This article examines the experiences of special education teachers working to advance inclusive services and supports for students with extensive support needs within systemically segregated schooling spaces and ideologies. Although evidence suggests that teacher agency promotes positive outcomes, few studies examine firsthand the experiences of teachers in training as they navigate unique work ecologies requiring localized solutions to exclusionary mechanisms. We present a multiple case study analysis of five students as they moved through a 2-year master’s degree program designed to prepare action-oriented inclusive educators. Findings describe overarching themes related to teacher agency: (a) influence of teacher preparation, (b) teacher agency in relational ecologies of exclusion, and (c) subversive actions and power dynamics. Results illuminate often-invisibilized challenges and hold implications for researchers, teacher educators, and administrators interested in preparing special educators of students with extensive support needs.
ArtilesA. J.KozleskiE. B. (2016). Inclusive education’s promises and trajectories: Critical notes about future research on a venerable idea. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, 43. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.1919
2.
BartlettL.VavrusF. (2016). Rethinking case study research: A comparative approach. Routledge.
3.
BeckerH. S. (2009). How to find out how to do qualitative research. International Journal of Communication, 3, 545–553. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/How-to-Find-Out-How-to-Do-Qualitative-Research-Becker/48fa003d9a24e2dadb6273845e534d686cff3614
4.
BhattacharyaK. (2017). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Routledge.
5.
BiestaG.TedderM. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545
6.
BillingsleyB.BettiniE.MathewsH. M.McLeskeyJ. (2020). Improving working conditions to support special educators’ effectiveness: A call for leadership. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419880353
7.
CalvertL. (2016). The power of teacher agency: Why we must transform professional learning so that it really supports educator learning. Journal of Staff Development, 37, 51–56. https://learningforward.org/journal/april-2016-issue/the-power-of-teacher-agency/
8.
CarterN.Bryant-LukosiusD.DiCensoA.BlytheJ.NevilleA. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
9.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
10.
CinderbyS.ForresterJ. M. (2016). Co-designing possible flooding solutions: Participatory mapping methods to identify flood management options from a UK borders case study. Journal for Geographic Information Science, 1, 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2016_01_s149
11.
DanforthS.NaraianS. (2015). This new field of inclusive education: Beginning a dialogue on conceptual foundations. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 53(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-53.1.70
12.
DeschênesM.ParentS. (2022). Methodology to study teacher agency: A systematic review of the literature. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 2459–2476. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.2459
13.
GlavanM. (2020). Toward a personally situated approach to advocacy: Expanding community-engaged rhetoric to parent advocacy in special education. Rhetoric Review, 39(3), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2020.1764774
14.
HeikonenL.ToomA.PyhaltoK.PietarinenJ.SoiniT. (2017). Student-teachers’ strategies in classroom interaction in the context of the teaching practicum. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(5), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1355080
15.
HsiehB. (2023). A matter of respect. Educational Leadership, 81(1), 62–67.
16.
KliewerC.BiklenD.PetersenA. (2015). At the end of intellectual disability. Harvard Educational Review, 85(1), 1–28. http://doi.org/10.17763/haer.85.1.j260u3gv2402v576
17.
KurthJ.MorningstarM.KozleskiE. (2014). The persistence of highly restrictive special education placements for students with low incidence disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39(3), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796914555580
18.
LewisA. E.DiamondJ. B. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford University Press.
19.
LiL.RupparA. (2020). Conceptualizing teacher agency for inclusive education: A systematic and international review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406420926976
20.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
21.
LipskyD. K.GartnerA. (1989). Beyond separate education: Quality education for all. Paul H. Brookes.
22.
LipskyD. K.GartnerA. (1992). Achieving full inclusion: Placing the difficult-to-teach student in regular schools. Exceptional Children, 59(3), 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299305900306
23.
MansouriM. C.MillerA. L.KurthJ. A.RuhterL.WiltC. L.ToewsS. G.MorningstarM. E. (2024). Teachers’ insights on cultivating inclusive education for students with complex support needs. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 126(9), 118–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681241302637
24.
Mason-WilliamsL.BettiniE.PeytonD.HarveyA.RosenbergM.SindelarP. T. (2020). Rethinking shortages in special education: Making good on the promise of an equal opportunity for students with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419880352
25.
McKayL. (2016). Beginning teachers and inclusive education: Frustrations, dilemmas and growth. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(4), 383–396. http://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1081635
26.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Josey-Bass.
27.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods Victoria Elliott sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
28.
MillerA. L. (2022). Reconceptualizing education grounded in the multimodal discourses of girls of color labeled with significant cognitive disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 47(3), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221119848
29.
MillerA. L.MansouriM. C.RuhterL. C.KurthJ. A.MorningstarM. E.ToewsS. G.WiltC. L.AndreoliM. (2025). Rightful presence? Teacher candidates navigating inclusive education for youth with complex support needs. Exceptional Children, 91(3), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029251317029
30.
MillerA. L.WiltC. L.AllcockH. C.KurthJ. A.MorningstarM. E.RupparA. L. (2022). Teacher agency for inclusive education: An international scoping review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(12), 1159–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1789766
31.
MooreM.SleeR. (2013). Disability studies, inclusive education and exclusion. In WatsonN.RoulstoneA.ThomasC. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 236–250). Routledge.
32.
NagroS. A.deBettencourtL. U. (2017). Reviewing special education teacher preparation field experience placements, activities, and research: Do we know the difference maker?Teacher Education Quarterly, 44(3), 7–33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90010901
33.
NaraianS. (2020). What can “inclusion” mean in the post-human Era?Journal of Disability Studies in Education, 1(1–2), 14–34. http://doi.org/10.1163/25888803-bja10001
34.
NaraianS.SchlessingerS. (2018). Becoming an inclusive educator: Agentive maneuverings in collaboratively taught classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 179–189. http://.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.012
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
37.
PyhältöK.KeskinenJ. (2012). Doctoral students’ sense of relational agency in their scholarly communities. International Journal of Higher Education, 1(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v1n2p136
38.
RaginC. C.BeckerH. S. (1992). What is a case?: Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge University Press.
39.
RupparA.KurthJ.BubashS.Lockman TurnerE. (2023). A framework for preparing to teach students with extensive support needs in the 21st century. Teacher Education and Special Education, 46(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064211059853
40.
SailorW. (2008–2009). Access to the general curriculum: Systems change or tinker some more?Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 34(1), 249–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.33.4.249
41.
SaldañaJ. M. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
42.
SauerJ.JorgensenC. (2016). Still caught in the continuum: A critical analysis of least restrictive environment and its effect on placement of students with intellectual disability. Inclusion, 4, 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-4.2.56
SoiniT.PietarinenJ.ToomA.PyhältöK. (2015). What contributes to first-year student teachers’ sense of professional agency in the classroom?Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 641–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044326
45.
StainbackS.StainbackW. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298405100202
46.
StainbackS.StainbackW. (1990). Support networks for inclusive schooling: Interdependent integrated education. Paul H. Brookes.
47.
StakeR. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. The Guilford Press.
48.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (2nd ed.). Sage.
49.
ThemaneM.ThobejaneH. R. (2019). Teachers as change agents in making teaching inclusive in some selected rural schools of Limpopo Province, South Africa: Implications for teacher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(4), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1434690
50.
ToewsS. G.HanreddyA.MahoneyE. (2023). Reimagining education, learning, and partnership: Experiences of caregivers of students with extensive support needs during distance learning. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 125(6), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681231184514
51.
Van der HeijdenH. R. M. A.GeldensJ. J.BeijaardD.PopeijusH. L. (2015). Characteristics of teachers as change agents. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 681–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044328
52.
YinR. K. (2013). Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation, 19(3), 321–332. http://doi.org/10.1177/1356389013497081
