The identification of academically gifted children from the perspective of aptitude theory is discussed. Aptitude refers to the degree of readiness to learn and to perform well in a particular situation or domain. The primary aptitudes for academic success are (a) prior achievement in a domain, (b) the ability to reason in the symbol systems used to communicate new knowledge in that domain, (c) interest in the domain, and (d) persistence in the type of learning environments offered for the attainment of expertise in the domain. Careful attention to the demands and affordances of different instructional environments enables educators to identify those individuals who are most ready to succeed in them. Although the principles discussed here are useful for all students, they are particularly important for the identification of academically promising minority students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckermanP. L. (2003). Aptitude complexes and trait complexes. Educational Psychologist, 38, 85–94.
2.
AssoulineS. G. (2003). Psychological and educational assessment of gifted children. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 124–145). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
BinghamW. V. (1937). Aptitudes and aptitude testing. New York: Harper & Brother.
4.
CarrollJ. B. (1974). The aptitude-achievement distinction: The case of foreign language aptitude and proficiency. In GreenD. R. (Ed.), The aptitude-achievement distinction (pp. 286–303). Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.
5.
CarrollJ. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6.
CaseM. E. (1977). A validation study of the Nonverbal Battery of the Cognitive Abilities Test at grades 3, 4, and, 6. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
7.
CornoL.CronbachL. J.KupermintzH.LohmanD. F.MandinachE. B.PorteusA. W.TalbertJ. E. (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
CronbachL. J.SnowR. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.
9.
FlynnJ. R. (1999). Searching for justice: The discovery of IQ gains over time. American Psychologist, 54, 5–20.
10.
GustafssonJ. -E.BaulkeG. (1993). General and specific abilities as predictors of school achievement. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 407–434.
11.
HagenE. P. (1980). Identification of the gifted. New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
HooverH. D.DunbarS. B.FrisbieD. A. (2001). Iowa Tests of Basic Skills: Form A. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
13.
HorganJ. (1995). Get smart, take a test. Scientific American, 273(5), 14.
14.
HumphreysL. G. (1973). Implications of group differences for test interpretation. In Proceedings of the 1972 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems: Assessment in a Pluralistic Society (pp. 56–71). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
15.
JencksC. (1998). Racial bias in testing. In JencksC.PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 55–85). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
16.
JencksC.PhillipsM. (Eds.). (1998). The Black-White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
17.
KeithT. Z. (1999). Effects of general and specific abilities on student achievement: Similarities and differences across ethnic groups. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 239–262.
18.
LindseyK. A.ManisF. R.BaileyC. E. (2003). Prediction of first-grade reading in Spanish-speaking English-language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 482–494.
19.
LohmanD. F. (2004). Tables of prediction efficiencies. Retrieved August 21, 2004, from The University of Iowa, College of Education Web site: http://faculty.education.uiowa.edu/dlohman.
20.
LohmanD. F. (2005). The role of nonverbal ability tests in identifying students for participation in programs for the academically gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 111–138.
21.
LohmanD. F. (in press). Identifying academically gifted minority students: A users guide to theory and method (Research Monograph). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
22.
LohmanD. F.HagenE. P. (2001a). Cognitive Abilities Test (Form, 6). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
23.
LohmanD. F.HagenE. P. (2001b). Cognitive Abilities Test (Form 6): Interpretive guide for teachers and counselors. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
24.
LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 137–150.
25.
LubinskiD.BenbowC. P.RyanJ. (1995). The stability of vocational interests among the intellectually gifted from adolescence to adulthood: A 15-year longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 196–200.
26.
MartinD. J. (1985). The measurement of growth in educational achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa, Iowa City.
27.
McGrewK. S.EvansJ. J. (2004). Internal and external factorial extensions to the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory of cognitive abilities: A review of factor analytic research since Carroll's seminal 1993 treatise (Carroll Human Cognitive Abilities Project Research Report No. 2). Retrieved July 20, 2004, from the Institute for Applied Psychometrics Web site: http://www.iapsych.com/carrollproject.htm.
28.
PetersonP. L. (1977). Interactive effects of student anxiety, achievement orientation, and teacher behavior on student achievement and attitude. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 779–792.
29.
PresseleyM.RaphaelL.GallagherJ. D.DiBellaJ. (2004). Providence-St. Mel School: How a school that works for African American students works. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 216–235.
30.
RockD. A.CentraJ. A.LinnR. L. (1970). Relationships between college characteristics and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 7, 109–121.
31.
RufD. L. (2003). Use of the SB5 in the assessment of high abilities (Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th ed.: Assessment Service Bulletin No. 3). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
32.
SheaD. L.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604–614.
33.
SnowR. E.LohmanD. F. (1984). Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 347–376.
34.
SnowR. E.YalowE. (1982). Education and intelligence. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 493–585). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
35.
SubotnikR.JarvinL. (2005). Beyond expertise: Conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 343–357). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
TannerJ. M. (1965). Physique and athletic performance: A study of Olympic athletes. In BarnettS. A.McLarenA. (Eds.), Penguin science survey 1965 B (pp. 112–133). Baltimore: Penguin Books.
37.
ThorndikeR. L. (1975). Mr. Binet's test 70 years later. Educational Researcher, 4, 3–7.
38.
ThorndikeR. L.HagenE. P. (1987). Cognitive Abilities Test (Form 4): Technical manual. Chicago: Riverside.
39.
ThorndikeR. L.HagenE. P. (1997). Cognitive Abilities Test (Form 5): Research handbook. Chicago: Riverside.
40.
TraubG. E.McGrewK. S. (2004). A confirmatory factor analysis of Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory and cross-age invariance of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities III. School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 72–87.
41.
WillinghamW. W.LewisC.MorganR.RamsitL. (1990). Predicting college grades: An analysis of institutional trends over two decades. New York: The College Board.
