A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review,17, 1–53
