Despite extensive research, questions underlying the nature and nurture of talent remain both numerous and diverse. In the current paper, we present an account that addresses 2 of the primary questions inspired by this debate: (a) the very existence of innate talents and (b) how exceptional abilities are developed. The development of exceptional performance is addressed through a synthesis of recent models that invoke multiplier effects to explain how differences in initial conditions (e.g., different levels of innate abilities), coupled with gene-environment interactions, determine ranges of phenotypic outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnastasiA. (1958). Heredity, environment, and the question “How?”Psychological Review, 65, 197–208.
2.
BlackshawS.FraioliR. E.FurukawaT.CepkoC. L. (2001). Comprehensive analysis of photoreceptor gene expression and the identification of candidate retinal disease genes. Cell, 107, 579–589.
3.
BronfenbrennerU.CeciS. J. (1993). Heredity, environment, and the question “how.” In PlominR.McClearnG. (Eds.), Nature, nurture, & psychology (pp. 313–324). Washington, DC: APA Books.
4.
BronfenbrennerU.CeciS. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586.
5.
CaspiA.McClayJ.MoffittT. E.MillJ.MartinJ.CraigI. W.TaylorA.PoultonR. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297, 851–855.
6.
CeciS. J. (1996). On intelligence: A bio-ecological treatise on intellectual development (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
CeciS. J.BarnettS. M.KanayaT. (2003). Developing childhood proclivities into adult competencies: The overlooked multiplier effect. In SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L. (Eds.), The Psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (pp. 126–158). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CeciS. J.PapiernoP. B. (2005). The rhetoric and reality of gap-closing: When the “have nots” gain, but the “haves” gain more. American Psychologist, 60, 149–160.
9.
DettermanD. K. (1993). Giftedness and intelligence: One and the same? In BockG. R.AckrillK. (Eds.), The origins and development of high ability: CIBA Foundation Symposium, 178 (pp. 22–43). Chicester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
DickensW. T.FlynnJ. R. (2001). Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: The IQ paradox resolved. Psychological Review, 108, 346–369.
11.
DrillienC. M. (1964). Growth and development of the prematurely born infant. London: E. & S. Livingstone.
12.
EricssonK. A. (1996). The road to expert performance: Empirical evidence from the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
EricssonK. A.CharnessN. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.
14.
EricssonK. A.CharnessN. (1999). Becoming an expert—training or talent? In CeciS. J.WilliamsW. M. (Eds.). The nature-nurture debate: The essential readings (pp. 200–255). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
15.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR. T.HeizmannS. (1993). Can we create gifted people? In BockG. R.AckrillK. (Eds.), The origins and development of high ability. Chichester, England: Wiley.
16.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR. T.Tesch-RömerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
17.
GagnéF. (1991). Toward a differentiated model of giftedness and talent. In ColangeloN.DavidG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 65–80). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
18.
GaltonF. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.
19.
GinsburgE.LivshitsG. (1999). Segregation analysis of quantitative traits. Annals of Human Biology, 26, 103–129.
20.
HarrodR. F. (1936). The trade cycle. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
21.
HoweM. J. A.DavidsonJ. W.SlobodaJ. A. (1998). Innate talents: Reality or myth?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 399–442.
22.
JensenA. R. (1997). The puzzle of nongenetic variance. In SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L. (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 42–88). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
PlattR. (1966). General introduction. In MeadeJ. E.ParkesA. S. (Eds.), Genetic and environmental factors in human ability (pp. ix-xi). Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver & Boyd.
24.
PlominR.DeFriesJ. C.CraigI. W.McGuffinP. (2003). Behavioral genetics in the postgenomic era. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
SamuelsonP. (1939). Interactions between the multiplier analysis and principles of acceleration. Review of Economic Statistics, 21(2), 75–78.
26.
SimonH. A.ChaseW. G. (1973). Skill in chess. American Scientist, 61, 394–403.
27.
SimontonD. K. (1999a). Creativity from a historiometric perspective. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 116–136). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
SimontonD. K. (1999b). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106, 435–457.
29.
SimontonD. K. (2001). Talent development as a multidimensional, multiplicative, and dynamic process. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 39–43.
30.
StanovichK. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406.
31.
WatsonJ. B. (1924). Behaviorism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
